famicommander
Sidekick
- Joined
- Sep 29, 2014
- Messages
- 3,763
- Reaction score
- 448
- Points
- 48
Jurassic Park sucks because Jeff Goldblum isn't a real scientist.
/s
/s
The reason they are going for an actual lesbian to play the part is because of the backlash over people who are not gay/lesbian/transgender/etc for a part getting it when there are plenty of people who actually are that being overlooked.
I don't blame them really because no matter what they do one side or the other is going to pitch a fit over choosing (or not) how they cast the part. Giving people who are overlooked a chance to play a role that is in part about them seems fair to me.
That argument can and has been used many times in many contexts with people arguing on both sides how it is or is not fair to exclude a particular group of people. Whenever it comes to race, gender, disability (there is a minor controversy over Dwayne Johnson playing someone with a prosthetic leg in Skyscraper) people are always going to find a reason to complain. Giving the role to someone who is a lesbian shouldn't matter.
Like I said, no matter what they do it is going to have someone complain. If they chose anyone regardless of sexuality then people will be mad they didn't choose someone who was a lesbian. They decide to choose someone who is a lesbian and people are upset they are not letting straight people try for the role instead.
Is she a lesbian?
Why does the actress actually have to be lesbian? They might find it more difficult finding exactly the right person who looks like the character and can act if it's too narrow. Are they looking for an established star or will they accept even a complete unknown?
Bex Taylor-Klaus probably isn't tall enough or attractive enough to be cast as Batwoman but she will probably end up on this show in some way. https://www.imdb.com/name/nm4545813/?ref_=tt_cl_t2
Can they finally cancel one of the arrowverse shows now, or will the CW create a new day in the week to put more superhero-shows.
Ok so we need an actress who is not too big for CW, is a lesbian and is 25-29 year old as well as all the other considerations when casting. I feel they have made their job extremely more difficult than needed, why not have it open to all sexual orientations? lots of straight women have done excellently in the past in these roles and it is disappointing that the CW have taken this approach. I am also extremely disappointing that Katee Sakchoff was in last seasons Flash as she would have been great.
Katie Sackhoff is 38 though. She wasn't looking that young in Flash as Amunet either.
I agree that it has made their job more difficult too, because they've narrowed the field. Unless they're prepared to go with a complete unknown, which wouldn't be a bad thing.
Are some straight actresses suddenly going to come out as bi at least, in order to secure this role?
Which lesbian actresses are there and which ones are too big for the CW, and which ones would be more likely to take a role like this?
Well who has worked for them before, is a lesbian and is in their 20s and can carry a show?
After doing some Googling one name being banded about is Ruby Rose:
https://imdb.com/name/nm3199307/
Not a previous CW actress and I doubt whether she would do it or be a good fit really at all. (but she is a Lesbian)
Some other names I have found:
Samira Wiley
Monica Raymund
Jessica Clark
Evan Rachel Wood (Bisexual and I doubt she would do it.)