terry78
My name is Stefan, sweet thang
- Joined
- Mar 8, 2004
- Messages
- 88,379
- Reaction score
- 8,385
- Points
- 203
The solution to which is an outright banning of guns? So only the military, police and criminals have guns. Okay.
Reads comments...looks at what is going on in Venezuela.
Yeah you and your little pea shooter really have a chance against the military. And you're the one in the racism thread defending police shootings. Don't give me that crap that people need guns to defend themselves against the police. You would say the police were justified in their shooting if the "suspect" had a gun.
And no, not an outright ban. But something would be a good start.
Saying "something has to be done" without any suggestion for what that something would be is pointless. But your first comment was that this is the fault of adults who wouldn't give up their guns. Kendrick Castillo enjoyed hunting. I'll assume he used a gun to do so ( to be fair he could have used a bow). By your logic, he's to blame for his own death for not giving up his gun as much or more than the mentally ill person who stole a gun and took it to school to do harm.
I wasn't suggesting people need guns for defense from the police. I was attempting to point out who would be left armed if private citizens were not allowed gun ownership as you suggested.
Fall in line with the rest of the worlds gun laws, of which the majority of developed countries enjoy the exact same freedoms that the USA enjoys.
Or don't you know.. whatever, keep your guns & we'll see you back here in another 3-6 weeks when the next fatal mass shooting happens to repeat the conversation over again.
Sooner or later, there will be someone killed in one of these senseless acts that is the right person ie the son/daughter, brother/sister, father/mother of someone with some actual clout that can kickstart something to overhaul the US gun laws.
Yeah you and your little pea shooter really have a chance against the military. And you're the one in the racism thread defending police shootings. Don't give me that crap that people need guns to defend themselves against the police. You would say the police were justified in their shooting if the "suspect" had a gun.
And no, not an outright ban. But something would be a good start.
Absolutely.RIP Kendrick Castillo.
Of course gun nuts try to appropriate him and his actions.Kendrick Castillo enjoyed hunting.....
Yes, the armed person is more dangerous.Do you think a responsible gun owner is more dangerous than a guy on mushrooms?
We've already been through possible solutions in the Guns thread. I'm not rehashing all of the arguments here because it is pointless. People like you will always find a fault in any solution.