Bruce to Lucius in the Bat-Bunker:
"Any move I make on Bane or the bomb... the trigger man sets it off"
Then why did they attack Bane's stronghold at City Hall with the police force?
Talia's deception regarding the device's true location slowed him down, certainly.Ya, but Gordon managed to put the trigger blocker on the bomb sometime DURING the battle,
Talia had the trigger, and in her mind Gordon was fumbling around looking for the bomb, which he found just in time.When the police charged with the mercs, it was long before Gordon even managed to locate the real truck with the bomb. Bane woulda just detonated the bomb upon seeing the police charge.
Ya, but Gordon managed to put the trigger blocker on the bomb sometime DURING the battle,
When the police charged with the mercs, it was long before Gordon even managed to locate the real truck with the bomb. Bane woulda just detonated the bomb upon seeing the police charge.
????
The EMP blocker ONLY WORKS if it is mounted on the bomb!!!!!!!!
it wasn't mounted on the bomb until right before Talia pulled the trigger... Batman/The Cops had already started the war!
????
The EMP blocker ONLY WORKS if it is mounted on the bomb!!!!!!!!
it wasn't mounted on the bomb until right before Talia pulled the trigger... Batman/The Cops had already started the war!
TDKR2012,
Yes, what you say is true.
But as I said above, "Time is not on their side, (nor is Miranda)".
The conflict is set in motion...Gordon and Batman are working as fast as they can. They have to "divide and conquer". And things aren't necessarily going their way. It's war.
And this is even more interesting: We see Miranda watching the street battle and the rematch between Bane and Batman.
Why doesn't she hit the trigger??? BECAUSE THIS IS PERSONAL. Batman/Bruce showing up on the battlefield fans the flames of Talia and Bane's desire for revenge. She wants to see Batman taken down by Bane. When that doesn't happen, she waits to get the knife into Batman herself...for personal gratification.
And it is her undoing.
It's REALLY irritating. Yes, Nolan tries to make this as realistic as one can make Batman but this is still a Batman movie at the end of the day. The nitpicking here is really stupid. Just enjoy the damn movie! I just look at the other comic book movies that are out there, as well as the past Batman movies and im thankful we have this trilogy. Because the level of acting, writing, filmmaking is on a whole other level...even with its mistakes.You guys are seriously nitpicking the hell out of this movie!What about Bruce saving Ducard at the begining of BB(holding on one arm and pulling up a 200+ lbs man)?
What about all the crazy Joker plans in TDK that came out of nowhere(like the hospital scene) or Batman falling with Rachel with half his cape spread?I can go on and on pointing flaws of the previous movies, yet only this movie gets hate...It just baffles me!?
She (Talia) is also aware of the fact that Gordon has an EMP device that he plans to plant it near the nuke to render the trigger useless but she still does not hit the trigger as she is hoping that Bane will Once again defeat Batman.
Bruce_Begins,
Don't mean to nitpick your post, (forgive me):
I think Talia is smart so she fakes Gordon out with the first empty truck. But I do not think Talia is aware of Gordon's portable EMP device.
Excerpt from script:
Talia arms the trigger...
She hits the button - nothing.
A Mercenary steps forward -
MERCENARY
The truck’s under attack -
Talia looks around, mind racing.
TALIA
Gordon. (To Batman.) You gave him a
way to block my signal. No matter -
(Looks at watch.) He’s bought
Gotham eleven minutes. (Shouts at
Mercenary.) Prepare a convoy. We
must secure the bomb until it
detonates.
You guys are seriously nitpicking the hell out of this movie!What about Bruce saving Ducard at the begining of BB(holding on one arm and pulling up a 200+ lbs man)?
What about all the crazy Joker plans in TDK that came out of nowhere(like the hospital scene) or Batman falling with Rachel with half his cape spread?I can go on and on pointing flaws of the previous movies, yet only this movie gets hate...It just baffles me!?
Saying "How did Bruce just get back in to an entriely occupied city?" is a perfectly valid thing to say IMO.
Yeah I watched BB, quite a few times actually but it only showed that Bruce was great a travelling the world. Okay thats good and tells us how Bruce got back to Gotham but not how he got in.No, it's not, didn't you watch BB?How did Bruce dissappear for so long and nobody was able to recognize him?
Maybe not see it but a little mention would have been okay. The plot revolved around how Gotham is under occupation being obviously monitored at every entrance and exit.Did you really need to see a scene of Bruce arriving with a plane in TDKR or whatever other way Nolan would have thought of for Bruce to get back to Gotham.
This excuse needs to stop for everything. Honestly it is fine for a few things but saying "He's Batman" for every point made becomes funny. He maybe Batman but he had nothing to get back in to the city, no suit and no gadgets. If anything its quite intriguing to know.He's the mother****ing Batman, that's how he came back!
And here comes the typical over exaggeration. Somehow a fairly valid complaint of how a hero with no gadgets or help got into a city occupied by an entire army is met with "do you need to see every waking minute of every second of every minute of every hour of this guys life?" no I don't but I'd say it would be nice to this information that does effect the plot. A simply saying "he's Batman" really doesn't cut it.I mean, do you need to see everything that happens with these characters?I haven't seen Batman take a piss or a **** for that matter. "Damn you Nolan for not showing me this important scene of Batman taking a piss, when all of Gotham is about to be demolished!!!!11ONE"
Yeah I watched BB, quite a few times actually but it only showed that Bruce was great a travelling the world. Okay thats good and tells us how Bruce got back to Gotham but not how he got in.
Maybe not see it but a little mention would have been okay. The plot revolved around how Gotham is under occupation being obviously monitored at every entrance and exit.
This excuse needs to stop for everything. Honestly it is fine for a few things but saying "He's Batman" for every point made becomes funny. He maybe Batman but he had nothing to get back in to the city, no suit and no gadgets. If anything its quite intriguing to know.
And here comes the typical over exaggeration. Somehow a fairly valid complaint of how a hero with no gadgets or help got into a city occupied by an entire army is met with "do you need to see every waking minute of every second of every minute of every hour of this guys life?" no I don't but I'd say it would be nice to this information that does effect the plot. A simply saying "he's Batman" really doesn't cut it.
I am NOT saying such a nitpick ruins the film I am NOT saying this moment is a plot hole. I am simply saying it is a valid point to make on its own. The nitpick doesn't personally annoy me as he likely took out a few guards or maybe just sneaked past but I can see why it might annoy others. As long as it isn't followed by people saying "Nolan ruined the film by doing this" that particular point is valid and not severe nitpicking. Saying "JGL is to skinny to become Batman" IS a stupid nitpick to make.
I'm not dissagreeing with you, but I really wanted to see a scene in BB of Bruce getting stopped at the airport and asked who he was because "Bruce Wayne is declared dead".He has no documents, batsuit or gadgets, so how did he get to back Gotham?He must have made himself new documents, Nolan really needed to show that!