Superman Returns Box Office correlation with comic book sales

Lestat74

Civilian
Joined
Jan 14, 2005
Messages
316
Reaction score
0
Points
11
So I was checking out my Diamond Previews catalog ( for you non-comics nerds, it's the ordering catalog for all comic book stores ) and every month they do their Top 100 titles sold. What struck me is that what characters make a top selling comic these days equates to what is top at the box office. Hear me out:

At the top almost every month is an X-Men title, usually followed by a Spider-Man title. Then the following two big franchise comics are Batman and Superman. as you get to the bottom of the top 50, you get to the Fantastic Four books and Hulk and Daredevil, etc. It's almost the exact same "ranking" in terms of Box Office for those respective characters, with the obvious big difference of Spider-Man far out grossing the X-men movies. But it does seem like the comics that sell the most also sell the most movie tickets.

It's funny how although the general public doesn't read comics, it's taste in comic book characters is almost the equivelant. So that being said, it will be almost no surprise that Superman's final take will be around that of Batman's. They sell about the same amount of comics, and Spidey outsells them both.
 
I though the 52 comic was like number 1 for a while??:confused:
 
Oh, I was talking about regular ongoing series, not "events" like 52, Infinite Crisis, or Civil War. they always hog the top spots.
 
I asked my comic shop owner about spikes in sales and he said there were spikes in general, but large spikes relative to how Supes has been selling. There are a lot of factors with this...IF and the build up to IF got folks interested. Of course, SR and BB added to the spike but it was already low in comparison to Marvel.

DC has got to pick up game...they are retooling...let's see what happens. The fact that a lot of SA elements are being re-incorporated may help. A lot of things may help, but DC will never be down...not while I can drive to my local comic shop at least:)

Comics are a great medium...I hope people support them like they should regardless of where your fandom for a chracter lies :)
 
DC will never be down as long as they are owned by Time Warner. They make far too much money off everything that has a Superman logo or a Batman logo and to a lesser extent a Wonder Woman logo. As long as they make money off that, DC will be fine as a company. Time Warner lets them do their thing and does not interfere too much, but sadly, Marvel will ALWAYS outsell them. And I say this as a tride and true DC fanboy.
 
Uncanny said:
You mean this:

http://www.icv2.com/articles/news/1850.html

Superman, Batman and Supergirl are doing very well for DC.

Is it doing as well as Marvel was I think the question? I don't follow sales and figures. I just asked my comic shop owner and that is what he told me.

I looked at the article, but again...who is beating who? I don't have the answer, but I heard that. Maybe it's not true today...hope not:up:
 
In overall sales, Marvel beats DC. Almost always. Now, I have no axe to grinde here...I'm a bigger DC fanboy than a Marvel one. Every now and then there are anomolous months where DC beats Marvel with a mini sereis or event ( Superman/Batman #26 was an "event" title due to every big name in the biz taking part in it since the issue was a tribute to Jeph Loeb's son who passed away ) But usually, Marvel beats DC in sales. DC has been and always shall be a very strong second.
 
Mike059jig said:
I only read X-men comics...good to see DC does well!!!I would like to read DC but I think I will get lose trying to find the right ones:(
That's what the comic boards are for.

Pick a few titles that sound interesting, they make a thread asking if they suck or not. :o
 
Lestat74 said:
In overall sales, Marvel beats DC. Almost always. Now, I have no axe to grinde here...I'm a bigger DC fanboy than a Marvel one. Every now and then there are anomolous months where DC beats Marvel with a mini sereis or event ( Superman/Batman #26 was an "event" title due to every big name in the biz taking part in it since the issue was a tribute to Jeph Loeb's son who passed away ) But usually, Marvel beats DC in sales. DC has been and always shall be a very strong second.
It's a shame too. Overall, I'd say DC's had the stronger comics for a while now.
 
Superman tales like Superman for All Seasons prove that silverage influence does not need to be re-introduced.
 
retconned said:
Superman tales like Superman for All Seasons prove that silverage influence does not need to be re-introduced.

LOL...LOL...

LOL....LOL

See, we ***** furiously over the SA, but Superman can't have a kid????? It's going to be back and forth until you KID HATERS get over it and let Superman progress.

NOW...that doesn't mean someone should make him totally EMO. C'mon...lol...but it's either going to be forward or backwards. DC is kind of iffy when it comes to crap like this...because of us. WE can keep Superman and NOT fill his head with worms to achieve decent stories.

LOL...thought I'd add that
 
charl_huntress said:
LOL...LOL...

LOL....LOL

See, we ***** furiously over the SA, but Superman can't have a kid????? It's going to be back and forth until you KID HATERS get over it and let Superman progress.

NOW...that doesn't mean someone should make him totally EMO. C'mon...lol...but it's either going to be forward or backwards. DC is kind of iffy when it comes to crap like this...because of us. WE can keep Superman and NOT feel his head with worms to achieve decent stories.

LOL...thought I'd add that

But the kid as just plain bad :down
 
retconned said:
But the kid as just plain bad :down

Everything around the kid was bad...THE KID WAS GREAT:up: :)

Ret, if Singer had sold his story that kid would not bother you, but he's a bastard and all the rest...lol. It's like crazy, but...well...I still love the KID:)

They will probably never do it that way in the comics. I wish Busiek was down, but he's too scary:O
 
charl_huntress said:
Everything around the kid was bad...THE KID WAS GREAT:up: :)

Ret, if Singer had sold his story that kid would not bother you, but he's a bastard and all the rest...lol. It's like crazy, but...well...I still love the KID:)

They will probably never do it that way in the comics. I wish Busiek was down, but he's too scary:O

Your probably right.
 
x-men and spiderman book have been at the top of selling lists for well over a decade, long before the idea of the films ever existed....they didnt suddenly get there because of the films.
 
About the Kid....

All of you comics fans who hate the kid....be prepared, cuz the kid is very likely to be introduced in the comics before you know it. ( Although in this case, he would not be out of wedlock lol ) When it comes to media adaptations of comics, the tail always wags the dog. Examples:

-In the 40's Superman Radio show, Jimmy Olsen was given a much bigger part than in the comics, Perry White became Clark's boss, and Kryptonite was introduced. Also, he started flying ( as opposed to "leaping tall bulidings" ) Kryptonite was introduced on the Radio Show. As these were things the public percieved as being part of "Superman mythology", they were introduced in the comics very fast.

-When the 1978 Movie came out, Richard Donner stripped away the Superboy part of his Smallville years, and changed Krypton from a 50's looking Utopian "future" to a bleak crystaline world. When the post crisis re-vamp came to Superman, these things stuck because it's now part of what the public percieved as part of Superman story.

-X-Men. Black leather in the movies...black leather in the comics. for awhile anyways...although Ultimate X-Men still has them.

-Spider-Man. Organic web-shooters ( The "Super-baby" of 2002 ) Within a year he went from classic webshooters to organic ones, because that's what the average kid now knew as Spider-Man.

So like I said, the Tail always Wags the Dog folks. Expect "Jason Kent" in no time.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
201,162
Messages
21,908,111
Members
45,703
Latest member
BMD
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"