Discussion in 'Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen' started by [A], Jun 15, 2009.
Please, please, please, let it bomb!
So Cameron can pick it up and give us The Transformers Generation One
that was funny
something many people don't understand is this is one movie that is "hated" and loved for the same reasons
except from different perspectives
I agree. A fun article.
It effectively captures the schizophrenic dichotomy of the TF movie franchise and its love-it-or-hate-it qualities.
I would have taken a rather Batman Begins-ish approach with Transformers.
Action and Thought... good mix of both...
I don't care if it's a kids show. Batman was a kids comic book.
Cameron's not a Godsend; am I the only one in here that thinks that???
And what a lame title for a movie.
Plus...I think Bay was the right choice for Transformers; granted Michael Bay knows **** about storytelling, but then again, these movies should be all about giant robots, and they are. Sure the first one had no big TF action until sixty minutes in, but that was for budget purposes.
For Transformers, story is last on the list, imo. It's not meant to be in the same category of The Dark Knight.
And also, it won't bomb. So far, it's been getting mixed to positive reviews, much like the first film.
it's actually because of bay that it does as well as it does
(ahem GI JOE)
whats with people wanting generation one so bad the looks looked kinda powerangerish and the new models are better imo
That's because we didn't get a Michael Bay's Iron Man.
I bet if it was directed by him, the armors would have been disgusting, but people like you would have liked them anyway just because you just accept what they swallow in your mouths.
Prove it. Cuz almost every Batman comic made from the 80's till now is full on adult.
Oh and by the way....G1 would never ever work. Ever. I can assure you no one wants to see colorful boxes run around....
Oh, and BTW, my problem with Bayformers doesn't lie just on the designs.
The characters, the jokes, the camera shakes and the plots are all crap.
The only thing I owe to Bay is his photography.
G1 can be worked out to look less boxy and more detailed:
And this is just a drawing.
I bet in ILM's CGI it would be wonderful.
Prime is the only cool G1 former...the rest are hidious. I hate them all.
It's just a matter of work. With more details and darker textures, every G1 can look cool.
This is just an example of how much better G1 can look vs the animated series:
^ that's very good -- who made that ?
5. Megan Fox and Shia Labeouf
For God's sake, audiences have had enough of these two ******s, and they've only been in one movie together. Trix the Rabbit is a better actor than Megan Fox and Shia LaBeouf has relied on his 'flustered' look for far too long. Neither one of them can deliver a line with any sort of sincerity, and they don't even look like they belong together. They had zero chemistry in the original and it will probably be the same for the sequel. Everytime Megan shows up on screen guys have to go get checked for STD's and Shia is so overrated that audiences are sick of looking at his ****face. Expect these two to meander their way through another movie.
That's E. J. SU's artwork from IDW publishing.
Haaaaaate it. Actually...I hate all japanese style robots....gross.
Here's another one. Remember that I'm not saying this should be the final designs. You should take them as concept art.
I like it. You can actually tell what the hell is going on.
Because they're pictures.
And Klaus Scherwinski's also a good painter.
Good art...but still hate it.