Bale only "slurred" in Rises when he is pretty much fighting on fumes.
Wow I. Surprised at the results! To me it's Bale and it's not really close. Maybe because the action scenes and especially writing were better written, but bale just seems like a better batman to me. Ben would be a fitting retired batman (no fighting whatsoever) just because he looks so much older but I prefer bale by far.
Please, the high-rise showdown towards the end of TDK is heads and shoulders above the warehouse savagery.
As it stands now, Bale all day, everyday. I will wait till Ben's next Batman film before totally writing him off though.
Huh? Bale action scenes were better? Look, opinions and all, but REALLY?Wow I. Surprised at the results! To me it's Bale and it's not really close. Maybe because the action scenes and especially writing were better written, but bale just seems like a better batman to me. Ben would be a fitting retired batman (no fighting whatsoever) just because he looks so much older but I prefer bale by far.
Bale's action scenes were horrid. Either you couldn't see a thing (I know Nolan wanted to make the audience feel like the criminals and it was a nice idea... for the first time only) or you could see a terribly choreographed fight. Snyder achieved to show the same brutality but actually... show it. The writing in Nolan movies (specially TDK) was very good, I agree, but very often they became expository dialogues/monologues (in Batman Begins the repetition of "fear" was borderline terrible). Bale's bat-voice didn't help either.
Please, the high-rise showdown towards the end of TDK is heads and shoulders above the warehouse savagery.
As it stands now, Bale all day, everyday. I will wait till Ben's next Batman film before totally writing him off though.
Haha yeah that was a pretty funny/poor way to wrap it up, but it was a Rottweiler !
Bale was great. Affleck IS Bruce Wayne and Batman.
Talk about making a mountain out of a molehill. Snyder was a lot more blatant about the manslaughter, but it baffles me how to this day people still act like Nolan's Batman was a paradigm of human care.Hey, Bale might have been taken out by a "really...big dog"...
But at least he didn't kick the dog in the face, pick it up and rip it's jaw off.
Then set it on fire.
And shoot it.
The difference is BaleBat's intentions. People died when he was saving people. He didn't want to be an executioner, but there was some collateral damage. Batfleck straight up really doesn't give a ****. You know he takes joy in it.
It's the take they went with, so either you like that or not. But it's the "broken, f***ed up" version of the character as Affleck said.
No gripes with Affleck, he did the best he could with what he had, but I really think his Batman was way simpler and easier to pull off than Nolan's. Most of the reasons being said about how awesome he was are about how good he looked or how good his fight scenes were. Compare that to the nuanced, dynamic characterization of Bruce in the TDKT. It's like comparing a gourmet dessert to a Snickers bar.
Put Bale in Affleck's role and he would be just as badass, if not more. Put Affleck in Bale's role and I doubt he would match up.