Thread Manager
Moderator
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2011
- Messages
- 0
- Reaction score
- 3
- Points
- 1
This is a continuation thread, the old thread is [split]383251[/split]
Same.I'm in no rush as long as were getting quality solos and sequels.
I know you're exaggerating on purpose but really there's no reason why it can't be as good as the 1st if it comes out in 3 years. You just get 5 times as much awesome with that system and you don't die before Avengers V. t: Also I think most people would want the same cast for a few films and that becomes less likely the longer you wait. Some of them are already getting on a bit! Unless you want a reboot?!I don't care if its 15 or 16 I just want it to be as good as the 1st
Do you guys think that Marvel should wait another 4 years before we see another Avengers film? Or should they cut it down by one year and have it released in 2015?
Since they're planning to have the sequels for Thor, IM, and Cap for 2013-2014, I think it is logical to assume that they're scheduling TA2 for 2015. Given how huge TA has been, I doubt Marvel and Disney wanted the sequel to take too long to come out, like Star Trek 2 has done. I think a 4 year wait might not be good because you don't want the movie to start fading from public's consciousness, but 3 years is appropriate.
Well a recent interview from quesada said they we're looking to do more tent pole character films. So I assume that means intro-ing new ones too. Marvel won't survive with just doing sequels. And 2013 is already booked, and 2014 has cap, one mystery film, and possibly antman
Which is why Marvel should have just gone ahead and used Giant man and Wasp. I think if you CAN'T get your act togehter on a property then give it backId disagree, some characters might need the hype off of the current avengers wave. incase it dies out
Still no difference when marvel promises not to use the characters until after the movie is out.
Man, I'm wondering what I'm going to do for Avengers news/fix. I think it will be quite a while before there's anything substantial to see regarding where Avengers goes from here. I expect I won't be posting in this part of the forum as regularly as I used to either (I'll probably be divided between the various Avenger members movie forum sections).
Exactly. Tho if they were at least metntioned by NAME in Thor it wouldn't really have been throwing them into Avengers.I *think* what he means is that *Edgar Wright* should have relinquished his involvement, if he wasn't going to do a movie *right now*.
Which, since I think just throwing Pym and Jan into the Avengers would have been an *awful* move. . .