Thread Manager
Moderator
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2011
- Messages
- 0
- Reaction score
- 3
- Points
- 1
This is a continuation thread, the old thread is [split]350555[/split]
Amy Adams will be Lois Lane
March 27, 2011 | 10:53 a.m.
This just in — three-time Oscar nominee Amy Adams will play journalist Lois Lane in Hollywood’s revival of Superman.
The 36-year-old star got the news on Sunday from director Zack Snyder, who phoned her from Paris, where he was promoting his just-opened film, “Sucker Punch.” There had been a crush of Hollywood interest in the lead female role in the Warner Bros. project but Snyder said that after meeting with Adams she was the clear choice to take on a character that dates back to 1938 and has long represented the strong, professional woman who can hold her own against any man – even if he can leap tall buildings in a single bound.
“There was a big, giant search for Lois,” Snyder said. “For us it was a big thing and obviously a really important role. We did a lot of auditioning but we had this meeting with Amy Adams and after that I just felt she was perfect for it.”
Snyder declined to discuss the precise prominence of Lois in the story or any plot details about the film but he said the role is “a linchpin” to the project and that he considers it essential that Lois — a Roosevelt-era creation – arrives on screen in 2012 with contemporary appeal and spirit.
“It goes back to what I’ve said about Superman and making him really understandable for today. What’s important to us is making him relevant and real and making him empathetic to today’s audience so that we understand the decisions he makes. That applies to Lois as well. She has to be in the same universe as him [in tone and substance].”
Adams has shown an affinity for finding the plucky but pitch-perfect center of old-school roles; in the cartoonish ”Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian” she brought a surprising amount of yearning emotion to the role of a simplified Amelia Earhart and she won rave reviews for the role of Giselle in “Enchanted” and it’s sly send-up of Disney princess traditions that date back to “Snow White,” which premiered just six months before Lois Lane hit newsstands in the pages of Action Comics No. 1.
Adams is coming off an Academy Award nomination for her work in ”The Fighter,” the David O. Russell that took her into far darker territory; she played a bartender named Charlene who is a fire-tested and fierce in her love for a down-but-not-out boxer portrayed by Mark Whalburg. The film earned an Oscar win for Christian Bale, who played Whalburg’s deliriously drugged-out brother, and he will be in the other big superhero film of 2012, “The Dark Knight Rises,” which will see Bale back in the cowl of Batman.
The big breakthrough for Adams was “Junebug,” which premiered at the 2005 Sundance Film Festival, where Adams won a special jury prize for her performance. The star’s other notable credits include ”Julie & Julia,” “Sunshine Cleaning,” “Charlie Wilson’s War.”
– Geoff Boucher
I'm starting to think that kids are stupid.
ya, she looks cute
.
.
.but isn't she a bit too old? she will look like an aunt in the sequel!
I think some are assuming that it's the start of a trilogy or something. It could end up that way, but I think they're treating it as one complete story first and foremost (doesn't mean they'll kill certain key people off, of course).Why is everyone so ageist on here?
Thread Manager is slowly becoming a Brainiac type entity.
The primary concern is probably to make this one Superman film as good as it can be with who they think would work best right now. The better it does (and the better that the legal issues work out), the better the chance for a sequel. But since no sequel is guaranteed, they can't really approach it as anything but a one-shot deal right now. If a sequel comes, then great...they'll deal with it IF it comes.
I think some are assuming that it's the start of a trilogy or something. It could end up that way, but I think they're treating it as one complete story first and foremost (doesn't mean they'll kill certain key people off, of course).
The primary concern is probably to make this one Superman film as good as it can be with who they think would work best right now. The better it does (and the better that the legal issues work out), the better the chance for a sequel. But since no sequel is guaranteed, they can't really approach it as anything but a one-shot deal right now. If a sequel comes, then great...they'll deal with it IF it comes.
I think some are assuming that it's the start of a trilogy or something. It could end up that way, but I think they're treating it as one complete story first and foremost (doesn't mean they'll kill certain key people off, of course).
Not me.That's what everyone fears. Even the ones supporting Adams' casting!
the new superman movie will soar high!!! must do really well!!!
it's just woman ages faster than man... i don't wanna see a repeat of Margot kidder case...
Not everything has to be, or is intended from the start, to be a trilogy. I don't get people think it should.
Again, if they were more concerned with the 'what if we get a sequel', they might have cast younger. But honestly, with the legal battle over the Superman rights et al...if it goes ore than one movie, it'll be more of a bonus than a predetermined given. So whatever they'd have to do...recast, CG..whatever...that doesn't have any real bearing on this one film, so they can't worry about what they haven't gotten yet.
It's like being behind in a 7-game series 3 games to 2. You have to do what you can to win this game, or there is no tomorrow. And if there is a tomorrow, then find a way to win that one too....but win this one first.
Those people are no better than those who suggest Bruce Willis for Lex Luthor because he is bald.Hopefully Adams can get the characterization down, and make up for what some people think is a more Lana than Lois look.