Arizona grade school can't have have minorities on the wall

bored

One Sexy Lemur
Joined
Sep 18, 2003
Messages
13,282
Reaction score
5
Points
58
http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/2010/06/04/20100604arizona-mural-sparks-racial-debate.html

Altered mural fuels racial debate in Prescott

154 comments by Dennis Wagner - Jun. 4, 2010 12:00 AM
The Arizona Republic

A group of artists has been asked to lighten the faces of children depicted in a giant public mural at a Prescott school.

The project's leader says he was ordered to lighten the skin tone after complaints about the children's ethnicity. But the school's principal says the request was only to fix shading and had nothing to do with political pressure.

The "Go on Green" mural, which covers two walls outside Miller Valley Elementary School, was designed to advertise a campaign for environmentally friendly transportation. It features portraits of four children, with a Hispanic boy as the dominant figure.

R.E. Wall, director of Prescott's Downtown Mural Project, said he and other artists were subjected to slurs from motorists as they worked on the painting at one of the town's most prominent intersections.

"We consistently, for two months, had people shouting racial slander from their cars," Wall said. "We had children painting with us, and here come these yells of (epithet for Blacks) and (epithet for Hispanics)."

Wall said school Principal Jeff Lane pressed him to make the children's faces appear happier and brighter.

"It is being lightened because of the controversy," Wall said, adding that "they want it to look like the children are coming into light."

Lane said that he received only three complaints about the mural and that his request for a touch-up had nothing to do with political pressure. "We asked them to fix the shading on the children's faces," he said. "We were looking at it from an artistic view. Nothing at all to do with race."

City Councilman Steve Blair spearheaded a public campaign on his talk show at Prescott radio station KYCA-AM (1490) to remove the mural.

In a broadcast last month, according to the Daily Courier in Prescott, Blair mistakenly complained that the most prominent child in the painting is African-American, saying: "To depict the biggest picture on the building as a Black person, I would have to ask the question: Why?"

Blair could not be reached for comment Thursday. In audio archives of his radio show, Blair discusses the mural. He insists the controversy isn't about racism but says the mural is intended to create racial controversy where none existed before.

"Personally, I think it's pathetic," he says. "You have changed the ambience of that building to excite some kind of diversity power struggle that doesn't exist in Prescott, Arizona. And I'm ashamed of that."

Faces in the mural were drawn from photographs of children enrolled at Miller Valley, a K-5 school with 380 students and the highest ethnic mix of any school in Prescott. Wall said thousands of town residents volunteered or donated to the project, the fourth in a series of community murals painted by a group of artists known as the "Mural Mice."

The public art, funded by a $5,000 state grant through the Prescott Alternative Transportation Center, was selected by school students and faculty.

"The parents and children love it," Lane said.

Read more: http://www.azcentral.com/news/artic...mural-sparks-racial-debate.html#ixzz0pvlyGZC6


I'll hold off on generalizations. Who has thoughts?
 
It's ridiculous that in 2010 this kind of racial ignorance still exists!
 
This is the most ******ed thing I've heard all day.
 
I think the question of "Why?" regarding the biggest picture being a black person is a valid one, I mean, why aren't all the races depicted to be the same size due to their inherent equality? Oh right, it's ****ing painting.

:awesome:
 
This sounds like a reverse "Do the Right Thing."
 
Didn't Arizona object to the creation of MLK holiday?
 
Arizona is catchin' quite the heat lately. I'm trying to find the bill that the state passed, but I can't find it.
 
According to the City Councilman, a minority should not be prominent because depicting a kid who happens to be black as slightly larger on a childrens mural implies racial issues in his town, whereas he believes asking a mural to be removed because there's a noticeable black kid on it doesn't imply racism.

According to the director of the project, they're only changing the mural because passersby were shouting racial slurs at the artists and children who were helping. Thing is, backing down because of racists never solved anything.

According to the principal, it's just a shading issue and the kids are being recolored to make it seem like the kids are stepping into the light. He's like the one person who refuses to publicly acknowledge that this is a race issue.

Meanwhile, the children who attend this school and their parents love the mural. But who gives a **** what they think, right?
 
Didn't Arizona object to the creation of MLK holiday?

Yes, back in 1990, which had a major impact on their economy, because the Super Bowl (which had been awarded to Phoenix the year before and was to be played in 1993, Super Bowl 28) was moved to Los Angeles when the MLK holiday wasn't recognized by Arizona.

They lost $350 million dollars as a result of that blunder. In 1992, they finally voted in favor of the King Holiday and ended up getting Super Bowl 30.
 
There's gonna be moustaches and penisia drawn all over the mural within a year anyway.
 
I wonder if Arizona is just doing this so their minority population will just up and leave out of frustration ?
 
Arizona is catchin' quite the heat lately. I'm trying to find the bill that the state passed, but I can't find it.


The one about authorities being allowed to ask for proof of citizenship at their leisure? That's the most recent and ridiculous one that comes to mind regarding Arizona.
 
I'll be honest, I was born here, and therefore am a citizen by default, but aside from attempting to read in spanish using zero accent at all, I don't know how I can prove my citizenship at the drop of a hat.
 
"You have changed the ambience of that building to excite some kind of diversity power struggle that doesn't exist in Prescott, Arizona. And I'm ashamed of that."

What the hell is this idiot blabbering about?

Pleasantville, anyone?
 
The one about authorities being allowed to ask for proof of citizenship at their leisure? That's the most recent and ridiculous one that comes to mind regarding Arizona.



It's not at their leisure. Read up on it before you spew venom.

Admittedly, the geenral fear is that is what will happen.
 
Last edited:
what angers me is these are epithets from grown people about children, CHILDREN!!!!! What kind of evil %^^ing %^&^le would get angered over seeing a painting of children???! Man I hope I get reincarnated as a tornado. :cmad:
 
It's not at their leisure. Read up on it before you spew venom.

Uhh how exactly am I spewing venom? I was unsure about it in the first place and asked if that's what the poster I quoted was referring to. Maybe you should relax a bit.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"