Batman vs. The Creeper(Jeepers Creepers)

[Ultra Lantern]

If Batman was attacked by The Creeper(Jeepers Creepers)would he survive?

No prep time.


Yes

No

 

[Duke]

I think Batman wins because he relies on skills, strategy, & not just on brute force like the Creeper does. Batman also has sophisticated weaponry & all he has to do is outlast him for 1 night. So, The Dark Knight FTW!!!

 

[Majik1387]

Do we really need all these random Batman threads? They're starting to get annoying.

And no, Batman wouldn't survive inside the 23 days of the Creeper's hunting.

 

[Ultra Lantern]

I think Batman wins because he relies on skills, strategy, & not just on brute force like the Creeper does. Batman also has sophisticated weaponry & all he has to do is outlast him for 1 night. So, The Dark Knight FTW!!!

Batman has a utility belt with weopons.

The Creeper can regenerate new body parts and has sharp knives.

In order for Batman to win,the cycle of The Creeper must be near an end.


My pick is Batman.

 

[IndyJokerJones]

I have a question for you, what's with all these Batman VS. threads?

And The Creeper preys on fear just like Batman does. It wouldn't target him so it wouldn't be giving Batman all it's attention.

 

[Ultra Lantern]

I have a question for you, what's with all these Batman VS. threads?

And The Creeper preys on fear just like Batman does. It wouldn't target him so it wouldn't be giving Batman all it's attention.

I could do a Green Lantern vs. somebody thread.

I have a thread in almost every forum.


Batman has no prep time for this battle.

 

[IndyJokerJones]

I could do a Green Lantern vs. somebody thread.

I have a thread in almost every forum.

That...doesn't really answer my question. Wouldn't one mega "Batman vs." thread suffice? You don't need poles to appreciate the conversation plus it would limit the flooding that comes from having a dozen different threads to discuss what is basically exactly the same thing, "would Batman kick ass or not?"

 

[Ultra Lantern]

That...doesn't really answer my question. Wouldn't one mega "Batman vs." thread suffice? You don't need poles to appreciate the conversation plus it would limit the flooding that comes from having a dozen different threads to discuss what is basically exactly the same thing, "would Batman kick ass or not?"

I think individual threads are better,because each battle is different and the conversations would get confusing.

 

[Majik1387]

Not really. I think all of the threads should be merged honestly.

 

[OmarBatGeek]

I don't think the threads should be merged. Some of the individual threads themselves have a ton of replies. All that conversation mixed into one massive thread would be a waste of time for everyone and would get extremely confusing. I think they're okay by themselves. But I do agree that it's a little strange that everyone's so fascinated by imagining pitting Bats against everyone else they can think of. XD

I think he'd be okay. He obviously wouldn't be able to kill the creeper, but he'd be able to survive at least. Unless he decided to get heroic and really stop him from killing other people. Then he might die. I'm not sure on this one, I'll have to think a while before I vote in the poll...

 

[IndyJokerJones]

the conversations would get confusing.

would get extremely confusing.

That's what quoting is for, to direct your replies and steer the conversation.

because each battle is different

That doesn't make an argument as to why one big thread doesn't work better or worse than many of tiny threads.

All that conversation mixed into one massive thread would be a waste of time for everyone

Like making 15 different threads isn't a waste of time AND space for everyone?

 

[Ultra Lantern]

I don't think the threads should be merged. Some of the individual threads themselves have a ton of replies. All that conversation mixed into one massive thread would be a waste of time for everyone and would get extremely confusing. I think they're okay by themselves. But I do agree that it's a little strange that everyone's so fascinated by imagining pitting Bats against everyone else they can think of. XD

I think he'd be okay. He obviously wouldn't be able to kill the creeper, but he'd be able to survive at least. Unless he decided to get heroic and really stop him from killing other people. Then he might die. I'm not sure on this one, I'll have to think a while before I vote in the poll...

Thank you very much.

 

[spider13]

Batman wins only becasue the crepper wouldn't come after him.

If the crepper did batman would die.

 

[OmarBatGeek]

That's what quoting is for, to direct your replies and steer the conversation.

You're right, that was my bad. I'll make sure to use quoting more often so you can understand and connect my statements with everyone else's.

