Andrew Garfield wants Spider-Man to be Gay?

Discussion in 'Spidey-World' started by mtd20_2000, Jul 10, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Ultimatehero

    Ultimatehero Life is infinite

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2011
    Messages:
    5,471
    Likes Received:
    0
    Exactly. I seriously think there needs to be a gay or bi superhero film. I'm not saying change a character, but it is very striking that even just joking around about it - you still get this kind of response. As I said, it's one of the main themes in The X-Men. I think there just needs to be a film that shows that being LGBT doesn't make one any more or any less of a man. It doesn't change anything - he'd still be Peter. He wouldn't be flamboyant, he'd still be Peter. It changes absolutely nothing about the character, just who they sleep with. It is a very very minor thing. As a bi guy, that there is a big deal about it is really ridiculous to me because through my eyes one's gender and sexuality is as non-important as hair color or eye color. Hopefully there will be a superhero film with a gay hero someday and if not - seriously going to try to push for there to be one.
     
    #51
  2. Boy Scout

    Boy Scout Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2011
    Messages:
    11,820
    Likes Received:
    19
    You're assuming that those people are fans of the genre as a whole to begin with.
     
    #52
  3. AWT09

    AWT09 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2013
    Messages:
    51
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yes you are right. Like I said in my other comment, just make a new character take on the Spider-Man suit like Ben Riley or just make a new superhero.
    The thing is, the general public will make a big deal about it. They would probably be against the film and wouldn't see it, which isn't fair to homosexual people or characters.
     
    #53
  4. Ultimatehero

    Ultimatehero Life is infinite

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2011
    Messages:
    5,471
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'm pretty sure comic book movie-goers go to see other comic book films. And comic book readers read other comic books. Also no matter what book you read, the struggle for 'mutant' rights isn't exactly just tied to the X-Men. MARVEL and DC have always been progressing towards a more equal and accepting world.
     
    #54
  5. RT59103

    RT59103 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2013
    Messages:
    485
    Likes Received:
    0
    #55
    Last edited: Jul 10, 2013
  6. AWT09

    AWT09 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2013
    Messages:
    51
    Likes Received:
    0
    It's really sad.
     
    #56
  7. fuflipflops

    fuflipflops Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2013
    Messages:
    459
    Likes Received:
    0
    exactly, it wouldn't change anything, since sexuality doesn't define who someone is, and being gay doesn't mean you're suddenly that "sassy gay" that's the stereotype (or that you're butch, if you're a lesbian), AND it'd actually make lgbt people feel like they matter and that they're not freaks - which they aren't by any means, but the world does like to paint that picture. and straight people would still be able to relate, the same way a woman can still relate to spider-man even though he's a guy, or someone can relate to iron man, even though he's rich. it's not that type of thing that defines a person, it's what experiences they go through and the feelings they have.
     
    #57
  8. ReignInBlood

    ReignInBlood Member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2013
    Messages:
    10
    Likes Received:
    0
    How very-what's the word they use now? Progressive?

    Besides this makes much more sense for Batman.....
     
    #58
  9. Thundercrack85

    Thundercrack85 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2009
    Messages:
    21,675
    Likes Received:
    0
    Wasn't that new multi-ethnic Ultimate Spider-man supposed to be gay or bi or something other than straight?
     
    #59
  10. Boy Scout

    Boy Scout Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2011
    Messages:
    11,820
    Likes Received:
    19
    Canon is changed all the time, but more often than not, there are things about the character (whether they be characteristics or people or locations) that have consistently stuck with that character for the majority of their existence. Those things are typically considered sacred (for lack of a better word) and shouldn't be changed without very good reason.

    Is Spider-Man being heterosexual one of those things? Hmm...I suppose. I mean...his love interests have all been women. The love of his life is a woman. The character has been understood to be heterosexual for the majority of his existence. So...why change that? For what reason? To make a statement? Why can't they simply create a new character? Why does an already existing character have to be altered just to prove a point?

