Abuse of Power Thread (Cops, Governments, Etc.) - Part 2

Well either the door was locked/closed or it wasn't. She didn't break it down. So it was unlocked/ajar or he opened it. If he answered the door she would have realized it wasn't her apartment. So it was ajar like she claims or he opened it. She had no reason to shoot him unless she knew him and was angry or something.
Toxicology will be interesting. Not every relationship is known to neighbors, friends or family. If I was her and I shot a guy who jilted or dumped me or cheated on me in a fit of rage -- I might want to claim it was a simple case of misunderstanding/wrong address. Her story likely won't hold up -- unless by some weird chance it is true.
 
A simple look at his and her social media accounts and phones would solve that immediately. I'm sure if there was something they would have announced a connection by now. Whatever their relationship was or was not she had no reason or right to shoot him.
 
Who said she did? Nobody is claiming that. LOL. It's the whole "she was a racist and shot him because his music was to loud" that sounds absurd to me. She either made the biggest mistake of her life in thinking she was at her own place or she knew him in some way -- which will come out because of her phone and computer and security cameras.
 
That is the first I have seen she was a) racist or b) shooting him because of loud music. Both sound like social media rumors made up to give the story that extra bite of controversy.
 
I agree. Sounds like something to spice up the story. Whether they knew each other more than as just occasional passing neighbors will 100% be found out. Whether she was high will come out. She will be fired, sued and probably go to jail. I just want to know if he opened the door. I would never open my door to a loud person I didn't know. I'd just call the cops. Not in 2018 I wouldn't. Too many crazies out there. If the door was ajar that's a mistake any of us could make. Occasionally I wake up in the morning and realized I left my door unlocked and thank the stars I was lucky. This thing about "It's impossible for the door not to lock" is BS. I've seen many, many a door that is supposed to automatically shut and lock fail to do store in buildings where they are supposed to. Hospitals, hotels, nursing homes, condos.....
 
Well either the door was locked/closed or it wasn't. She didn't break it down. So it was unlocked/ajar or he opened it. If he answered the door she would have realized it wasn't her apartment. So it was ajar like she claims or he opened it. She had no reason to shoot him unless she knew him and was angry or something.
Toxicology will be interesting. Not every relationship is known to neighbors, friends or family. If I was her and I shot a guy who jilted or dumped me or cheated on me in a fit of rage -- I might want to claim it was a simple case of misunderstanding/wrong address. Her story likely won't hold up -- unless by some weird chance it is true.

Except she may be getting help on her story from those that would be investigating it.
 
No maybe about it. Her story has changed multiple times.
 
And cops are supposedly trained to remember detail and facts better than civilians which makes this all the more suspicious.
 
One of the local news stations tried to do some lowkey character assassination by saying the cops found weed in the dude's apartment.
 
I think at this point if the most criminal drug they find is weed, they need to just let it go. It is almost laughable where it's legal in some form in 30 states now.
 
Well, really it's about how the media always tries to find a way to justify why these people deserved to get killed by the cops.
 
law_Norder1.jpg
 
So while 5 police had really been shot, she fakes her own shooting and then blames a black man further stirring up racial tensions and all of this so that she can the attention and disability payments... Yeah, thats ****ing crazy. She deserves every one of those 15 years.
 
42999671_10156933245651800_4749984257416364032_n.jpg


^Carol Anderson, author of "One Person, No Vote"
 
Police officers in the US were charged with more than 400 rapes over a 9-year period

And that is only what is reported on. It's nearly impossible to extrapolate just how many sexual assaults cops commit amongst other crimes that are either covered up by fellow officers or never reported on.

A police officer in Prince George's County, Maryland, was charged this week with raping a woman during a traffic stop. He's pleaded not guilty, but it's a disturbing headline -- even more disturbing when you consider there are hundreds more like him.

Yes, hundreds. According to research from Bowling Green State University, police officers in the US were charged with forcible rape 405 times between 2005 and 2013. That's an average of 45 a year. Forcible fondling was more common, with 636 instances.

Yet experts say those statistics are, by no means, comprehensive. Data on sexual assaults by police are almost nonexistent, they say.

"It's just not available at all," said Jonathan Blanks, a research associate with the Cato Institute's Project on Criminal Justice. "You can only crowdsource this info."

The BGSU researchers compiled their list by documenting cases of sworn nonfederal law enforcement officers who have been arrested. But the 2016 federally funded paper, "Police Integrity Lost: A Study of Law Enforcement Officers Arrested," says the problem isn't limited to sexual assault.

"There are no comprehensive statistics available on problems with police integrity," the report says, and no government entity collects data on police who are arrested.