That doesn't make an argument as to why one big thread doesn't work better or worse than many of tiny threads.

It does, actually. You know, if you were paying attention. Maybe she should have quoted something? Would that have helped? I mean, I'm just saying. Not to be rude or anything. Perhaps this conversation should be put into a different thread. After all, it is completely off topic. And that's what new threads are for, right? So different topics can be discussed without the confusion of other topics being talked about at the same time? That's what I was led to believe, anyways. But maybe you're right, I've only been a member here for a few days. You probably know the ropes here better than I do.

Thank you very much.

You are very welcome.

Batman wins only becasue the crepper wouldn't come after him.

Because he's not weak, right? That's the Creeper's thing, isn't it? To go after the weak?

If the crepper did batman would die.

Why would he die, by default? What are your reasons?

 

[IndyJokerJones]

It does, actually. And that's what new threads are for, right? So different topics can be discussed without the confusion of other topics being talked about at the same time? That's what I was led to believe, anyways.

But stating "because each battle is different" isn't a legitimate argument that proves individual flooding threads are better than one localized thread.

You know, if you were paying attention. Maybe she should have quoted something? Would that have helped? I mean, I'm just saying. Not to be rude or anything.

Too late for that. Don't insult me like that when I make a perfectly valid argument to reduce the congestion of threads that rarely get past a single page of conversation and contribute little to nothing.

And that's what new threads are for, right? So different topics can be discussed without the confusion of other topics being talked about at the same time? That's what I was led to believe, anyways.

But all of these "Batman vs" threads aren't different topics, they're the same exact topic! Would Batman win against X? It's like this: Group 1 talks about A vs. B while 3 rooms over Group 2 talks about A vs. C and down the hall Group 3 talks about A vs. D. All of these people are talking about A vs. another thing, the same topic. Would it not make more sense to bring all of these groups into the same room with a sign on the door saying "A vs. ___ Room" thus bringing these people together for the same reason instead of dividing them and taking up other rooms that could be used for other things?

 

[Ultra Lantern]

Can we get back on topic here?

Please discuss the battle between Batman and The Creeper.

 

[spider13]

Batman wins becasue the creeper wouldn't come after him.

 

[OmarBatGeek]

@spider13: But let's say for conversation's sake that the creeper did for some reason go after Bats. Why don't you think Batman would be able to survive?

@Ultra Lanter: Sorry about that. Like I said maybe his argument should be posted in a seperate thread.

@IndyJokerJones: But I don't understand why it's such a big deal in the first place. Each different "battle" has different conversation about it, because there are many different things to consider for each individual player. If you tried to put all of that together nobody would be able to keep up with the conversations and all of them would go dead. And what does that accomplish? This is supposed to be a fun website for fans to discuss and hypothesize together. No reason to ruin the fun, right?

 

[Ultra Lantern]

@spider13: But let's say for conversation's sake that the creeper did for some reason go after Bats. Why don't you think Batman would be able to survive?
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@Ultra Lantern: Sorry about that. Like I said maybe his argument should be posted in a seperate thread.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@IndyJokerJones: But I don't understand why it's such a big deal in the first place. Each different "battle" has different conversation about it, because there are many different things to consider for each individual player. If you tried to put all of that together nobody would be able to keep up with the conversations and all of them would go dead. And what does that accomplish? This is supposed to be a fun website for fans to discuss and hypothesize together. No reason to ruin the fun, right?

You're correct on that.

 

[spider13]

If batman went up against the creeper then his dead.

 

[OmarBatGeek]

Haha that's still not really a reason, spider13 xD

 

[Ultra Lantern]

If batman went up against the creeper then his dead.

And your reasoning is?

 

[spider13]

Batman cannot survive 23 days of the creeper coming after him.

 

[Knight Rise]

Batman cannot survive 23 days of the creeper coming after him.

Did you say 23 days? 23?

 

[OmarBatGeek]

Did you say 23 days? 23?

The Creeper awakens every 23 years for 23 days, so he can replenish himself or something like that.

@spider: What if the creeper didn't start going after Batman until he only had, like... five days left. Do you think Bats could survive that long?