bored said:Speaking of way back, I hadn't gotten to respond to this yet:
I'd say a fertilized embryo is a 'living being' the way a seed in the ground is. It has the potential to become a living being, and it starts to take attributes of one later, but it isn't yet, and I don't think that qualifies it for Constitutional protection.
So???bored said:That doesn't refute, that just twists it in your direction. Not everyone believes that 'playing it safe' is the right way to go.
THWIP* said:SHEESH.......WAL-MART SELLS COATHANGERS AND TOILET BRUSHES........WHAT MORE DO THEY NEED?![]()
![]()
Man-Thing said:http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/02/02/AR2006020200351_pf.html
Women Sue Wal-Mart Over Morning-After Pill
The Associated Press
Thursday, February 2, 2006; 7:15 AM
BOSTON -- Backed by abortion rights groups, three Massachusetts women sued Wal-Mart on Wednesday, accusing the retail giant of violating a state regulation by failing to stock emergency contraception pills in its pharmacies.
The lawsuit, filed in state court, seeks to force the company to carry the morning-after pill in its 44 Wal-Marts and four Sam Club stores in Massachusetts.
The plaintiffs argued that state policy requires pharmacies to provide all "commonly prescribed medicines."
Wal-Mart carries the morning-after pill in Illinois only, where it is required under state law, said Dan Fogleman, a spokesman for Bentonville, Ark.-based Wal-Mart.
Fogleman said the company "chooses not to carry many products for business reasons." He would not elaborate. But in a letter to a lawyer for the plaintiffs, a Wal-Mart attorney said the store chain does not regard the drug as "commonly prescribed."
CVS, the state's largest pharmacy chain, stocks the pill at all of its drugstores.
© 2006 The Associated Press
I guess keeping your pants up is just too much to ask for.![]()
Man-Thing said:But sometimes they accidently have sex with people. You know sometimes these women just walk out their doors and slip on a bannana peel and fall on some guys erected penis. They have no other choice but to continue riding it until it ejaculates inside them
They are really victims, because it was an accident.
Holly Goodhead said:i always lose at Life, i hate that game and the cereal also sucks.
bored said:I did, way back in the first page or so.
rogue_devlin said:I know, that's why I said basically not a full "nobody".
Besides I agreed on your post, but I thought that the purpose of the thread was different.
bored said:The primary purpose, yes, to show the absurdity of a few women suing Wal-Mart for the reason they did, but Man-Thing also decided to word the title of the thread the way he did, and I doubt he didn't think it would bother someone or another.
Man-Thing said:So???
Not everyone believes that all people have a right to life, but the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence says we do. Does that make the Constitution invalid?
i'm guess your either a virgin or willing to father thousands of children over your lifetime...Erzengel said:If you are engaging in sex, you should be aware of the consequences.
J Alba's Lover said:i wonder what i can sue for now these days?
J Alba's Lover said:i wonder what i can sue for now these days?
psychocheeseman said:i'm guess your either a virgin or willing to father thousands of children over your lifetime...
or, on the other hand, what if one of the ladies had been raped and didn't want to run the risk of having a child to the rapist.
The ppl posting here can easily be divided into two groups, Those who are annoyed at the use of the term "murder" in reference to mornning after pills and are generally pro choice.
And the other group are i'm guessing, guys that aren't getting sex and are therefore calling all girls who are getting sex "****es" for not controlling themselves......