The SuperHeroHype Forums  

Go Back   The SuperHeroHype Forums > The Avengers > The Avengers Sequels

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-29-2015, 08:31 AM   #1
Demileto
Side-Kick
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 410
Default James Gunn: "Fox owns KANG"

Source: http://www.spoilertv.com/2015/05/mar...owns-film.html

Thoughts?

Demileto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2015, 05:42 PM   #2
MakeMinesMarvel
Banned User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,452
Default Re: James Gunn: "Fox owns KANG"


MakeMinesMarvel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2015, 08:59 PM   #3
Avenger
Earth's Mightiest Fanboy
 
Avenger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: New England
Posts: 832
Default Re: James Gunn: "Fox owns KANG"

That's too bad. I was kinda hoping he'd be the main villain of the first post-Infinity War Avengers movie.

__________________
"They always talk about transcending the genre and I don't believe in transcending the genre. I believe in the genre." -Joss Whedon
Avenger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2015, 09:16 AM   #4
The Villain
Side-Kick
 
The Villain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Scotland
Posts: 912
Default Re: James Gunn: "Fox owns KANG"

Kang would be cool and perhaps Korvac?

The Villain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2016, 08:04 PM   #5
KangConquers
Purple Kang, Purple Kang
 
KangConquers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 7,104
Default Re: James Gunn: "Fox owns KANG"

Probably not for long after F4.

KangConquers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2016, 04:37 PM   #6
Dasher10
I'm like Deadpool IRL
 
Dasher10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 3,767
Default Re: James Gunn: "Fox owns KANG"

Even without Kang, Marvel still have Korvac, High Evolutionary, Count Nefaria, Namor, MODOK and Proctor.

__________________
Thread Manager Is My Most Hated Mod
Dasher10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2016, 04:38 AM   #7
eon001
Side-Kick
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 474
Default Re: James Gunn: "Fox owns KANG"

Not sure if that's true. Kang's first appearance was in The Avengers #8 according to wiki.
That being said, if that's true it would be so frustrating considering Fox will probably never get round to using him. And if they do, they won't know what to do with him and totally ***k him up.

eon001 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2016, 02:44 AM   #8
TheVileOne
Side-Kick
 
TheVileOne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: California
Posts: 41,771
Default Re: James Gunn: "Fox owns KANG"

It's not always about first appearances. Kingpin first appeared in the pages of The Amazing Spider-Man. He didn't really become a Daredevil villain until much later. Punisher also appeared in Spider-Man originally, but his rights were at Lionsgate/Artistan at first.

I think it's really just about how Marvel sold certain character licenses off. They probably sold certain groups together.

It might take a while, but hopefully Marvel gets all the characters back after a while.

__________________
"This is true. This is real. This . . . Is . . . Straight Edge."

- CM Punk
TheVileOne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2016, 09:26 PM   #9
Dasher10
I'm like Deadpool IRL
 
Dasher10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 3,767
Default Re: James Gunn: "Fox owns KANG"

Quote:
Originally Posted by eon001 View Post
Not sure if that's true. Kang's first appearance was in The Avengers #8 according to wiki.
That being said, if that's true it would be so frustrating considering Fox will probably never get round to using him. And if they do, they won't know what to do with him and totally ***k him up.
Kang is at Fox because Marvel didn't even consider an Avengers film series and sold the Avengers off one by one. Iron Man was at New Line, Spider-Man and Luke Cage were at Sony, Hulk was at Universal and Thor was at Paramount. Kang was bundled with the Fantastic Four because there was no way to do an Avengers film.

And yeah, Fox don't care about the Fantastic Four at all and it shows. Plus I care more about Fantastic Four villains in other Marvel properties like Doom vs Black Panther, Annihilus vs the Guardians and Kang vs Avengers than I do about another Fantastic Four film. When Fox can't even legally cross the FF over with the X-Men, I'm not sure if Fox would even want to do a sequel or another reboot since the FF universe would feel very small and isolated compared to the Avengers and X-Men shared universes. Plus, FF just uses up a release date that could go to something that carries a lot less risk.

__________________
Thread Manager Is My Most Hated Mod
Dasher10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2016, 04:58 PM   #10
TheVileOne
Side-Kick
 
TheVileOne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: California
Posts: 41,771
Default Re: James Gunn: "Fox owns KANG"

Yeah. Just like how they sold Kingpin to Fox with Daredevil even though the character originated in the pages of Spider-Man.

__________________
"This is true. This is real. This . . . Is . . . Straight Edge."

- CM Punk
TheVileOne is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:21 PM.

monitoring_string = "dee460792f24517621e3ca080805de7e"


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SuperHeroHype.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2016 All Rights Reserved.