Ben Kingsley is The Mandarin! - Part 1

Discussion in 'Iron Man 3' started by Thread Manager, Mar 10, 2013.

  1. redfirebird2008

    redfirebird2008 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2005
    Messages:
    16,663
    Likes Received:
    0
    Read what he wrote. He didn't write what you accused him of writing. Here's the quote again:

    Notice he includes both comic book companies in the first statement and says "these companies" in the second statement. "These companies" would refer to anyone dealing with comic book properties, including DC's parent company WB.
     
    #76
  2. Ultimatehero

    Ultimatehero Life is infinite

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2011
    Messages:
    5,471
    Likes Received:
    0
    Before that it was commending Snyder for "celebrating" without "apologizing" then it went on to state that MARVEL and DC should "celebrate without apologizing" for their characters just like Snyder is.

    When the irony of it is Snyder is making just as many, if not more changes, to the overall mythology. Snyder's no more "celebrating" without "apologizing" as every single adaptation out there.
     
    #77
  3. redfirebird2008

    redfirebird2008 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2005
    Messages:
    16,663
    Likes Received:
    0
    Right, that makes Snyder a hypocrite. It doesn't mean the other guy was implying what you accused him of implying. Snyder's message is right even if his actions don't back it up.
     
    #78
  4. Ultimatehero

    Ultimatehero Life is infinite

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2011
    Messages:
    5,471
    Likes Received:
    0
    The thing is - it seems to be high-fiving Snyder rather than saying that he is a hypocrite. I might be wrong, but I didn't see anything saying or implying that Snyder was a hypocrite. Did you read the whole thing or just what I quoted? Because the post seemed very pro Snyder which did come off as odd considering.
     
    #79
  5. redfirebird2008

    redfirebird2008 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2005
    Messages:
    16,663
    Likes Received:
    0
    Here is the full quote:

    Where is he cheerleading Snyder? He goes out of his way to say that all of the companies that deal with comic book adaptations need to show more faith in the characters. That would include WB/DC. I don't see how anything he said in that post makes him a blind DC follower like you accused him of being.
     
    #80
  6. Ultimatehero

    Ultimatehero Life is infinite

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2011
    Messages:
    5,471
    Likes Received:
    0
    Agree to disagree.

    It sounded like

    A - Crimson Dynamo and Whiplash weren't celebrated and they were apologized for which made that a poor villain
    B - Mandarin was treated the same way as those villains in Iron Man 2 which made him a poor villain
    C - Snyder believes these characters should be celebrated and not apologized for
    D - Marvel and DC need to apply this same level of thinking even to characters that aren't a huge title character (B level characters (Crimson Dynamo, Whiplash, Mandarin) need to be treated just like Snyder is treating an A level character (Superman)).

    And shouldn't of said "marvel thing" just - Snyder isn't exactly a figurehead.

    Agree to disagree, this whole thing has gone on way longer than it needs to go on.

    The basic points still stand:

    - Snyder is a hypocrite for saying that since he didn't follow through with that.
    - All adaptations have changes in them and without these changes these characters would never evolve.

    So, let's let this die - shall we?
     
    #81
    Last edited: May 1, 2013
  7. redfirebird2008

    redfirebird2008 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2005
    Messages:
    16,663
    Likes Received:
    0
    Sounds like a plan to me. :yay:
     
    #82
  8. jaqua99

    jaqua99 ....I need a horse!

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2012
    Messages:
    8,301
    Likes Received:
    1
    sorry guys, I have to say this, but based on Surfer's past posts, I am more than 100% on the side of redfirebird2008 :p

    anyway sorry
     
    #83
  9. Whiskey Tango

    Whiskey Tango Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2007
    Messages:
    25,209
    Likes Received:
    0
    Same here.

    I'm not sorry for backing him up. Surfer is cool people and one of the most peaceful posters I've encountered on the boards.
     
    #84
  10. Tony Stark

    Tony Stark Armored Avenger!

