• Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.

Breaking News! Kim Jong-il Is Dead!

I don't think it's necessarily staged. There really are people that deluded. Malnourishment combined with a lifetime of communist propaganda leads to this kind of insanity.
 
What's your favourite Kim Jong-il story?

Mine is a tie between how he wrote 15,000 books while in university and that when he was born, a double rainbow formed and two stars fell from the sky.
 
I don't think it's necessarily staged. There really are people that deluded. Malnourishment combined with a lifetime of communist propaganda leads to this kind of insanity.

The kids at the monument might not have been staged, but the older people in a room watching TV was obviously staged. Just watch the video it's like everybody was crying on cue, hell one guy looked like he was trying not to laugh.

[YT]kOquEimPp60[/YT]
 
Never underestimate beaten dog syndrome. Though, yeah some probably are faking. But then, if you're not crying convincingly, you can get in a lot of trouble. Some might be tears of joy.
 
There's always somebody more crazy that's willing to taker their place....
And there's where the very possible problem lies

This is going to be called the year of falling tyrants, Bush's imperialist forces left Iraq, Castro, Mubarak, Bin Laden, Gaddafi, Il, whose next?
Thank you :)

Good news.
Not really, he gave his position for his son, he trusts him to carry on what he was doing. Fall of a dictator is only good news if the dictator is replaced by someone good, and leaves behind him/her good fruits of labor

And of course, if the U.S government isn't involved in the repairs, they need to repair what is broken in their homeland before correcting it anywhere else
His son looks like a complete *****ebag. :yay:
Looks can be deceiving. And even if he's a *****bag now, there's still the potential he'd become more dangerous than his pa

Would people weep for our president?
Just saying :)
Everyone has those who mourn his/her demise, that's all I can say
 
Last edited:
I'm wondering if Kim's death (and the murky situation regarding his youngest son as the successor and the old guards that are still there) will make it possible for a future reconcilation and reunion of the two Koreas.

I wish...but no. I don't see that happening...maybe not ever. There is not only a completely corrupt government to deal with...but the GENERATIONS of brainwashing to work through. :(
 
I think the next leaders to go will be:


  1. Nouri al Maliki of Iraq if there is more sectarian violence or a civil war in the country, especially if there is a stand off with the Kurds over the vice-president.
  2. Bashaar al-Assad of Syria over their own potential civil war and humanitarian crisis
  3. Kim Jung Un of North Korea if there is a cou backed by the military there.
  4. Maybe the two party-system in the United States if Ron Paul won the GOP nomination and beat Obama for a second term, he would actually be independent rather than a true member of the other two.
Iran, Pakistan, Algeria, and Myanmar have too the potential to drift towards chaos as well. Cuba and China I think will eventually transition out of communism and socialism for the free market as they have already made major moves in that direction.
 
I think the next leaders to go will be:


  1. Nouri al Maliki of Iraq if there is more sectarian violence or a civil war in the country, especially if there is a stand off with the Kurds over the vice-president.
  2. Bashaar al-Assad of Syria over their own potential civil war and humanitarian crisis
  3. Kim Jung Un of North Korea if there is a cou backed by the military there.
  4. Maybe the two party-system in the United States if Ron Paul won the GOP nomination and beat Obama for a second term, he would actually be independent rather than a true member of the other two.
Iran, Pakistan, Algeria, and Myanmar have too the potential to drift towards chaos as well. Cuba and China I think will eventually transition out of communism and socialism for the free market as they have already made major moves in that direction.

I think Assad will go into exile in a country that is not a part of the ICC.

Besides, if you turn these despotic leaders over to the ICC, who knows how long those trials are going to last.
 
What does it matter? There's no death penalty. Oooh being locked up in a nice cell in the Netherlands, scary.
 
I think the next leaders to go will be:


  1. Nouri al Maliki of Iraq if there is more sectarian violence or a civil war in the country, especially if there is a stand off with the Kurds over the vice-president.
  2. Bashaar al-Assad of Syria over their own potential civil war and humanitarian crisis
I really hope these two would fall in the hands of their people and get hit to death, mercilessly

I think Assad will go into exile in a country that is not a part of the ICC.
There are hopes of him getting killed, I hope this would be true, and the aftermath would benefit Syria
 
I think the next leaders to go will be:


  1. Nouri al Maliki of Iraq if there is more sectarian violence or a civil war in the country, especially if there is a stand off with the Kurds over the vice-president.
  2. Bashaar al-Assad of Syria over their own potential civil war and humanitarian crisis
  3. Kim Jung Un of North Korea if there is a cou backed by the military there.
  4. Maybe the two party-system in the United States if Ron Paul won the GOP nomination and beat Obama for a second term, he would actually be independent rather than a true member of the other two.
Iran, Pakistan, Algeria, and Myanmar have too the potential to drift towards chaos as well. Cuba and China I think will eventually transition out of communism and socialism for the free market as they have already made major moves in that direction.

China abandoned socialist economics long ago. They don't even have universal healthcare. There is no such thing as a self-correcting, free market.
 
Cuba's not even communist anymore. Fidel admitted it failed a few years ago. Vietnam's not communist anymore either. I'm not sure about Laos , but I'm sure they embraced capitalism too.
 
Cuba's not even communist anymore. Fidel admitted it failed a few years ago. Vietnam's not communist anymore either. I'm not sure about Laos , but I'm sure they embraced capitalism too.

This is true about Cuba.

North Korea is really the only extreme left in the world for the most part. It's just one giant cult of fear and brainwashing.
 
Not sure if it's real or not, but it's funny.
Kim.jpg
 
Would people weep for our president?
Just saying :)

Yes. A lot of people would. Is that supposed to be funny or clever? :dry:

Respect for the presidency used to mean something. If someone assassinates our head-of-state that would be an awful, awful day. My mom told me once about how the principal of her school came over the intercomm sobbing informing the class that President Kennedy had been shot. The entire school was dismissed that day and everyone went home. She was crying, her parents were crying, Walter Cronkite was choking back tears on the news, everyone was crying. So yes, obviously people would weep.

As for Kim Jong, some were crying out of fear of not appearing sad enough (informers are everywhere), some out of fear of what comes next (better the devil you know than the devil you don't) and some were genuinely sad out of ignorance because they don't know any better.
 
It's communism. A unique Korean model, but still communism. Perhaps one day we'll call it "Kimism". Offshoot of Stalinist communism.

Wrong. From Wikipedia:
Communism is a social, political and economic ideology that aims at the establishment of a classless, moneyless, stateless and revolutionary socialist society structured upon common ownership of the means of production.

North Korea is a separate nation-state. It has classes (as the ruling elite are well aware). It is not based on proletarian internationalism, but race-based nationalism. That has nothing in common with the ideas of Marx. Stalin, yes. Marx or Lenin, no.
 
It's a type of communism. And until recently, they openly called it that. They just crossed it out and replaced it with Juche. Different name, same thing. An all controlling state, mass graves, a terrible economy, impoverished citizens, a leader with a cult of personality and an oligarchy of despots. That's communism.
 
Last edited:
It's a type of communism. And until recently, they openly called it that. They just crossed it out and replaced it with Juche. Different name, same thing. An all controlling state, mass graves, a terrible economy, impoverished citizens, a leader with a cult of personality and an oligarchy of despots. That's communism.

No, that's Stalinism, which has nothing in common with "communism" as it was defined by Marx and Lenin.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
201,540
Messages
21,986,415
Members
45,778
Latest member
IF Tech
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"