Blade spinoff

[red hood 4]

Would any of you like a spinoff about a Blade character. I would like one about the Nightstalkers or Deacon Frost. What would you want

 

[Peyton Westlake]

I always wanted a Blade teamup with Moon Knight & a few other Sons of Midnight.

 

[Wesley Dodds]

I dont think it's at all necessary, but if you ABSOLUTELY, POSITIVELY have to do a Blade spin-off, it has to be a Whistler prequel, doesn't it?

 

[The Major]

I'd like to see a Bloodpack prequel.

 

[Peyton Westlake]

I'd like to see a Bloodpack prequel.

Is an intersting way to go. Good one.

 

[Pluto]

Nah.

 

[jabbatheridge]

I wouldn't be interested in a spin off with any characters from the movies, I liked Deacon Frost and Hannibal King, but I don't think either of them were strong enough characters to carry their own film to be honest. That said I wouldn't mind seeing a team up movie with Blade and Moon Knight or some of the darker Marvel Universe characters. I liked the Snipes films but felt they'd run their course by number three.

 

[AVEITWITHJAMON]

Nomak was the only character i'd be interested to see in a spin off.

 

[red hood 4]

If Frost had his own film who would he fight with?

 

[Chris Wallace]

Nononononononononononononono!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[The Major]

I wouldn't be interested in a spin off with any characters from the movies, I liked Deacon Frost and Hannibal King, but I don't think either of them were strong enough characters to carry their own film to be honest. That said I wouldn't mind seeing a team up movie with Blade and Moon Knight or some of the darker Marvel Universe characters.

The only way a Hannibal King movie would work is to revamp the character into being similar to the comic books.

I liked the Snipes films but felt they'd run their course by number three.

More like they self destructed.

Franchises shouldn't need to stop at three. If they have any good stories to tell in the future they should be able to make them. X-men and Blade would be better off if any future movies completely ignored their third movies continuity altogether.

 

[Peyton Westlake]

I think if Blade ever does return to the screen, it has to be like Batman Begins, retelling his origin in a diff. way.

 

[jabbatheridge]

The only way a Hannibal King movie would work is to revamp the character into being similar to the comic books.



More like they self destructed.

Franchises shouldn't need to stop at three. If they have any good stories to tell in the future they should be able to make them. X-men and Blade would be better off if any future movies completely ignored their third movies continuity altogether.

I totally agree franchises shouldn't have to stop a three if there are more great stories to tell. The problem is with the exception of big comic book franchises like Batman, Spider-Man or X-Men, most comic books only have three decent films in them. I couldn't imagine going to see Blade 4 or 5. I think the three films that were made covered the character pretty well. The first being an introduction to the world, the second upping the ante with something worse than vampires and the third going back to Dracula a classic character in vampire lore. Personally I think that's all Blade really needed on the big screen. I'm sure there are dozens more stories worth reading in the comics, but for a big screen movie, it has to be something extra special for me.

 

[DoubleM]

Yeah people wouldn't being saying they wanted more Blade's if they didn't screw up the third one so bad.

 

[The Major]

I totally agree franchises shouldn't have to stop a three if there are more great stories to tell. The problem is with the exception of big comic book franchises like Batman, Spider-Man or X-Men, most comic books only have three decent films in them.

What super-hero franchises do you think have less potential on film then those franchises?

What limits their potential?

I couldn't imagine going to see Blade 4 or 5. I think the three films that were made covered the character pretty well. The first being an introduction to the world, the second upping the ante with something worse than vampires

Those movies were good, but the world of Blade is hardly explored anywhere near enough to my taste.

and the third going back to Dracula a classic character in vampire lore.

Which they failed to accomplish.

Trinity also wasted the opportunity of Blade being hunted by the government, Parker Posey's group, Hannibal King and the Nightstalkers.

They could have made five good separate movies on those concepts.

Personally I think that's all Blade really needed on the big screen.

I think they can explore more of his world then just those.

I'm sure there are dozens more stories worth reading in the comics, but for a big screen movie, it has to be something extra special for me.

What exactly makes any story extra special?

 

[Rishi]

I agree... they couldve made Blade Trinity completely about Blade vs the government and it probably wouldve been fine.

I wouldn't mind seeing a Blade prequel either, with a young teenage Blade being mentored by a younger Whistler.

And an actual GOOD Dracula film has always been on my wishlist...

 

[Artistsean]

I think a Whistler prequel would work. Maybe a Nightstalkers movie where Blade and Ghost Rider team up.
Not saying I want to see them, just ideas I could see working.

 

[Ronny Shade]

Newsflash! the only good thing about the Blade franchise is ...wait for it...Blade!

This is why Blade Trinity licked donkey balls. Because he was crowded out of the movie by Ryan Reynolds.

 

[DarKush]

Sons of Midnight or the Nightstalkers (Not Blade Trinity's version) might be cool.

 

[Devil]

A Blade Origins. Yes.

 

[Ronny Shade]

Hannibal King was very cool in the comic. Too bad he was so lame in the movie.

 

[Metamorpho1977]

Wasn't Punisher one of the Nightstalkers? Wikipedia says no, but I have some Nightstalkers comics with Punisher fighting with the Nightstalkers.

 

[Matt Mortem]

You know they could always have Blade after a werewolf and then find out Moon Knights hunting the same dude and then find out that the vamps are unleashing werewolves on the public. I know thats a bare bones lame-ass way to explain that kinda plot but it'd be a hell of a way to introduce Moon Knight to the public

 

[The Major]

Newsflash! the only good thing about the Blade franchise is ...wait for it...Blade!

You didn't like Nomak, Scud, Whistler, Damasckinos, the vampire society, the Bloodpack, the doctor in the first movie, Deacon Frost etc?

This is why Blade Trinity licked donkey balls. Because he was crowded out of the movie by Ryan Reynolds.

That's only one of the reasons. Even if Blade was the only star it would have been awful.

 

[chiefchirpa]

Don't do Blade spinoff, re-do Blade.

Or better - Launch Moon Knight.