    I'm not against change. I think change is good. Sometimes, it's necessary. But, honestly, it depends on the character and the change you're making to that character. It also, I think, depends on what you, as in individual, are comfortable with, and how much you care about the character in question. I mean, despite everything I just said, I wouldn't blink if the next Spider-Man was black. On the other hand, I would be upset if the next Superman wasn't an alien from Krypton.

    I don't know...when it comes to things like this, I don't think there's one right or wrong answer. However, it should be said that intent should play a huge factor in the response these decisions receive.
     
    #60
    Last edited: Jul 10, 2013
  11. Boy Scout

    Boy Scout Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2011
    Messages:
    11,820
    Likes Received:
    19
    Not necessarily. Just because we do doesn't mean everybody else does. Someone could have grown up with Spider-Man and only watches the Spider-Man films out of nostalgia. An interest in one hero doesn't equal interest in all of them.
     
    #61
  12. FN Spider-man

    FN Spider-man Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2012
    Messages:
    4,172
    Likes Received:
    0
    I agree cause with me im only interested in Spidey movies
     
    #62
  13. Quasimod0

    Quasimod0 Bell-Ringer

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2011
    Messages:
    13,425
    Likes Received:
    2
    Yeah..no thanks. lol
     
    #63
  14. Thundercrack85

    Thundercrack85 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2009
    Messages:
    21,675
    Likes Received:
    0
    Having a gay superhero is fine, it's just changing one who has always been straight into a gay character that is going to annoy fans. I mean, fans ***** endlessly about the web shooters, you alter a character's entire identity, and they'll be screaming bloody murder.
     
    #64
  15. jonathancrane

    jonathancrane I love Marvel, DC & EC!

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2011
    Messages:
    7,567
    Likes Received:
    0
    As many posters before me have noted, Garfield's statement was a joke and a serious question about our culture. Coming from the comic standpoint, I am on the middle of the fence, hence I cannot advocate one decision.

    However, Spider-Man does not equal Peter Parker, as we have seen over the years: other characters have taken on the Spider infused costume and done well.

    Besides, it is not impossible for audiences to embrace new, badass characters who lie on the LGBTQA spectrum: Captain Jack Harkness is one example, Jack Sparrow another.
     
    #65
  16. AWT09

    AWT09 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2013
    Messages:
    51
    Likes Received:
    0
    I agree with everything you just said! Except if the next Spidey were black, he would have to be Miles or someone else, not Peter. Because Peter Parker's race is something you can't change just to change it. Like you said, it would have to be for a good reason. Jamie Foxx is black, and Marc Webb picked Foxx because he liked his acting style in Django. For Electro, and only Electro not Peter, it's okay for his race to be changed. For other's like Norman Osborn, it would be like Peter, his race shouldn't be changed. Like you said, some things can be changed and some things just can't depending upon the character and depending upon what you're changing about them.
     
    #66
  17. fuflipflops

    fuflipflops Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2013
    Messages:
    459
    Likes Received:
    0
    creating a new character wouldn't have the same impact. if it were to happen, it'd be important for it to be peter, because of visibility and, yeah, to make a statement. peter being gay wouldn't change anything about him other than making his love interests men. he'd still live with his aunt and uncle, get bit by the spider, lose ben, have the same enemies, make the same jokes, lose gwen, marry mj... and the love interests would be the same too, same personality and stuff. just different gender.

    like i said, lgbt people are 9 times out of 10 the sidekicks, the butt of the joke, or 100% defined by their sexuality, while straight people aren't, and it'd be important to show them they can be the heroes too. just like peter being a hero with real life problems appeals to people and made them feel like they're not alone, if he were shown as gay, lgbt people wouldn't feel alone either. it would only be positive.

    plus, lgbt people have had to learn how to relate to straight characters because there are very few gay ones with actual depth, it wouldn't kill straight people if for once in their lives things weren't catered to them.
     