    Joined:
    May 6, 2002
    Messages:
    11,292
    Likes Received:
    0
    You mean stuff like Jimmy Olsen being a chick? :)
     
    #85
  11. Ultimatehero

    Ultimatehero Life is infinite

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2011
    Messages:
    5,471
    Likes Received:
    0
    That turned out to just be a lark right? Or I think I'm using that word correctly... anyway, count me as really angry if Jimmy is never introduced and they're just saying his name as Jenny's brother to satisfy the fans lol.

    More like:

    1) Lois knowing who Clark is before he comes to the Daily Planet, possibly.

    2) Clark's birth being against Kryptonian way.

    3) Kryptonian people living underground.

    4) The Fortress of Solitude being a spaceship.

    5) No kryptonite (probably/hopefully introduced at a later point).

    6) Possible elimination of the phantom zone (unsure).

    And there's more that I'm forgetting at the time being.

    As said, I'd argue that Snyder has changed the most about the hero and the hero's world while adapting. Celebrating his alien roots, but not celebrating the comic book character himself. And out of the more recent adaptations - the least faithful to the hero. But, with that said - without changes we would still have a Superman that could only leap tall buildings in a single bound, no kryptonite, and Lex would be a crazy scheming scientist. These changes need to be there in order to evolve. Plus, I trust Jonah Nolan - he was one of the few who ever got being an orphan right without disneyfying it. So even if it's not Superman exactly as in the comic books - at least I'll have a more grounded orphaned hero.
     
    #86
    Last edited: May 1, 2013
  12. Tony Stark

    Tony Stark Armored Avenger!

    Joined:
    May 6, 2002
    Messages:
    11,292
    Likes Received:
    0
    I don't know if it's been confirmed, but I'm pretty much banking on the Jenny Olsen stuff being true.

    That said, everything else you mentioned is 100% correct on the spoilers.
     
    #87
  13. Ultimatehero

    Ultimatehero Life is infinite

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2011
    Messages:
    5,471
    Likes Received:
    0
    Jenny Olsen they've said is Jimmy's sister in an official report somewhere. And Jimmy's name is mentioned. So my only fear really is that Jimmy doesn't come into play other than just being a mention. Best scenario, he's mentioned in MOS and then appears in MOS 2 as an intern.
     
    #88
  14. Surfer

    Surfer Sentinel of the Spaceways

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2010
    Messages:
    3,263
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ultimatehero,


    It's very possible that my post might have come across in a way that made it seem like Zack Snyder could do no wrong, or like maybe I was a DC fan boy wanting to talk trash about Marvel. However, the reality is (while I do love both Universes) I would have to say I am quite a bit more of a Marvel fan and have been all of my life. redfirebird2008 got what I was trying to say right (in the earlier post), and was able to clarify it in a much more eloquent way then I ever could. "Snyder's message is right even if his actions don't back it up." For me it was all about the message, and I feel like if more director's and studio's used a statement like his as a guideline for how they treated comic characters being brought into these movies, then we would be getting better versions of some of these characters. Now this is of course my opinion, because just as I am sure there are people out there that hated the amalgrimation of Whiplash and Crimson Dynamo (as I did), there are probably some others out there (maybe unfamiliar with the comics) that loved the character as combined in the movie. So, perhaps I am wrong and somewhat selfish to want a character that is similar to the comics. Afterall what is that saying again, oh yes! You can't please everyone all of the time. So, my point is by pleasing me perhaps they would be displeasing someone else and maybe that is not the right answer either. So, who knows maybe I should just be grateful the movies are as good as they are.


    Well anyways, just wanted to clear up a few things and yes I am still looking forward to seeing Iron Man 3 on 05/04/13 despite my little gripes.


    Also, I wanted to say thanks to everyone that came to my aid and defended me during my absensce, it was very kind and really appreciated. :yay:

    Surfer
     
    #89
  15. Norek

    Norek Yvonne Strahotski <3

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2011
    Messages:
    2,476
    Likes Received:
    0
    I get the feeling that either people don't fully understand what Snyder tried to say, or that Snyder didn't use the proper words to express himself more accurately.

