• Secure your account

    A friendly reminder to our users, please make sure your account is safe. Make sure you update your password and have an active email address to recover or change your password.

  • Xenforo Cloud has scheduled an upgrade to XenForo version 2.2.16. This will take place on or shortly after the following date and time: Jul 05, 2024 at 05:00 PM (PT) There shouldn't be any downtime, as it's just a maintenance release. More info here

3D movies that's not worth the 3D?

SuperJediHero

Superhero
Joined
Jul 24, 2002
Messages
6,077
Reaction score
0
Points
31
Man, Man of Steel 3D was awful in 3D, NO 3D effects whatsoever!

I am just wondering if there is a website that compiles these horrible 3D effect movies?
 
In another words, a website that list which movies are shot in 3D, and which are post-converted and sucks. And which are post-converted but actually good?
 
In another words, a website that list which movies are shot in 3D, and which are post-converted and sucks. And which are post-converted but actually good?

Jurassic Park. The best 3D since Avatar.
 
i think not one 3d movie in 2013 was filmed with 3D cameras. all post converted.

hollywood is doing it right?
 
Last edited:
In another words, a website that list which movies are shot in 3D, and which are post-converted and sucks. And which are post-converted but actually good?

Haven't seen it myself, but I've only heard positive things about the 3D-conversion of Titanic
 
yeah the 3D titanic was good the behind the scenes stuff on the blu ray they showed stuff that was in 3D that I did not even notices like facial features of actors in certain shots etc.
 
Movies that i have seen and which just wasn't the worth it. Often when watching the movies listed below i would remove my 3-d glasses to see if the scenes were blurred and i would see the scenes would often just be crystal clear.
Avengers
Wrath of the Titans
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 2
Toy Story 3
Clash of The Titans


And basically everything pre-Avatar
 
I have yet to see a film where the experience was enhanced by 3D. So far it's only been Priest, Iron Man 3, and Man of Steel, and I thought they were all worse off for it.
 
I've heard Clash of the Titans was literally the worst ever.
Jurassic Park looked really good in 3D though.
 
A better question would be what movies are enhanced by 3D since they are the exception to the rule.

Almost all 3D movies have no enhancement from 3D.
 
I'm a fan of 3-D. Some of them aren't worth it though. I saw Clash of the Titans in 3-D and it was pointless.

Saying none of them are worth it is absurd though. I'm most definitely not on the "I hate 3-D" bandwagon.
 
I haven't seen many of them in 3D but, I wasn't that impressed by Jurassic Park in 3D simply because it wasn't shot to lend itself to 3D. I will say, the 3D in Transformers: Dark of the Moon and The Amazing Spider-Man was awesome. Especially these shots.


And...

 
I saw the film as is, but I never saw a point to seeing The Great Gatsby in 3D.
 
All of them mostly
The only movies I saw which 3D was worth it were Avatar and Tron Legacy ( and I am kind with Tron because I am a fan ).
 
The only 3D movies I had a good experience with were:

Star Trek Into Darkness
How to Rrain Your Dragon
Avatar

I've nearly walked out of every other one I've seen. At this point, I've vowed to only going to 2D showings.
 
Star Wars The Phantom Menace.
 
No it's not easy.

I've avoided some movies in the theater because there was no 2d option.

But im also glad to report that in my country at least , it's definitely a fade that is losing strength.

The answer is obviously , all of them. Even the only one that's actually well made , Hugo , the 2d version is much better.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"