- Joined
- Aug 24, 2011
- Messages
- 68,577
- Reaction score
- 38,664
- Points
- 118
Why do I get the feeling this was a reference to what made the Parker-Cattrall feud public.
Why do I get the feeling this was a reference to what made the Parker-Cattrall feud public.
Just started Sex and the City for the first time. Still on season 1.
Now... Am I supposed to root for Carrie and Mr Big, or against them?
Just started Sex and the City for the first time. Still on season 1.
Now... Am I supposed to root for Carrie and Mr Big, or against them?
Enjoy. S1 feels so different from the rest of the series..or is just the pilot thats weird? I cant remember.
Hmmm even though this tv revival isn't that well received. This already lasted longer than the movies era (two movies from 2008 to 2010) and the CW prequel show which lasted for 2 seasons.
I wonder if they could keep this going for season 4 to 6 and eventually outlive the original HBO run?
Hmm I think the reception for second movie was the main factor. If it was as successful as the first one (or at least the box office), WB would have wanted to release Sex and the City 3 in 2012 or 2013, because why wouldn't they.The movies only stopped because Kim refused to do any more and her holding out has been the entire reason the franchise was put on ice for as long as it was so....I think this will go as long as the remaining 3 want it to go on
It doesnt negate the fact that we would've had a 3rd film in 2017 if Kim had been on board.Hmm I think the reception for second movie was the main factor. If it was as successful as the first one (or at least the box office), WB would have wanted to release Sex and the City 3 in 2012 or 2013, because why wouldn't they.
Then when they finally wanted to do the third film (iirc late 2010s?), Kim Cattrall already checked out from the series which was understandable since they left it for so long in the first place. The third film should have been out by 2013. I remember she had an interview with Ellen about the third film, at the time, she said "I hope so" and that she "misses" the girls, and added that the critics shredded the 2nd film. So i don't think she was against the third film in the first place. WB left it for too long and someone just completely lost interest. I don't think she would have said no, if the third film was to be filmed in 2011 or 12.
It happens though. Look at Star Trek. Even Batman is going to be 4 years...3 years less than SatC.See,even I didn't know there was a supposed to be a 2017 film. 7 years after the 2nd film is enough time for someone to completely moved on. And that a 7yeargap between films or projects, is incredibly long in general.