Batman: Arkham Knight - Part 4

[zenith16]

Rocksteady should move on to Superman. We got that Lex Corp easter egg in the Arkham Knight trailer. Please Rocksteady, do Superman.

when they told game informer & others they'd move on they said move on from WB all together they want to do their own ip & work for other publishers they were just coy on what though .

They were asked many times off screen video about super man. They said they aren't interested in him. but I wish they did a video saying they weren't interested in super man at all from Shefton Hill cause some how the message of it in written form, Just isn't sinking in.

 

[LEVITIKUZ]

when they told ame ifomer they 'd move o they said move o from WB all toether they wantto do their own ip they were just coy o what. they were asked many times off scree about super ma but I wish they did a video sayi they weren't interested in super man cause some how the message of it in written form, Just isn't sinking in.

I am not being mean at all but do you have an English problem because your grammar is all over the place.

Also if what I'm understanding that you're saying, they can't move from WB. WB brought Rocksteady and I doubt they would ever want to let Rocksteady go after creating GOTY games.

Besides money talks. WB will probably do anything to convince Rocksteady to at least consider a Superman game. There's too much potential. A Superman game could be like God of War meets superheroes with how powerful Superman's rogues are.

 

[zenith16]

I am not being mean at all but do you have an English problem because your grammar is all over the place.

Also if what I'm understanding that you're saying, they can't move from WB. WB brought Rocksteady and I doubt they would ever want to let Rocksteady go after creating GOTY games.

Besides money talks. WB will probably do anything to convince Rocksteady to at least consider a Superman game. There's too much potential. A Superman game could be like God of War meets superheroes with how powerful Superman's rogues are.

it's a key board & bad web connection issue of late

so far rock steady has said no though. these are the same people that say when they need time to push back a game they are respected & it happens . which alot of other studio's wish or should be able to get to make a better game. if they want to move on completely they should be allowed to they earned that right.

But it's their chose in the end .

 

[LEVITIKUZ]

it's a key board web issue of late

Ah. I see.

 

[zenith16]

yeah it's a pain the correction don't always come out fast enough , as you can see the post you quoted where you asked me that is well better to understand.

 

[Pfeiffer-Pfan]

when they told game informer & others they'd move on they said move on from WB all together

Considering Warner Bros. has a majority stake in Rocksteady, that would be quite tricky to achieve.

There's no reason they wouldn't develop their own IP under the current deal with WB.

 

[zenith16]

Considering Warner Bros. has a majority stake in Rocksteady, that would be quite tricky to achieve.

There's no reason they wouldn't develop their own IP under the current deal with WB.

We'll find out after this game come out and when they are ready to share & not be coy about it. if they do another game for wb cool . if the do one for another publisher still cool that's the way I look at it.


But if they want to do what platnium games or Insomniac Games & other before them have done and they had people have some stake in how they started as well & they still left to be working for other people / publishers as a studio. We'll have to respect that. That's all I'm saying.

 

[GamerSlyRatchet]

The solicitations of issues two and three of the comic are out now, as well as a cool cover.

Nothing too major is revealed, but the mention of [BLACKOUT]the murder of villains makes me wonder if any of the villains we've seen in the games will bite it before AK[/BLACKOUT].

 

[LEVITIKUZ]

Here is the badass cover to issue 2 for folks.

 

[DarthSkywalker]

We'll find out after this game come out and when they are ready to share & not be coy about it. if they do another game for wb cool . if the do one for another publisher still cool that's the way I look at it.


But if they want to do what platnium games or Insomniac Games & other before them have done and they had people have some stake in how they started as well & they still left to be working for other people / publishers as a studio. We'll have to respect that. That's all I'm saying.

Everything I see on the internet says they are owned by WB. They are what Pixar, Lucasfilms and Marvel Studios are to Disney. Meaning, they can't work or another publisher.

 

[LEVITIKUZ]

Rocksteady made THE 2 best superhero video games of all time. Origins was good but still a lot of the stuff Rocksteady did.

For WB to own Rocksteady and not say "hey can you guys do another DC game like your Batman series? We will give you as much time and resources as you need" I just don't see Rocksteady not doing another DC game UNLESS they make some sort of agreement with WB saying they would do an IP and then a DC game.

