Thread Manager
Moderator
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2011
- Messages
- 0
- Reaction score
- 3
- Points
- 1
This is a continuation thread, the old thread is [split]479279[/split]
I have called no one a hater. Dislike the film all you want. But to say, "the stakes weren't shown" in the film is false. Plain and simple.
And yes, you can't just say that it's all subjective and about one's feelings and then turn around and wave the pretty useless RT score of the film.
Tell me you disliked the film and what about it FELT off, why it didn't appeal to you? Fine. Tell me that the film didn't have X, Y or Z when it clearly did? That's another story.
Alright. I FELT as though there were no stakes during the final battle. To ME, it FELT like two superhumans simply brawling in a large city. I did not FEEL the same level of excitement or thrill as I felt in the climaxes of the TDK trilogy or the Avengers. That is how I FELT. To say otherwise is simply false.
I also do not "hate" or "dislike" the film, it's more that I was disappointed by it. No one was as hyped for MoS as myself. Maybe my expectations were too high.
Alright. I FELT as though there were no stakes during the final battle. To ME, it FELT like two superhumans simply brawling in a large city. I did not FEEL the same level of excitement or thrill as I felt in the climaxes of the TDK trilogy or the Avengers. That is how I FELT. To say otherwise is simply false.
I also do not "hate" or "dislike" the film, it's more that I was disappointed by it. No one was as hyped for MoS as myself. Maybe my expectations were too high.
You don't have to though, because they're not going to change your position. Just because people had a different opinion than yours doesn't mean you have to get to the bottom of it.Alright, horses and colors and all that... So, the scenes and moments I pointed out, where we are given visually, through dialog and exposition what the stakes are, why do you feel they were off. I'm not messing with you. Truly, what about those moments was not enough, or seemed lacking to you? Elucidate your position. Again, I actually do understand many of the criticisms of the film, even though I don't share them. This is a new one to me. Help me to understand where you are coming from with this critique.
I don't want to drag on this debate about the final battle of MoS (although there are several reasons I believe it wasn't up to par).
I will say that unlike the final battle, the first flight scene was exhilarating. I actually felt a sense of awe, and it felt as though I myself am flying for the first time. It was the best scene in the film, for me. You don't have to look any farther than that scene to understand why I feel the final battle was uninspired. It lacked heart, while the first flight scene was full of heart.
I don't want to drag on this debate about the final battle of MoS (although there are several reasons I believe it wasn't up to par).
I will say that unlike the final battle, the first flight scene was exhilarating. I actually felt a sense of awe, and it felt as though I myself am flying for the first time. It was the best scene in the film, for me. You don't have to look any farther than that scene to understand why I feel the final battle was uninspired. It lacked heart, while the first flight scene was full of heart.
I agree with you. I find myself sort of having a mixed to negative perception of the final battle. The fight on the ground where Clark is trying to stop Zod from destroying more **** is interesting. But, the moment where Zod takes the battle to the skies, that's when it "jumped the shark" for me, so to speak. It starts to look a little silly, unbelievable and had crappy CGI compared to previous fight scenes.
DA said something in the other thread before it closed that I wanted to respond to:
"Hiring Terrio can be interpreted as a response to MoS criticisms."
This is what I'm looking for when I talked about Snyder responding to the right criticisms. This is a great response to them. A number of complaints can fall under the "script" umbrella, so he's killing a few birds with one stone. This is an appropriate response instead of say... him cutting out all the major action scenes or dramatically lightening the tone ASM2 style.
Yeah. This definitely earns him some respect from me. That he isn't above, and won't deny criticism. I do wonder how much Ben Affleck had to do with this decision though.DA said something in the other thread before it closed that I wanted to respond to:
"Hiring Terrio can be interpreted as a response to MoS criticisms."
This is what I'm looking for when I talked about Snyder responding to the right criticisms. This is a great response to them. A number of complaints can fall under the "script" umbrella, so he's killing a few birds with one stone. This is an appropriate response instead of say... him cutting out all the major action scenes or dramatically lightening the tone ASM2 style.
DA said something in the other thread before it closed that I wanted to respond to:
"Hiring Terrio can be interpreted as a response to MoS criticisms."
This is what I'm looking for when I talked about Snyder responding to the right criticisms. This is a great response to them. A number of complaints can fall under the "script" umbrella, so he's killing a few birds with one stone. This is an appropriate response instead of say... him cutting out all the major action scenes or dramatically lightening the tone ASM2 style.
Yeah, that doesn't look so good. I wonder why gave it a pass to be in the film.I'm referring to these scenes
![]()
![]()
To me it looks silly and painfully CGI compared to other fight scenes in the movie.
I'm referring to these scenes
![]()
![]()
To me it looks silly and painfully CGI compared to other fight scenes in the movie.
Who is really going to see that in the movie theater though?
Who is really going to see that in the movie theater though?
If they're not seeing anything then that's a problem.
Personally I had a hard time following the Zod fight.