"Alternative Fuels May Boost Pollution"

Discussion in 'SHH Community Forum' started by Carcharodon, Nov 13, 2007.

  1. Carcharodon Registered

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2001
    Messages:
    14,859
    Likes Received:
    0
    Duh? Something with the name, "Liquid coal," was expected to somehow reduce emissions? :whatever:
     
  2. Obi-Ron Deal with it

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2002
    Messages:
    12,123
    Likes Received:
    4
    This story is just a ruse to stop people from tearing their eyes from sweet, sweet oil.
     
  3. Carcharodon Registered

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2001
    Messages:
    14,859
    Likes Received:
    0
    No, actually, it has complete merrit. It was just written by Captain Obvious.
     
  4. Addendum Registered

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2004
    Messages:
    22,127
    Likes Received:
    0
    The new fuels, excluding liquid coal, all sound like they could work. But converting the current plants to use them, or having to build new plants to use the new fuels produce more pollution.

    Once that's in place, then the real savings in pollution happen. Everyone will probably be dead by then but it's the thought that counts.
     
  5. Mr Sparkle Registered

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2005
    Messages:
    14,530
    Likes Received:
    0
    like Stephen Merrit?:huh:
     
  6. Kritish Registered

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2005
    Messages:
    21,613
    Likes Received:
    0
    It's not like anyone was taking liquid coal seriously.
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"