Marvin
Avenger
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2003
- Messages
- 19,564
- Reaction score
- 2
- Points
- 31
You really don't know how this works.
If I made a movie for $400 million and it made $800 million...did it do better than ASM?
I also like how you said supposedly...like boxofficemojo.com is in some big conspiracy to question your 'facts'.
maybe I don't get it. In your example what you have is more or less a 400 unit margin of profit so no, your example would not equal more than ASM's assuming it's a simply Revenue minus expense equation.
800 - 400 = 400
Using the posted numbers ASM is listed at $697(mill) on BOmojo. As of the last time I check. It's also got a listed (production) budget of $230(mill).
697 - 230 = $467
your example comes out to 400 whereas ASM comes out to 467.
Back to the real comparison if I may. The first Iron man has a listed production budget of 140units. It's listed gross revenue is at 585 units.
585 - 140 = $445.
I'm doing the math in my head so forgive me if I'm wrong but it seems ASM trumps Ironman by 22 million dollars whilst trumping IM2 by 43 million.
ASM - $467
IronMan - $445
IronMan2 - $424
However maybe your right, maybe I don't know how it works and I'm way off base here. Let me know. I will would very much like to add that ASM is still making money too.
Anyways you mentioned my doubting nature of the numbers BO posts. Sure, Studios not only lie all the time but these numbers hardly take into account the total expenses an actual film consumes from it's conception till it's no longer being distributed(mainly promotion).