Thread Manager
Moderator
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2011
- Messages
- 0
- Reaction score
- 7
- Points
- 1
This is a continuation thread, the old thread is [split]489617[/split]
Singer is competent, but I think Matthew Vaughn is superior.
Singer is competent, but I think Matthew Vaughn is superior.
X2 and DOFP >>>>>> First Class. All great movies but I give Singer the edge.
I like Vaughn and was looking forward to his DOFP, but Singer coming back to direct X-Men was always my first choice.
But to take it back to the topic at hand, this will be Snyder's magnum opus, people will have no choice but to respect him after BvS.
Why wouldn't they respect him yet? Honestly, after 300 and Watchmen, you pretty much got all of what he's about (and to be fair, the Owl Movie as well)….so you either like it (and/or parts of it) or don't.
If it does I am not coming back to this thread until tomorrow.ISS's hypothetical comparison is going to turn into a twenty page discussion about Singer, isn't it?
X2 and DOFP >>>>>> First Class. All great movies but I give Singer the edge.
I like Vaughn and was looking forward to his DOFP, but Singer coming back to direct X-Men was always my first choice.
But to take it back to the topic at hand, this will be Snyder's magnum opus, people will have no choice but to respect him after BvS.
ISS's hypothetical comparison is going to turn into a twenty page discussion about Singer, isn't it?
X2 is Singer's. First Class and DOFP are Vaughn's babies. Notice how they both tied X-Men to American history? Only reason Singer directed it was because Vaughn also came up with Kingsmen and chose to do that.
Singer didn't get story credit for DOFP. Vaughn did. He's a way better director and writer.
And if that's the case, then they still won't. It's not like the subject of Batman or Superman somehow overrules that. Even less so if it happens to suck.Because they don't.
Its been well documented ever since he was given the keys to the car.
ISS's hypothetical comparison is going to turn into a twenty page discussion about Singer, isn't it?
Why wouldn't they respect him yet? Honestly, after 300 and Watchmen, you pretty much got all of what he's about (and to be fair, the Owl Movie as well) .so you either like it (and/or parts of it) or don't.
Yes lets get back to talking about how nobody should ever say anything complimentary about the director who is directing the ****ing movie we are discussing.
Trapped in time had a good JL lineup
Superman
Batman
Robin
Wonder Woman
The Flash
Aquaman
Cyborg
So that Singer guy... he really sucks doesn't he?
And this is where I believe the particular problem lies. Snyder made his name by working on a comic book movies. Out of every genre, the kind that includes most difficult and hard to please fanbase there is. If you think about it, Snyder actually brought it upon himself.t:
Live by the (plastic) sword, die by it, right?t:
I think it's also one of the reasons why the owl movie is rather refreshing, in not being so mainstream-comic oriented.
And if that's the case, then they still won't. It's not like the subject of Batman or Superman somehow overrules that. Even less so if it happens to suck.
I just want this movie to kick absolute ass
Something so good that all fans say "Wow, all jokes aside, DC really stepped it up with this movie."
Is that really too much to ask for? It seems like WB is pulling out all the stops to make this movie the best it can be.