I agree and disagree to an extent, I thought Trips was a good promo and understood how to get over the magnitude of a match or feud, conversely the Rock would stand out there for 10 minutes rambling through Corny t-shirt catchphrases and saying nothing, and way too often he'd essentially belittle his opponent and thus make the match seem less than. What do both have in common? They both love the sound of their own voice and talk too long, give me Dusty, Foley and Punk any day, entertaining while bringing realistic emotion to their feuds.
Triple H is a mixed bag, between '99 and 2008/9 he was a great performer, but due to his power brought about by marriage he stayed at the top way too long as WWE pushed the narrative that he was on the level of the elites, and eventually made him into a guy that only wrestled at Wrestlemania or maybe SummerSlam, but he was never a draw on the level of Hogan, Austin or Roman, or even Cena, and he was never the special in-ring talent that Savage, Flair, Bret and Shawn were, and he's not the legend the Undertaker is, so rolling him out as a special attraction every Mania was disingenuous at best, a grotesque example of the Victor's controlling history. I think Cornette said it best, Triple H was a very good performer, but he was never the guy, he's the guy who worked with the guy.
Now I think he's done good job overall in the last 3 to 4 years, but let's not forget "the Authority" years, where him and his wife drained the life out of WWE with the most boring, self *****ing heel entity in history, Stephanie in particular didn't understand how to be a heel, as obnoxious as Vince was he understood the heel has to get his comeuppance, whether it was Austin making him piss himself, DX shoving his head in Big Show's sweaty ass crack, or being shaved bald at Wrestlemania, there was always a pay-off, Stephanie spent years emasculating wrestlers with zero pay-off.
I also think part of his credit as booker comes down to how far the bar was lowered by Vince over the last 10+ years as senility kicked in, WWE spent nearly a decade of the main angle being Vince vs the fans, consistently booking against what they wanted. I stopped watching in 2014 when Punk left, Bryan had his first retirement and they prematurely split the Shield because Vince had a ***** for Roman, I wasn't sticking around for a WWE built around him after 10 years of tolerating Cena, just to hate-watch, as let's not get it twisted, for 4 years Roman has been great, and the box office star in pro wrestling, but for the first 6 years he was a dull as dishwater face with go away heat who was shoved down everybody's throats because Vince got off on angering the fans. So all Trips had to do was remove the toxicity and start listening to the fans for the most part, you can't just book for the whims of the fans, but deliberately booking against them is suicide for the business, and Trips understood that and now there's a feeling of less of a glass ceiling, no malice booking and trying to appeal to both the hardcore pro wrestling fans and the casual WWE fans, an admittedly tough task for anyone.
I've probably bored you to death with the length of this lol