Recent content by Jansom

Cope harder my guys, it's been a blast. Feel free to report me or do whatever you want, I don't really care. It's not like I frequent this place for years or something.

Slice of Life? That's a new one. Well, since nobody seems able to quit this, I Guess I will have to ignore you all. Don't really that I care, but since you keep going with this charade I Guess would be the best, or the thread could be ruined for some time.

Valid, yes. Other movies did a better job with it tho.

Another Guy that uses that word but can't proof otherwise how wrong I am. I start to sense some m.o.

Oh, so it's a mediocre film on purpose. Got It. You guys and your mental gymnastics are weird, but predictable. Anyway, have a nice day, Hope we see the Batsuit soon.

But Ok, again, enjoy that flick, I sense we Should Focus on The Batman for the best of us all, isn't?

You keep using that word, and yet you do nothing to try to argue with me. At least the others can keep going a decent chat about this.

In a way you're right. But a movie is far more than just one character. Even King Of Comedy knew that. Yeah, that movie was all about Rupert's perspective and how he wanted to become The King Of Comedy, but you also had Jerry Lewis on it, and that crazy lady that was obsessed with Jerry, and...

Fair enough young lad. Now, let's stay with The Batman, shall we? I think I already said enough about my POV on that movie, and so did everyone here I suppose? Taxi Driver at least had Jodie Foster and Martin Scorcese. 127 hours is a literal good example of how to do a movie focused on just...

Then the movie has no quality besides Arthur and some stuff like the Score or the cinematography. It's just a mediocre film with just one decent character then. And now is when you're gonna try to proof that wrong too and yada yada.

1) I think it's pretty clear what I'm saying, you looking into it and understanding It it's another deal tho. 2) Ok, fair point there tho. But you have this movie being called a literal masterpiece by everyone, so I expect to have more decent characters besides Arthur.

I'm posting my POV of things, not my problem that half the forum is jumping into my neck for it. Again, Ok, have It your way, they're terrible adaptations then. Bruce, Thomas, Martha, Alfred... Two of them show up to die, one of them just shows up just because, and the other just stands there...

1) So that excuses them to repeat the same thing? Hell no, that's not excuse. If Joker is killed 6 movies ago, that means I can kill him too just because others did? Nah man, Thomas and Martha are more than Dead bodies that get shot. 2) Whatever, Ok, they are Comic Book Narrative Tools.

Relax man, I don't want you to cry, this is just a debate. You can still like that movie, but good luck making me like it for being a supposed CBM.

What a mature response, sir. You literally have no way to argue back, do you? Have It your way. They are comic characters. Characters that contribute nothing to this movie. But Comic Book Characters, that makes them better...I Guess?