Movies205 said:Spaceballs would work so much better if you just took indiviual scenes and every week shown them on a variety show because it'd be hilarious. However, Spaceballs suffers from a terrible narrative structure, poor characters, and terrible pacing, which leads to a very dull and boring movie, which is so wierd since it's very funny.
Spider-Man 2 wins simply because it's an entertaining movie, even if it's a little cheesy
livrule said:What the ??? .......
Its Spaceballs ! ......... Just let go and have a laugh!
Secret_Riddle said:i cannot believe spaceballs is winning...do you guys actually think that in terms of quailty its better then spider-man 2?
Movies205 said:I think it's a funny movie, but it's boring, you can say that it's just a comedy but you need characters and a story for a movie to float... Which Mel Gibson usually does in spades... The Producers, Max Biallystock and Leo Bloom are two of the greatest characters ever!
to kill a mockingbird vs legally blondemister Lennon said:Lets see: one is a comedy based in an star wars spoof, the other is a comic book adaptation. One is directed by mel brooks, the other by sam raimi. One has rick moranis and john candy, the other tobey maguire and alfred molina. One is the first and only one, the other is a sequel.
What an equal comparation. What is next? Maybe airplane vs batman returns?
Majik1387 said:^That question shouldn't even have to be asked. It is loads better than Spiderman 2, though I like the latter also.