    People saying he made changes to the story in MoS - he didn't make those changes. The idea Nolan and Goyer had for a modern retelling of the Superman tale required a director to handle the project, and they chose Snyder - and by the way, isn't he the guy who directed probably the most spot-on, point by point adaptation of a comicbook (Watchmen)?

    The thing Snyder was getting to I believe (judging by his words "which I feel happened in the past") is that a character like Superman who had a very disappointing last film and is considered to be "outdated", boring and irrelevant by many people nowadays should not be handled with the mentality like "Oh well, if the movie sucks, it's because of Superman, because he's a boring character and whatnot" - but instead be handled with the proper care he deserves, and the awareness that this is a character they shouldn't be ashamed of when adapting to the big screen. No matter the changes made to make him more appealing to the newer generations (which I think are necessary), the core character is still there.
     
    #90
  16. kedrell

    kedrell Fork&SpoonOperator

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2006
    Messages:
    21,383
    Likes Received:
    1
    No, that would be Robert Rodriguez with Sin City.
     
    #91
  17. Vartha

    Vartha Mod of Thunder

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2004
    Messages:
    40,485
    Likes Received:
    0
    You forgot,
    that Starro is NOT in the film in any form
     
    #92
  18. Tony Stark

    Tony Stark Armored Avenger!

    Joined:
    May 6, 2002
    Messages:
    11,292
    Likes Received:
    0
    Watchmen was horrible other than Jackie Earle Haley's Rorschach, which was spot on. A lot of the acting was terrible in the film. He tried to make it faithful and didn't hold back on anything, which I can appreciate, but that doesn't make it a good film.
     
    #93
  19. Whiskey Tango

    Whiskey Tango Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2007
    Messages:
    25,209
    Likes Received:
    0
    Watchmen was awesome, you must be from some weird parallel dimension where they got Stephen Sommers to direct it or something.
     
    #94
  20. C. Lee

    C. Lee I'm not old...I'm ancient

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2002
    Messages:
    55,987
    Likes Received:
    85
    In my opinion, WATCHMEN was a fantastic movie.....but no opinion is wrong, they are just different.
     
    #95
  21. Norek

    Norek Yvonne Strahotski <3

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2011
    Messages:
    2,476
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ok.

    From what I understand, Watchmen wasn't a huge hit among the GA, but it does have a very dedicated fan following. I wasn't a huge fan, but I didn't think it was horrible.

    Besides, whether or not Watchmen is a good film or not wasn't my point, I mentioned it in a different context.
     
    #96
  22. mkilban2

    mkilban2 family1stclothingco.com

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2012
    Messages:
    3,869
    Likes Received:
    0
    I saw Watchmen maybe like a year ago with my cousin, I didn't know prior that it was based on Comics or anything just thought it looked interesting so we rented it.. And, wow did we HATE it... I don't recall anything specific that I didn't like, it was just really long and drawn out and boring, didn't understand the characters motives, just couldn't get into the movie at all. I remember we didn't say anything during the movie to each other, we just watched it, but when we turned it off we were both like " Wow, that was the worst movie ever!!" (it's no.3 on my most hated list lol)

    Not to start an argument or anything, just wanted to give my take on Watchmen.. I don't know what people like about it haha
     
    #97
  23. The Infernal

    The Infernal Mky Mk

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2005
    Messages:
    9,624
    Likes Received:
    18
    Personally I loved it. I really loved the characters and the story. There was some nice action too, but it's really the story and characters that make the film what it is.
     
    #98
  24. The Joker

    The Joker The Clown Prince of Crime

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2003
    Messages:
    49,577
    Likes Received:
    114
    After seeing the movie twice, and being able to absorb all the details of "The Mandarin", it's safe for me to say definitively that Obadiah Stane is by far the best the villainy in the Iron Man movies has gotten. I can't even say the competition is close.
     
    #99
  25. Norek

    Norek Yvonne Strahotski <3

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2011
    Messages:
    2,476
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'm with you on that, Joker. :up:
     
    #100

Share This Page

monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"