$#*! Bobby Kotick Says

Donut

Avenger
Joined
May 23, 2010
Messages
16,182
Reaction score
0
Points
31
“Within the next five years, you are likely to see us do that. It might be in a partnership with somebody or alone, but there will be a time where we’ll capitalize on the relationship we have with our audience; deliver them something that is really extraordinary and let them consume it directly through us instead of theatrical distribution. If we were to deliver a film digitally this way, I’d say an extremely high percentage would then go to the theater and watch it again.”

http://www.ripten.com/2010/09/20/bobby-kotick-wants-to-sell-you-cut-scenes/
 
If it were not content cut out and a reasonable price, I think it would be a good idea. I thought Matrix Reloaded and Revolution sucked the big one but the anime DVD accompanying it with the little shorts was a far better set of movies. From looking at "Escape from City17"/"Halflife: Full Life Consequences" and ""No Russian" (which was more entertaining than the game itself) it seems accompanying shorts than big budged Hollywood type movies seem to work alot better with games. In-game graphics still and most likely will never be for a while at pixar level. But visually, they are adequate enough for in-game movies. None in-engine cut-scenes like Blizzards are also cool but I would prefer in-game powered movies, otherwise I might as well watch a dvd. Saying that though, it is Activision, they would charge an extortionate amount, attempt to stop people making movies themselves and hold content back for the user to pay. Probably get away with it with other companies attempting to emulate the business practice as the majority of gamers are sheep willing to take it.
 
Last edited:
I dont see the problem. I dont think he stated what Ripten thought he did. I think they were just looking for a story.
 
When is this guy gonna leave the game industry?
 
Activision boss Bobby Kotick has claimed that traditional console companies such as Sony, Microsoft and Nintendo face a "struggle" to "figure out" an online future - one which the US publisher has already cracked.

In yet more incendiary comments about rival companies, Kotick said that because of Activision's online dominance, it no longer considers itself competing with "console dependant companies".

Indeed, Kotick said that Activision's closest competitor in the online space was Facebook.

"Because we're in a lot of different businesses, we have a lot of different competitors," Kotick told the America Merrill Lynch Media, Comms and Entertainment conference.

"Our competitor online [is] Facebook in some respects. Even though they don't create content, they provide it. There are a lot of new social gaming companies that are emerging and take mindshare - not from our consumer, [because they're] a different demographic. But there's the potential that some of the social games will start appealing to our consumers so we're making a lot of investments in that area.

"But the traditional companies - the Electronic Arts, or Sony or Microsoft or Nintendo or Disney - that make console-based video games, are going to really struggle [in future] to figure out how to get into these online business we're in today."

Kotick claimed that Activision's 2007 'merger' with Vivendi - which saw the French media powerhouse effectively buy the US publisher - has put it in a more secure position than any other games company, largely thanks to Blizzard's infrastructure.

"It was why we sold control of our company to Vivendi," he added. "We recognised that developing all of the capabilities that Blizzard had ourselves would probably put us in a place where we would have... not [only] a decline in our operating margin, but no operating margin. We would invest billions of dollars in all this online capability - and likely actually not produce a great result.

"There [was] so much built-up expertise at Blizzard when we did this merger - that we're now applying to Call Of Duty, Tony Hawk, Guitar Hero - that we otherwise wouldn't have had access to. That puts us in a much better position than many of the very console-dependant companies we used to compete against."

Used to compete against. Bobby's above all that now.

Kotick used his presentation to claim that Activision is no longer simply aiming to be the "biggest interactive entertainment company" - but rather the "biggest entertainment company". As in, full stop. Wowsers.

http://www.computerandvideogames.com/article.php?id=265557

If Bobby keeps pissing off Sony & Microsoft I say ban Activision games from their Consoles then see Bobby get fired rather quickly :awesome: If Bobby is so confident then lets see Acti****ison release their own Console
 
He's making me feel guilty I bought the new Spider-Man game. And I LOVE that game.:csad:
 
A general purpose thread for all Bobby Kotick related shenanigans.
 
Does this actually need its own thread? :huh:


On one hand, yes, because he says a LOT of dumb ish but on the other hand, no, because just putting them all in once place will make one had an aneurism.
 
Well, I just don't think we need a new thread every time Bobby K says something stupid because it's a fairly common occurrence.

Yea, i think it should all just go into the "Why Activisions Sucks" thread.
 
I like how you create a thread...yet have not quotes by the idiot to back-up the actual thread...:confused:
 
Guess I'll try to contribute and post some Kotick quotes off the top of my head.

1. "Sony, MS, EA, and everyone else will struggle to compete with us in the future."
2. "I want to charge for COD MP since it accounts for %60 of LIVE."
3. "Future plans to splice all cutscenes together as one movie and charge for it."
 
Someone should punch this guy to the moon.
 
So wait, Activision's online service is better than Sony, Microsoft or Nintendo's? Correct me if I'm wrong, but don't those consoles play their games? Without the console, there is no game.
 
Guess I'll try to contribute and post some Kotick quotes off the top of my head.

1. "Sony, MS, EA, and everyone else will struggle to compete with us in the future."
2. "I want to charge for COD MP since it accounts for %60 of LIVE."
3. "Future plans to splice all cutscenes together as one movie and charge for it."

With Infinity Ward getting screwed I'll probably never buy a COD game again, they're what made the games good.
 
“Within the next five years, you are likely to see us do that. It might be in a partnership with somebody or alone, but there will be a time where we’ll capitalize on the relationship we have with our audience; deliver them something that is really extraordinary and let them consume it directly through us instead of theatrical distribution. If we were to deliver a film digitally this way, I’d say an extremely high percentage would then go to the theater and watch it again.”

http://www.ripten.com/2010/09/20/bobby-kotick-wants-to-sell-you-cut-scenes/

Once I get my hands on a DVD or BluRay of a movie, I have no desire to see it again in a theatre. He also mentions charging $20-30 for these "movies" which is outrageously overpriced. I think the funniest thing is him saying these "movies" will have the biggest opening weekend ever. First off, the general audience isn't going to the theater to watch video games cutscenes, second, a gamer isn't going to pay $20-30 to watch what they've already watched on the big screen. What's this guy smoking and where can I get some.
 
i don't get it, who is Bobby Kotick?
Bobby Kotick is the boss of Acitivision and the reason Activision games suck. He makes stupid decisions, gives developers virtually no time to develop and is an overall ****
 
okay, i just read the article.........

now....... that is messed up
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"