    #67
  18. Boy Scout

    Boy Scout Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2011
    Messages:
    11,820
    Likes Received:
    19
    Which I understand. Unlike most of you, I have no attachment to Spider-Man. There's honestly not much they can do to him that would bother me. There might be some things I would disagree with on principle, but I wouldn't be outraged simply because it was done to Spider-Man.

    I don't think changing Peter's race would make much of a difference in the long run. It'd be a pretty cosmetic, inconsequential thing, in the context of the internal logic of a hypothetical story that otherwise didn't stray too much from the character's history. But, again, this is coming from someone who isn't really attached to the character. I understand why a huge fan would get upset over something like that.

    I think, as a general rule, supporting characters are more flexible than the main character(s) when it comes to this sort of thing.
     
    #68
    Last edited: Jul 10, 2013
  19. Boy Scout

    Boy Scout Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2011
    Messages:
    11,820
    Likes Received:
    19
    Why should that matter if the purpose is to introduce diversity? And if the film that new character starred in was popular, wouldn't it go on to create an impact?

    That sounds like a pretty huge thing to me. I mean...aren't his romantic relationships with Gwen and MJ (especially MJ) considered essential to the character? Isn't MJ the love of his life? The Lois Lane to his Superman? What would be the purpose of negating such a long history of romance and character development/interaction just to make an impact?

    So you're saying gender doesn't matter? Because it kind of does. I believe in equality, but differences between men and women exist that distinguish us as separate genders.

    I absolutely agree. So create a gay character and give him (or her) a movie.

    Not necessarily. It's possible that some members of the LGBT community would feel like they were being pandered to if an established character's sexuality was changed to make a statement. What kind of message does that send?

    EDIT: Although we disagree, I do like that we are keeping this civil, and I hope to see that continued further into the discussion. :yay:
     
    #69
  20. Bruce Malone

    Bruce Malone Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2009
    Messages:
    8,213
    Likes Received:
    5
    I wouldn't say he was joking, he was more making a personal supportive statement about something that he probably figures is very unlikely to happen though.
     
    #70
  21. Thundercrack85

    Thundercrack85 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2009
    Messages:
    21,675
    Likes Received:
    0
    Or, go all the way, Peter Parker by day, Spider-woman by night.
     
    #71
  22. Ultimatehero

    Ultimatehero Life is infinite

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2011
    Messages:
    5,471
    Likes Received:
    0
    It doesn't. At all. As a bi guy. I can readily say when I have feelings for a guy, they're the same exact feelings I have for a girl. To clarify this is only stating - they're people. It all plays out the same, it all happens the exact same way, the same thing attracts me to them. Hell, for the most part it's the same physical appearance that gets to me. Somebody's gender is as inconsequential as somebody's hair or eye color. And as for someone liking same gender - he'd still be the same guy, nothing at all would change about him or how he acts or anything.
     
    #72
  23. Thundercrack85

    Thundercrack85 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2009
    Messages:
    21,675
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'd say sexuality is a pretty huge part of every individual's identity. Up there with gender and ethnicity. If not higher.
     
    #73
  24. Ultimatehero

    Ultimatehero Life is infinite

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2011
    Messages:
    5,471
    Likes Received:
    0
    Only because the world itself makes a big deal of it. If there was no fear of backlash from the world, there would be no difference. The only difference is wondering if people will accept you, but that's it. I'm in-between the lines. And the only thing that was ever different was that with girls I don't have to be afraid of people ridiculing me for going out with a girl, whereas that possibility is there with going out with a guy. But, other than that - there has been no difference.
     
    #74
  25. Thundercrack85

    Thundercrack85 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2009
    Messages:
    21,675
    Likes Received:
    0
    Even if I agree with you (which I don't), since we all live in this world, then for all intents and purposes, it does.
     
    #75
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"