Avengers Assembled: News and Speculation - - Part 68

Discussion in 'Marvel's The Avengers' started by Thread Manager, May 21, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Thread Manager Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    0
    Likes Received:
    2
    This is a continuation thread, the old thread is [split]383251[/split]
     
  2. Thread Manager Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    0
    Likes Received:
    2
    This is a continuation thread, the old thread is [split]382527[/split]
     
  3. BobbyCorwin88 Avatars are hard

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2011
    Messages:
    1,295
    Likes Received:
    0
    Didn't mean to post my review here. Sorry. But... well there it is. It's been moved to the rate/review thread. Sorry for any spoilers in here. Feel free to delete it mods.
     
  4. spideyboy_1111 Young Avenger

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2001
    Messages:
    66,463
    Likes Received:
    6
  5. herolee10 No More Miracles

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2007
    Messages:
    26,816
    Likes Received:
    1,408
    Do you guys think that Marvel should wait another 4 years before we see another Avengers film? Or should they cut it down by one year and have it released in 2015?
     
  6. spideyboy_1111 Young Avenger

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2001
    Messages:
    66,463
    Likes Received:
    6
    It will probably be 2015. But id rather 16 so we have more time to introduce more characters in the mcu
     
  7. marcvader Lurker #1

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2006
    Messages:
    13,124
    Likes Received:
    8
    I'm in no rush as long as were getting quality solos and sequels.
     
  8. JeetKuneDo Guitarist

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2006
    Messages:
    2,408
    Likes Received:
    15
    Same.

    Unless I find out I have 6 months to live...then I'll get a bit impatient.
     
  9. Iceman Daffy Duck Vs The Joker

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2005
    Messages:
    145,569
    Likes Received:
    24,478
    If we wait 4 years between each Avengers film then these guys we have at the moment can only make so many. 3 would be preferable to me.
     
  10. DJ_KiDDvIcIOUs Registered

    Joined:
    May 7, 2012
    Messages:
    25,042
    Likes Received:
    3
    I don't care if its 15 or 16 I just want it to be as good as the 1st
     
  11. Iceman Daffy Duck Vs The Joker

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2005
    Messages:
    145,569
    Likes Received:
    24,478
    I know you're exaggerating on purpose but really there's no reason why it can't be as good as the 1st if it comes out in 3 years. You just get 5 times as much awesome with that system and you don't die before Avengers V. :woot: Also I think most people would want the same cast for a few films and that becomes less likely the longer you wait. Some of them are already getting on a bit! Unless you want a reboot?! :wow::csad:
     
  12. The Infernal Mky Mk

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2005
    Messages:
    10,202
    Likes Received:
    352
    Man, I'm wondering what I'm going to do for Avengers news/fix. I think it will be quite a while before there's anything substantial to see regarding where Avengers goes from here. I expect I won't be posting in this part of the forum as regularly as I used to either (I'll probably be divided between the various Avenger members movie forum sections).
     
  13. Raiden Wakanda Forever

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2002
    Messages:
    30,005
    Likes Received:
    497
    Since they're planning to have the sequels for Thor, IM, and Cap for 2013-2014, I think it is logical to assume that they're scheduling TA2 for 2015. Given how huge TA has been, I doubt Marvel and Disney wanted the sequel to take too long to come out, like Star Trek 2 has done. I think a 4 year wait might not be good because you don't want the movie to start fading from public's consciousness, but 3 years is appropriate.
     
  14. spideyboy_1111 Young Avenger

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2001
    Messages:
    66,463
    Likes Received:
    6

    Well a recent interview from quesada said they we're looking to do more tent pole character films. So I assume that means intro-ing new ones too. Marvel won't survive with just doing sequels. And 2013 is already booked, and 2014 has cap, one mystery film, and possibly antman
     
    #14 spideyboy_1111, May 22, 2012
    Last edited: May 22, 2012
  15. Raiden Wakanda Forever

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2002
    Messages:
    30,005
    Likes Received:
    497
    Of course not, but right now it is much better for Marvel to make sequels for established characters like IM, Thor, and Cap then making new solo movies. Although I'd love to see BP, Ms. Marvel, and other new Avengers on the big screen, I think it would be better if they postpone them after TA2, so they can show up in TA3 and perhaps served as the successors of those Avengers if they want to make more sequels.
     
  16. spideyboy_1111 Young Avenger

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2001
    Messages:
    66,463
    Likes Received:
    6
    Id disagree, some characters might need the hype off of the current avengers wave. incase it dies out
     
  17. Vartha Mod of Thunder

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2004
    Messages:
    40,485
    Likes Received:
    1
    Which is why Marvel should have just gone ahead and used Giant man and Wasp. I think if you CAN'T get your act togehter on a property then give it back
     
  18. Quasimod0 Bell-Ringer

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2011
    Messages:
    13,423
    Likes Received:
    11
    Give it back to whom? Marvel owns it. Lol
     
  19. spideyboy_1111 Young Avenger

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2001
    Messages:
    66,463
    Likes Received:
    6
    ... Yeah, no one else has owned antman and wasp to my knowledge... And they can't give it back to themselves
     
  20. spideyboy_1111 Young Avenger

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2001
    Messages:
    66,463
    Likes Received:
    6
    Also.... Fiege has said antman is likely coming in 2014
     
  21. Vartha Mod of Thunder

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2004
    Messages:
    40,485
    Likes Received:
    1
    Still no difference when marvel promises not to use the characters until after the movie is out.
     
  22. spideyboy_1111 Young Avenger

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2001
    Messages:
    66,463
    Likes Received:
    6
    what???
     
  23. The Ironstar Registered

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2012
    Messages:
    1,303
    Likes Received:
    1

    OH! NO!?? :awesome::

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/conve...ls/2012/05/22/gIQAA1vbiU_gallery.html#photo=1

    :cwink:
     
  24. metaphysician Not a Side-Kick

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2012
    Messages:
    12,234
    Likes Received:
    715
    I *think* what he means is that *Edgar Wright* should have relinquished his involvement, if he wasn't going to do a movie *right now*.

    Which, since I think just throwing Pym and Jan into the Avengers would have been an *awful* move. . .
     
  25. Vartha Mod of Thunder

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2004
    Messages:
    40,485
    Likes Received:
    1
    Exactly. Tho if they were at least metntioned by NAME in Thor it wouldn't really have been throwing them into Avengers.
    I thought the use of Pym and Vandyne in the EMH episodes were damned good compared to the Ultimates
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"