Avril Sued Again?!

Nope. As a writer myself I believe that. It's not easy to go after something in Hollywood. And until you even remotely set your foot in the door no one deserves to criticize.

Uh, I'm in the same boat as you (aspiring writer), but this kind of thing is okay to critize because it is plagerism. Even when it's music beats, some guy wrote those and put them down on paper. That person's own creativity was stolen and used for some talentless hack like Lavine.

How does that NOT piss you off?

how is the rubinoo's claim BS?

the song may be different, but with the exception of substituting girl for boy, the chorus is EXACTLY the same!

i don't think avril should be held responsible, though. it's not like she writes her own music or anything.

I would so laugh if that is her defense for this.

Still I would blame her--because it's her name on it, she should be responsible enough to do her own original work and not steal from other people.

Making your s**ty emo music is one thing, but making it while stealing other people's work? F**k that, she deserves whatever she gets coming to her.

That is SOOO flawed, only a journalist can come up with a sucky theory like that...

While I agree about it being pretty faulty, but...what does journalism have to do with this? :huh:
 
Avril is part of the reason that mainstream music sucks, but she’s damn hot.

5cb8b406-eb99-4097-aa09-154f5e800a4c.widec.jpg
 
Ah ok.

No they're not. :huh:

:whatever: And what music have you come out with that's better than hers?


You don't need to be a muscian to say she sucks.


Otherwise, every single f*****g person on this board needs to shut up about how Bush does such a horrible job about being president.

I don't see any of you being president and doing a better job.


Lame. :o
 
John Lennon's estate should sue Avril for the hack job she did on "Imagine" for that Darfur album.

And for the record, Avril's music sucks hard. But she is hot.
 
Avril is part of the reason that mainstream music sucks, but she’s damn hot.

5cb8b406-eb99-4097-aa09-154f5e800a4c.widec.jpg

Her annoying attitude and s**ty music severely deminishes her hotness. If I did hit it, I would have to do it from behind with a gag in her mouth and a brown paper bag over her head. :o
 
She is not talented nor is she hot. Why does she still receive money and credibilty?
 
John Lennon's estate should sue Avril for the hack job she did on "Imagine" for that Darfur album.

And for the record, Avril's music sucks hard. But she is hot.

In-motherf**king-deed. I'm sure even Lennon would temporarily slip from his vow of non-violence and b***h-slap her to the stone age.

But he can't, so all we can do is just "imagine" ways of Lavigne paying in the most gruesome ways. :csad:
 
Her annoying attitude and s**ty music severely deminishes her hotness. If I did hit it, I would have to do it from behind with a gag in her mouth and a brown paper bag over her head. :o

I'll go with the gag, but you'd put a paper bag over this? :huh:

Avril%20Lavigne%20275.jpg
 
Uh, I'm in the same boat as you (aspiring writer), but this kind of thing is okay to critize because it is plagerism. Even when it's music beats, some guy wrote those and put them down on paper. That person's own creativity was stolen and used for some talentless hack like Lavine.

How does that NOT piss you off?



I would so laugh if that is her defense for this.

Still I would blame her--because it's her name on it, she should be responsible enough to do her own original work and not steal from other people.

Making your s**ty emo music is one thing, but making it while stealing other people's work? F**k that, she deserves whatever she gets coming to her.




While I agree about it being pretty faulty, but...what does journalism have to do with this? :huh:

why should she be held responsible to write her own music when half (if not more) of the music industry doesn't?

and just because she makes (according to you) crappy music, does that really mean she deserves to be punished for it?

odds are she had no idea that her song was ripped off. i wouldn't doubt it for a second.
 
why should she be held responsible to write her own music when half (if not more) of the music industry doesn't?

and just because she makes (according to you) crappy music, does that really mean she deserves to be punished for it?

odds are she had no idea that her song was ripped off. i wouldn't doubt it for a second.

Okay, maybe I said it too harshly, what I mean is:

In the end, no matter how many producers and such is under her, in the public eye, it's HER music. No one knows about the "men behind the curtain," if you will. Since the plagerised work is under her name, she should have more sense to make sure that her work is original.

You see what I'm saying?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,415
Messages
22,100,323
Members
45,896
Latest member
Bob999
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"