Either way no way Rocksteady is done with DC games after Arkham Knight.

 

[DarthSkywalker]

Rocksteady made THE 2 best superhero video games of all time. Origins was good but still a lot of the stuff Rocksteady did.

For WB to own Rocksteady and not say "hey can you guys do another DC game like your Batman series? We will give you as much time and resources as you need" I just don't see Rocksteady not doing another DC game UNLESS they make some sort of agreement with WB saying they would do an IP and then a DC game.

Either way no way Rocksteady is done with DC games after Arkham Knight.

They didn't make Infamous Second Son.

The question will probably come down to how much they value their talent. Put Rocksteady on a project they don't want to do leads to two things. A subpar game and your quality creative leaving to do their own thing.

 

[The Joker]

Here is the badass cover to issue 2 for folks.

That's awesome

When is this comic book out again?

 

[LEVITIKUZ]

That's awesome

When is this comic book out again?

Issue 1: Feburary 25th
Issue 2: April 8th
Issue 3: April 22nd

 

[Guts]

After Arkham Knight, I wouldn't mind an open world Batman Beyond game.

 

[terry78]

I would want a Bat-Family game. Batgirl/Red Hood/the Robins, etc.

 

[spiderman2]

Cant weight for this game it and Zelda wii u are my 2 most anticipated games of 2015 has this has became my favorite new franchise and Zelda my all time favorite franchise and the game comes out 1 day before my birthday its going to be a great birthday lol. So with the game being about 4.5 months away and with the game coming out before E3 when dose ever one think we will get more previews or trailers and such? Has with 4.5 months we know we will get more news.

 

[godisawesome]

I would want a Bat-Family game. Batgirl/Red Hood/the Robins, etc.

Red Hood's confirmed for a story DLC, Tim's got a new action figure design with sleeves attached to Arkham Knight's publicity, and Dick's got two consecutive appearances in the series. It seems like we will have the boys back in town in this outing, in one form or another.

In contrast, Babs still seems to be on her lonesome as Oracle. They could unveil Batgirl's before the game comes out, but there's no precedent for Cass or Steph to make an appearance as of yet. Which is a shame; can you imagine how they'd design the Batgirls to have unique game-play styles like the Robins? I could easily see them making Cass a melee specialized character, have Babs hack machinery in the area, and making Steph more gadget reliant.

Of course, my ideal scenario would involve access to free roam with multiple members of the family (plus Catwoman) and maybe some generic side quests they could share. I really liked the Crime Solving side-quest from Origins; imagine how much fun it would be to play with Nightwing/Tim/Steph if they could talk to Babs/Bruce/Catwoman while doing so!

 

[AnneFan]

After Arkham Knight, I wouldn't mind an open world Batman Beyond game.

I'm not sure what I'd like after AK. I do know I'd like the same level of attention and care the Arkhamverse received, though.

 

[SymbioticToxin]

Much as I like the Arkham games, I want them to get away from Batman. Focus on another DC character who would be fun to play as in a video game. Superman, I suppose. Flash, I think, would be interesting. Or they could attempt a Marvel: Ultimate Alliance or X-men Legends type of game with Teen Titans or something.

 

[AnneFan]

I'm definitely up for other characters getting treatment. Though I see Batman remaining in video games in some fashion. Batman sells - he's just too much of a big property for WB to ignore.

 

[godisawesome]

Warner Interactive is almost certainly going to continue the Arkham brand; people may not love Arkham Origins, but it's still generally appreciated and very commercially successful.

 

[GREEN =w= DAY]

although Rocksteady will be done with Arkham/Batman games after Arkham Knight, i hope WB Montreal continue making games. not necessarily more Batman games, but other DC characters like Flash, Green Lantern, etc. or even Justice League

 

[BrollySupersj]

Much as I like the Arkham games, I want them to get away from Batman. Focus on another DC character who would be fun to play as in a video game. Superman, I suppose. Flash, I think, would be interesting. Or they could attempt a Marvel: Ultimate Alliance or X-men Legends type of game with Teen Titans or something.

There was once a Flash game being made in the past. I remember it looking pretty good. I think Rocksteady could make a fun Flash game.

 

[spiderman2]

Here is the badass cover to issue 2 for folks.

oh wow that is a interesting cover!