Blurry.
But not blurry enough to hide that his costume was terrible.
Tell that to Batman v. Superman.Missed the show...forgot it was on tonight. Not really interested in watching but any Batman is scene is worth seeing once. Show looks terrible, even for CW standards.
Blurry.
But not blurry enough to hide that his costume was terrible.
She was....fine. I don't think she was particularly good, but she wasn't terrible either.
My feelings about this show mirror my feelings about the Birds of Prey movie. Initial excitement that has steadily dropped. Dare I ask, how was Ruby Rose?
Not good. But tbh, the episode on the whole wasn’t as bad as I’d expected. I do think there’s potential for improvement...IF Rose herself can improve.
My feelings about this show mirror my feelings about the Birds of Prey movie. Initial excitement that has steadily dropped. Dare I ask, how was Ruby Rose?
She was....fine. I don't think she was particularly good, but she wasn't terrible either.
Thanks, both.Not good. But tbh, the episode on the whole wasn’t as bad as I’d expected. I do think there’s potential for improvement...IF Rose herself can improve.
How was the glimpse of Batman in the show?
My feelings about this show mirror my feelings about the Birds of Prey movie. Initial excitement that has steadily dropped. Dare I ask, how was Ruby Rose?
How was the glimpse of Batman in the show?
Isn't that kind of skewed way that are trying to spin that article? These are the ratings of all the other shows first seasons.
It's like if you go on a comics review site (such as Comics Roundup) to look at reviews for say a mini-series. Almost invariably the first issue has the most reviews. Often by a large margin.True but the article was comparing it to the same slot last year which was Supergirl. But of course a new show is going to have more viewers at the beginning because they are naturally curious. I guess the next ratings boost will be the crossover.
Nielsen ratings are declining across the board each year because viewing habits are changing rapidly. They're not comparing it to CW of the past, they are comparing it to current CW, and ANY show that gets a higher rating than a show in the same timeslot a year ago would be considered a win. In the landscape of current CW, it's off to a good start, so far behind only The Flash in the demo, and topping the network in total viewers. And especially when you compare it to the debut of their other big newbie, Nancy Drew (which debuted to a .3 in the demo and 1.17mil viewers), Batwoman by contrast looks great. Any show that debuts atop its network rankings is off to a good start.Isn't that kind of skewed way that are trying to spin that article? These are the ratings of all the other shows first seasons.
Now I haven't seen it myself yet but it seems very odd to title an article "Off to a Solid Start" when its literally the worst start of any of the Arrowverse shows.
- Legends of Tomorrow debuted with 3.21 million viewers back in 2016.
- The Flash to 6.83 million viewers back in 2014.
- Arrow to 4.14 million back in 2012.
- The first season of Supergirl aired on CBS to more than 12 million viewers, but when it came to The CW, the Season 2 premiere had 3.06 million viewers.
- Constantine, which aired for only one season on NBC, also had more viewers for its premiere with 4.28 million.
- Black Lightning was the most recent Arrowverse show, which debuted to a 0.8 rating and 2.3 million viewers.
It's either he's retired or dead. I think the show will mention him and other Batman allies at some point this season.