Exactly. Plus, are we just going to ignore male rape?
Let me ask you something. If a man was alone with a woman in her hotel room, and she raped him, would you say that he shouldn't have been alone with her?
If a man is wearing a pair of shorts and a tank top, and he is attacked by another man, would you say that if he had dressed differently, then he wouldn't have been attacked?
Do you think guys should use the buddy system to avoid being raped?
If a man accepts a drink from a woman he doesn't know, should he expect that she might rape him?
The issue isn't about whether or not men get raped. They do. And it's just as terrible for them as it is for female victims. The issue that we face as a society is that when a woman is raped, the blame is placed on her.
Here is the list of things said to me by family and friends (keep in mind I was raped by my boyfriend, whom I had been dating for about seven months):
"Well, you were alone with him in his apartment. What did you think would happen?"
"Maybe you should have tried harder to get away."
"What were you wearing? Maybe he thought you wanted sex."
"Was it really, really rape? Maybe you misunderstood what was happening."
"If you'd just given him sex whenever he wanted it, he wouldn't have felt like he had to take it."
After that reaction, I didn't bother going to the police. And I stayed with him another five months, because I somehow thought that what had happened was my fault.
Women victims of rape are told that the rape is somehow their responsibility. They should have done things differently. They should watch what they wear, watch were they walk, make sure they aren't alone with a man, make sure they know self-defense, make sure they use the buddy system, make sure they...
Otherwise, it's implied that not only is the rape their fault, but that they kind of deserved it. Laying the blame at the victims' feet does not serve anyone but the rapists, who feel emboldened and empowered to take what they want, because the victims will bear the brunt of the fault.
If the rapist happens to be a nice guy (or gal) who is powerful, or who has powerful friends, then they know nothing can touch them. Because they know that any victim who steps forward will not be treated as a victim, but as a suspicious person who just wants money or attention. The victim will not be believed. The people will rally not to the victim, but to the perpetrator. They will defend the rapist, and will denigrate the victim.
Why concentrate more on teaching men the value of not raping?
1 in 6 American women have been the victims of attempted or completed sexual assault. 31% of women who are sexually assaulted are injured during the attack.
1 in 33 American men have been the victims of attempted or completed sexual assault. 16% of men who are sexually assaulted are injured during the attack.
(Numbers from the National Institute of Justice)
Those numbers are alarming enough.
For female rape survivors, 98.1% of the time a man was the perpetrator.
For male rape survivors, 93% of the time a man was the perpetrator.
(
http://www.oneinfourusa.org/statistics.php)
There is a reason why men have to be the focus of the teaching on why respecting another person's being is so important. It's not because women are more important than men. It's because men are more likely to be a rapist - towards all genders.
Stop blaming victims. Stop offering useless suggestions on how people should avoid being raped. Instead, teach your children not to rape. Teach them that it's unacceptable to allow another person to be raped. Teach them about consent, teach them accountability.
It's how we learn that racism is unacceptable. We learn murder is wrong. Why is it so hard to teach that rape is also inexcusable?