It adds, "Police sexual misconduct and cases of police sexual violence are often referred to as hidden offenses, and studies on police sexual misconduct are usually based on small samples or derived from officer surveys that are threatened by a reluctance to reveal these cases."

The nation's foremost researchers on the subject, thus, must often rely on published media reports. The BGSU numbers, for instance, are the result of Google alerts on 48 search terms entered by researchers. The scholars then follow each case through adjudication.

While those numbers represent a fair portion of cases, arrests rely on a victim making a report and a law enforcement agency making that report public, after an arrest or otherwise. With sexual assaults by police officers, neither is guaranteed.

Why the numbers are lacking

One of the greatest impediments to understanding the scope of police sexual assault is the victims' reluctance to report the crime.

"Who do you call when your rapist or offender is a police officer? What a scary situation that must be," said Philip Stinson, an associate professor of criminal justice who served as principal investigator for the police integrity paper and whose research assistants maintain the BGSU database.

No one interviewed for this story could give an estimate, even ballpark, on how underreported these types of crimes might be.

"I have to think it's a much worse problem than my data suggests," said Stinson, himself a former police officer.

There are several reasons behind the muddy data. The federal government cannot compel states to make the nation's 18,000 law enforcement agencies report the numbers. Even if they could, the Justice Department wouldn't have the resources to oversee and maintain such a database, Blanks said.

Unions also work hard to protect police officers and their reputations, he said.

"They don't want their officers and membership shamed if something goes wrong," Blanks said.

There also can be legal hurdles to obtaining basic information in such cases, he said, "and that's on purpose." Some states' laws shield the identities of police officers who commit crimes, he said, while some jurisdictions include nondisclosure agreements in victim settlements.

"The system is rigged to protect police officers from outside accountability," Blanks said. "The worst cops are going to get the most protection."

Victims include suspects and those police are supposed to protect

What data is available paints a jarring picture. One statistic from Stinson indicates that for every sexual assault that makes the news, there are almost always more victims -- on average, five more.

About half of the victims are children, researchers say. Stinson has gotten accustomed to hearing his research assistants proclaim during their work, "Oh my God, it's another 14-year-old."

Victims can include both the people police are supposed to be chasing and those they're charged with protecting, according to the police integrity paper.

"Opportunities for sex-related police crime abound because officers operate in a low visibility environment with very little supervision," it says. "The potential victims of sex-related police crime include criminal suspects but also unaccompanied victims of crime."

Experts say officers who prey on people they encounter while on duty take advantage of the trust the public places in police as an institution.

"Police have a reputational advantage over anyone, especially someone accused of a crime," Blanks said, explaining that a regular Gallup poll shows again and again that police are third only to the military and small business owners in terms of trust. "People want to believe the police."

Offenders who seek to victimize people know this, experts say, and they strategically select victims, bolstering their chances of not getting caught.

Researchers find that a predominance of the victims fall into at least one of several categories: They have criminal records, are homeless, are sex workers or have issues with drug or alcohol abuse. Essentially, predatory cops are "picking on people who juries won't believe or who don't trust police," Stinson said.

The ripple effect

To be clear: The majority of police officers are good people, not sexual predators. Every expert interviewed for this story concurs on this point. But the problem is much larger than individual officers, said author and former Seattle Police Chief Norm Stamper.

"I think it's a huge problem," he said. "In reality, there's probably no law enforcement agency that has not had this problem."

The ripple effect can be devastating to a community. Stamper, who was a policeman in San Diego for 28 years before taking the helm in Seattle in 1994, recalled when California Highway Patrol officer Craig Peyer was convicted of the on-duty killing of student Cara Knott after a traffic stop.

No San Diego officer was tangentially involved, yet the department experienced enormous trust issues with the community, he said. Residents were fearful and some motorists were anxious about being pulled over, said Stamper, whose books address the "dark side" of policing and how to fix it.

"It cheats good cops," he said. "If a police officer is arrested for having fondled a DUI suspect in a jurisdiction, that affects all officers."

The trust issue is only exacerbated by the "blue wall" of silence that's erected when an officer is accused of a crime, he said. That's to be expected, Stamper said, because officers rely heavily on each other, especially in dangerous situations, and ratting out a colleague could mean trouble for an officer the next time she or he needs backup.

"If I'm a snitch, then the chance that my fellow officers will not have my back is significant," the former police chief said.

Some possible solutions

Stamper and others believe the solution lies in revamping police culture.

"The paramilitary, bureaucratic structure produces a dysfunctional culture," Stamper said, adding that for one of the "most delicate and demanding" jobs in America, officers largely go unsupervised.

