titansupes
Avenger
- Joined
- Dec 11, 2010
- Messages
- 11,628
- Reaction score
- 1,870
- Points
- 103
I'm loving that intensity from Affleck. 

I LOVE that all the devastation in the battle with Zod in MoS that was criticized at the time as "excessive" is absolutely pivotal to this plot, and the drama of this film. Pretty sweet irony.
I LOVE that all the devastation in the battle with Zod in MoS that was criticized at the time as "excessive" is absolutely pivotal to this plot, and the drama of this film. Pretty sweet irony.
"He has the power to wipe out the entire human race and if we can't with absolute certainty say that there is a 1% chance he's not our enemy then we need to take that chance."
Batfleck sold that well.
It is quite possible the negativity created this story setup somewhat.Perhaps that critique influenced the story we got. MOS took the heat, though many other films never answer in superhero genre for that issue. I think it helped inspire the story we are getting after MOS got singled out ridiculously. In a way, I'm glad people were unfair this time![]()
I love it.
Critics after MOS: Too much destruction! So many fictional people died! Why did they do this?
Snyder and co: Really? HERE'S AN ENTIRE MOVIE ALL ABOUT THAT S***
Double-down Snyder. That's what i'm calling him.


Is that actually doubling down though, or is it addressing the critcism through the BvS plot to cut back on the negative critiquing this time around? Either way, I think we end up with a great concept out of the MOS backlash that was experienced on the destruction aspects.I love it.
Critics after MOS: Too much destruction! So many fictional people died! Why did they do this?
Snyder and co: Really? HERE'S AN ENTIRE MOVIE ALL ABOUT THAT S***
Double-down Snyder. That's what i'm calling him.
Regarding the MOS being a part of the plot here, here's what Snyder recently said about the Metropolis destruction:
"I stand by it, because for me, I've always said when I was working on Watchmen and maybe it's sort of left over from a Watchmen philosophical sort of thing - that there should be consequences to superheroes' interaction with the Earth. That was kind of the way that we approached Man of Steel. I wanted a big consequence to Superman's arrival on earth. Certainly, Batman v Superman sort of cashes in all its chips on the 'why' of that destruction."
And I completely agree with this.
Addressing the criticism doesn't negate its validity.

Is that actually doubling down though, or is it addressing the critcism through the BvS plot to cut back on the negative critiquing this time around? Either way, I think we end up with a great concept out of the MOS backlash that was experienced on the destruction aspects.
When man starts speaking in percents you know he's gone outta his mind.![]()

Official TV Spot 3 & 4.
[YT]watch?v=_peXtNpuIJs[/YT]
Me either. As I said in the first post earlier I made about this, a lot of superhero films other than MOS gets a pass on this anyways. The criticism that MOS got I think absolutely affected the direction of BvS, in a way it would likely have not gone otherwise I think.Never saw the problem with the destruction. A rookie Superman faced with an extinction level threat. It wasn't like he was an old hand at being a super hero. Mistakes were made, and it fit with the story.
When man starts speaking in percents you know he's gone outta his mind.![]()
Can't wait to see him bring this rage in a suit.
Regarding the MOS being a part of the plot here, here's what Snyder recently said about the Metropolis destruction:
"I stand by it, because for me, I've always said when I was working on Watchmen and maybe it's sort of left over from a Watchmen philosophical sort of thing - that there should be consequences to superheroes' interaction with the Earth. That was kind of the way that we approached Man of Steel. I wanted a big consequence to Superman's arrival on earth. Certainly, Batman v Superman sort of cashes in all its chips on the 'why' of that destruction."
And I completely agree with this.
Maybe. But we're in the TFA age, where movies evidently should be evaluated with respect to the big picture, and not the individual parts.