- Joined
- Jun 13, 2011
- Messages
- 1,460
- Reaction score
- 1,579
- Points
- 103
I'm a little confused at the continued argument over superman killing zod....one argument is that people don't like johnathan kent saying young Clark should've maybe let those people die and on the other hand, when Clark chooses to kill in order to save people, everyone loses their minds!
When it comes down to it, police make that terrible decision everyday to shoot an armed criminal who won't lower their weapon and is threatening the lives of others. Now, the argument could be made that superman should be above humans but how would people react if he let zod do it? He'd be called a softy or that he didn't care. It's a realistic decision. Superman made it and onviously felt remorse so he's not a monster.
When it comes down to it, police make that terrible decision everyday to shoot an armed criminal who won't lower their weapon and is threatening the lives of others. Now, the argument could be made that superman should be above humans but how would people react if he let zod do it? He'd be called a softy or that he didn't care. It's a realistic decision. Superman made it and onviously felt remorse so he's not a monster.