🇷🇺🇺🇦 Discussion: Relations with Russia and the war in Ukraine


Of course he doesnt.
Everyone with a brain knows that his constant threats that if this or that is done, is just empty.
He didnt do anything big when the sanctions hit, when the ammunition etc was delivered...despite claiming so.

Again, he didnt manage to take the Ukraine in 2 years despite being prepared and surprising them.
His super Battle Ships have been ruined, the super high tech arsenal he always showed around...is not existing to wage war, and he has to rely on cheap drones.
And he doesnt have Chinas 100% support because guess what, countries like china and russia do not trust someone fully.

There is not angle where War with the NATO would be in his favor.
 
Of course he doesnt.
Everyone with a brain knows that his constant threats that if this or that is done, is just empty.
He didnt do anything big when the sanctions hit, when the ammunition etc was delivered...despite claiming so.

Again, he didnt manage to take the Ukraine in 2 years despite being prepared and surprising them.
His super Battle Ships have been ruined, the super high tech arsenal he always showed around...is not existing to wage war, and he has to rely on cheap drones.
And he doesnt have Chinas 100% support because guess what, countries like china and russia do not trust someone fully.

There is not angle where War with the NATO would be in his favor.

I think these levels of cope will end should a NATO-Russia war hit a mature stage. Right now the losses to NATO are abstract: diplomatic weakness in the global south, deindustrialization of Germany, mercenaries dying, higher inflation in the USA, etc. These are the sorts of things many people can comfortably ignore, particularly on social media.

It will change when our brothers, sons, cousins, etc are being shipped to war, as happened in the 1960s.

Lastly, world war III is also being fought in multiple theaters. It's unlikely that the Palestinians, Lebanese, and Yemenis would be able to stand up to genocidal onslaughts under total Western hegemony. Look what happened to Iraq (which Biden supported), and contrast to Yemen defying the US and British Navy. And Gabon and Niger would have not been able to boot France.
 
Of course he doesnt.
Everyone with a brain knows that his constant threats that if this or that is done, is just empty.
He didnt do anything big when the sanctions hit, when the ammunition etc was delivered...despite claiming so.

Again, he didnt manage to take the Ukraine in 2 years despite being prepared and surprising them.
His super Battle Ships have been ruined, the super high tech arsenal he always showed around...is not existing to wage war, and he has to rely on cheap drones.
And he doesnt have Chinas 100% support because guess what, countries like china and russia do not trust someone fully.

There is not angle where War with the NATO would be in his favor.
I hope you're right. Just as long as Putin doesn't decide to use nuclear weapons as a last resort or anything like that. :(
 

Dear connected and important men, your ego will betray you. You were likely told this before. Lonely pretty Russian or Ukrainian woman buttering you up is not your new lady friend, stop thinking otherwise. This kind of tradecraft is one of the oldest in the book.
 
I think these levels of cope will end should a NATO-Russia war hit a mature stage. Right now the losses to NATO are abstract: diplomatic weakness in the global south, deindustrialization of Germany, mercenaries dying, higher inflation in the USA, etc. These are the sorts of things many people can comfortably ignore, particularly on social media.

It will change when our brothers, sons, cousins, etc are being shipped to war, as happened in the 1960s.

Lastly, world war III is also being fought in multiple theaters. It's unlikely that the Palestinians, Lebanese, and Yemenis would be able to stand up to genocidal onslaughts under total Western hegemony. Look what happened to Iraq (which Biden supported), and contrast to Yemen defying the US and British Navy. And Gabon and Niger would have not been able to boot France.

The **** you talking about WW3.

****ing tankies....
 
I'm pleasantly surprised by Victoria Nuland's "retirement" -- I didn't see that coming. She was America's number 2 diplomat under Biden and is only 63 years old.

Nuland is the American official most responsible for the current catastrophe in the Ukraine. She famously said "[redacted] the EU" when the US overthrew Ukraine's democracy in 2014 and replaced it with a NATO puppet regime. A million deaths and a geopolitical catastrophe for the West are her legacy.

Normally, people like her only fail upwards. Her departure seems like a ray of sunshine on a cloudy horizon.
 
That's scary. :(

I read the article and there's no substantive evidence in there.

I also think there's no point in weaponizing the moon. Going there has three purposes:
- Prestige. It's the global equivalent of a beautiful peacock's tail.
- Mining.
- Scientific experiments. Hard astrophysics and particle physics. It's the best place for ultraviolet and radio telescopes.
 
I think down the road moon mining will be a big deal, especially since they think there may be a lot of water at the poles.
 
I think down the road moon mining will be a big deal, especially since they think there may be a lot of water at the poles.
Unless there is some exceedingly light and valuable mineral, or whatever, on the moon that we don't have on earth, mining will probably be constrained to use there. Shipping, in the foreseeable future, isn't really an option. I can see the ability to colonize both the moon and Mars to some extent, but I can't see concluding that power mongers won't find some use of space, and bases therein, to further their aims of riches and power through the use of force and coercion.
 
Last edited:

The USA was never going to be able the rule the planet forever. The American empire might have lasted longer had it had better leadership than Clinton, Bush, etc but that ship has sailed, and any talk of the US imposing its will at the other end of the world on Russia, China, Iran, etc is simply delusional White supremacy.

The focus at this point should be better relations with the rest of the world and rebuilding the Republic at home. American is falling apart, with declining life expectancy, increasing infant mortality, high inflation, poor educational standards, crumbling infrastructure, rising crime, etc. To anybody who is not sheltered, those are more important priorities than taking longer to lose a war in Ukraine.

I speak as a hardworking father of a young family. I see some of the real issues. There's endless paperwork for any appointment with the health system, some claims take years to resolve with insurance. At my kids' school, a kid punched a pregnant teacher in the stomach. When I drive a younger daughter to daycare which costs over $1000/month and would cost 2400/month for an infant, there are car accidents every day. Meanwhile the cost of food rises 10-20% a year. At least I bought my house when I did, because just in the past few years the cost of a mortgage on it has tripled.

These are real problems. But our sheltered elites are pampered, they live in bubbles, and they're focused on ... Ukraine and Taiwan. Just WTF. The country around them is falling apart, but they don't care, they have their Raytheon stock to worry about.
 
Last edited:





Make our NATO team as big and powerful as possible I say, our enemies in the new Axis Powers dictatorships aren't waiting around.
 
Last edited:





Make our NATO team as big and powerful as possible I say, our enemies in the new Axis Powers dictatorships aren't waiting around.
Agreed, along with making sure we don't end up with a dictator here at home.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
202,398
Messages
22,097,289
Members
45,893
Latest member
DooskiPack
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"