Whiskey Tango
Avenger
- Joined
- Jun 29, 2007
- Messages
- 25,209
- Reaction score
- 3
- Points
- 31
Who said short movies are absolutely better? All people are getting at is you don't HAVE to have a three hour run time to have a good movie, and that longer is not necessarily better. It's about the content.
I'd be a little concerned if it were less than two hours, but I don't see how 2:10 is cause for panic. Yes 2:30 would be great but if those extra minutes are just filler then there's no point.
I really think some of you don't quite grok how much can happen in a minute, or even 5 minutes onscreen. Try timing a few of your favorite scenes next time you watch something. It's longer than you think.
I'd be a little concerned if it were less than two hours, but I don't see how 2:10 is cause for panic. Yes 2:30 would be great but if those extra minutes are just filler then there's no point.
I really think some of you don't quite grok how much can happen in a minute, or even 5 minutes onscreen. Try timing a few of your favorite scenes next time you watch something. It's longer than you think.
Last edited:
I can't believe that people are concerned that a movie is NOT over 2 hours and 10 minutes (or however long it is). How about you watch the movie first and then ***** about it being too short. You have no idea what the pacing is going to be like and you have no idea how much time is going to be allotted to different scenes. If we go see the movie and it turns out that it did seem kind of rushed in places, then yeah you might have a valid point. I understand that this movie is very important to us fans that have been wanting a movie like this for years, but quite frankly the studio couldn't care less about that.
t:






.