I'm glad Chickenscratch got banned. He was very knowledgeable about books, but man, the guy was such a pretentious *****e who though film and movies was such a lowly medium and looked down on anyone who enjoyed their film or tv translations over their source material. He also got pissed if even the movies even had the slightest amount wrong.
He kept saying the new Bond movies got it wrong off the bat because Bond in the books was a 00 agent way before Casino Royale.
Oh,
that guy. The strangest thing about him, to me, was the way that he worshiped all of the Bond novels equally. I can understand being a Fleming-purist, but he clearly thought all of the ****** spin-offs were an equally valid exemplar of the character.
I've never put anybody on ignore. I've been here long enough to just deal with peoples ****.
Some people are just so boring, though. I never ignore people for being abrasive, but there are times when you only need to see a member's username in a thread to know what they have written. That's when the ignore button is useful.
You're joking, yes?
It's literally ALL I read about in regards to Cavill, aside from how ****ing handsome he is, leading up to the release of MOS.
That, and how "buff" or "swole" an actor is/should be for a part. Pages upon pages of casting threads are devoted to vast galleries of tanned, muscular, shirtless young men. Their merits as actors is clearly of secondary concern.
Sometimes, when my girlfriend looks over my shoulder, I can sense her bewilderment.
He probably is, but I doubt he's a hip representation of his generation. Bond novels are dated even for my 65 year old dad. A lot of racist and misogynistic undertones can be found in some of them. Not saying anything about Fleming, but his books are very much a product of their time.
You're right in a sense, but then Bond wasn't really meant to be an unblemished hero. He is an assassin who kind of likes his job, and a womaniser without much of a heart. But he's on our side, so that's all okay.
Nevertheless, I think it can be a mistake to think literature is "dated" just because the views expressed therein are out of date. It just takes on a new interest as period fiction. I mean, the religious angst in
Pilgrim's Progress is of only historical interest nowadays, but it's an important socio-historical artifact.