Specific to sexual assault, experts would like to see departments enact:
  • Policies "to make victims feel safe," Stinson said, which could include online or anonymous reporting and special officers trained in dealing with sexual assault victims
  • GPS tracking of officers, especially those with take-home vehicles, and monitoring of officers. If a supervisor notices a patrolman predominantly stops women between the ages of 18 and 30 at the same time of night in the same part of town, it would raise red flags
  • Rules forbidding departments from hiring officers who were fired from other agencies, which happens too frequently, Stamper said
  • Mandates that officers must activate their bodycams and dash cams and be punished if they don't. (This will actually vindicate officers more often than not, experts say)
  • Occasional sting operations, involving internal affairs, aimed at ensuring police officers are appropriately interacting with the public
"It's critical supervisors trust officers, but trust is earned," Stamper said, adding that the job is too important to trust officers blindly.

Police chiefs and sheriffs defending bad cops also erodes trust, Stamper said. He finds himself frustrated, he said, every time he sees a police executive step to a podium to decry the "bad apples" responsible for a crime that has tainted a department.

"If they repeatedly go back to that bank of microphones to bemoan the bad apples, it's time to look at the barrel. ... Look at the orchard," he said.

Are national standards in order?

Accountability is critical to changing police culture, experts say.

Stamper believes uniformity -- via the licensing of individual officers and the certification of police departments -- is key.

All 18,000 departments operate under their own rules, based on their traditions, policies, procedures and recruitment methods, he said. He believes creating national standards -- not for small things, but for larger constitutional issues -- could improve the quality of policing.

If a licensed officer were to violate someone's rights -- by illegally searching or arresting them, manipulating evidence, using unnecessary force or, of course, engaging in sexually predatory behavior -- that officer's license would be yanked.

Likewise, a city police department with a pattern of violations could lose its certification and be taken over the by the county. An offending sheriff's department could be taken over by the state, he said.

It's pie in the sky, Stamper acknowledges, but until America changes the nature of the conversation around policing, things are destined to remain the same when it comes to crooked cops.

"The forces of resistance are powerful," he said. "If you push the system, it's going to push back with equal or greater force."
CNN
 
42999671_10156933245651800_4749984257416364032_n.jpg


^Carol Anderson, author of "One Person, No Vote"



All of this is basically excuses, with an easy fix. Make IDs free, on the government dime, and available either online or if you don't have internet access they'll come out to you, like with the census.

Just take the onus off the actual poor citizens to go get it, the government can do this and it won't cost all that much in the scheme of things. There'll just be another moving of the goalposts though, anyone opposed to it will find some other whiney reason it shouldn't happen.

I actually don't think fraudulent voting is that big of a deal - it probably happens, but it's not the epidemic the Trumpies make it out to be. Thing is, there are other countries that do the ID thing. It's not a big deal, so long as it's free and it's the actual government doing all the legwork for it so people aren't put out of their way. Plus, you shut up all the Trumpies whineing about voter fraud in the process, they won't be able to claim it anymore.
 
Except there's a very large and very vocal part of the right that opposes a National ID card. The honest answer has been that the actual opposition for National ID comes from the Right in the last 40-50 years because it's linked to Libertarian fever dreams of government overreach and with Evangelical paranoia based on their reading of Revelation and Rapture theology. Now there's a bit of pushback because of the false "voter fraud" narrative but if one has actually paid attention to the Right's view on this subject there's more than few clear reasons it's been a boogieman for GOP voters and even elected officals:

1. As mentioned it's was, long before RFD chips, the go to idea of "the Mark Of The Beast".

2. It's something that smacks of "socialist" Europe.

3. Frankly if there was a national ID card businesses wouldn't have a fig leaf to hide behind to cover up their hiring of illegal immigrants. Always remember, the reason illegals come here is not to commit crimes or live off the government teat. It's to work. And they KNOW they will find work because big business does all it can to ensure they have had a populace they can pay like **** and can treat like ****. But we'll never even get to having a firm grasp on this issue until more Americans realize that the issue isn't the illegals but the businesses that hire them. And unfortunately no one is inclined to go against powerful business interests, especially within the Republican Party. So the scapegoating of illegals themselves continues while the core reason they come is ignored.
 
The addition to that is if businesses had to start hiring American workers only and not immigrants, wages and the costs of goods would skyrocket. The Right hates to admit that and they put on a face about getting rid of "the illegals" but would balk at doing any of the work immigrants do and especially at the pay they receive.
 
It was only a matter of time before this happened. Or rather, happened publically enough to make the news.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
200,548
Messages
21,758,609
Members
45,593
Latest member
Jeremija
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"