Brian Cox on Bryan Singer

LMason

Civilian
Joined
Nov 9, 2003
Messages
741
Reaction score
0
Points
11
From a section of a Bryan Cox interview: http://www.avclub.com/content/feature/random_roles_brian_cox
X2 (2003)—"William Stryker"

BC: Bryan Singer's sense of narrative is second to none. He's a brilliant narrative director. But it was a bit of a roller-coaster ride with him. These big blockbusters, they do take it out of a director, they really do. The stress factor is unbelievable. What I most remember is one time we didn't shoot. I came back in from Venice, Italy. I'd started filming in, like, June, and we went through to November, but I had this section in September where I was supposed to be off. And then I got a call, "Oh, you've got to fly in." They give you 24 hours to get on the plane. I waved goodbye to my wife and son, and I'm off. Venice to Vancouver. And then I got there for a scene where I've captured Pat Stewart, and I bring out my son, the boy in the wheelchair. We started doing the scene, and first of all, Bryan didn't like my costume. So the wardrobe department went off and changed my costume, then we came back and started shooting. And the actor who was playing my right-hand-man, my heavy, he wasn't on the call sheet. Bryan said, "Well, get him, find him." And so we went back to the dressing room while this actor was found and brought to the set.

So we've been sitting there since 10 o'clock in the morning, and it's now 6:30 in the evening. I get on the set, and we start doing the scene. And Bryan comes up to me and says, "You know, I don't think you're quite… You're not really having an easy time with this scene." I said, "Well, you know, Bryan, it's been a difficult day. I flew in from Venice to do this scene, I knew this scene, but I haven't been able to get going. I just need two or three tries to go through it." He said, "Well, maybe we should do it tomorrow." And I said, "No, no, Bryan, I'm happy I'm here now. But we haven't shot anything all day, so you can't be too pleased." "No, I think we should wait for it." "No, Bryan, I'm very happy to…" "No, no, it's a wrap!" And he wrapped the whole day's shoot. [Laughs.]

And everybody was kind of startled by this. But the truth of the matter was that it was his first day on a new set. And Bryan always used to slightly freak out on his first day on a new set. Well, not "freak out," but he had to get the measure of it. He always made up the time, and in fact, he was well under schedule by the end of the film. But the producers of course went nuts, seeing dollar signs and wasted money for the day. I could see Bryan all day, taking the set in and thinking, "How am I going to shoot on this?" The storyboarding is different from actually getting there on the day, and really understanding how it is—especially on those sets, which were so enormous. He cracked it, though, and after that, it was just plain sailing. A really interesting guy. A very talented director.
 
Yeah...I loved Brian Cox, one of the few talented actors in the franchise other than Stewart and McKellen.
 
He was great in the role, and I hope Danny Huston adds to the character rather than detracts from it. And he is right about Singer also, a great director IMO.
 
imo... better then the x3 director... Bret Ratner? sorry i forget... but really he just seems to be a really hard guy to work with. So hard... that they idn't want him coming back for Superman... and they're starting the franchise over.

Multiple times Halle Berry and he had fudes. And Although the movies turned out good... I think he should have had spent more time learning the background of these characters. As mentioned in interviews... he only did this movie cuz it was the closest he could get to doing Superman at the time.

I've recently worked with a director like him and i have to say... with this story of him taking his time and pissing his actor's off by taking up their time to waste... tho **** gets hard... it all comes out in the end...

Uh.. no pun intended on that last line lol... i just reread that lol.
 
^The reason they didnt want him back for Superman wasnt because he is hard to work with, though a few actors have made that claim, it was because SR didnt make enough money, just thought I'd clear that up for you.

Anyway, it doesnt matter to me if a director is hard to work with as long as he produces quality results, James Cameron is my favourite director and he has had run-ins with most people, yet his movies are mostly quality. I have only seen 4 movies of Singer's, but loved all 4 of them.
 
From a section of a Bryan Cox interview: http://www.avclub.com/content/feature/random_roles_brian_cox
X2 (2003)—"William Stryker"

BC: Bryan Singer's sense of narrative is second to none. He's a brilliant narrative director. But it was a bit of a roller-coaster ride with him. These big blockbusters, they do take it out of a director, they really do. The stress factor is unbelievable. What I most remember is one time we didn't shoot. I came back in from Venice, Italy. I'd started filming in, like, June, and we went through to November, but I had this section in September where I was supposed to be off. And then I got a call, "Oh, you've got to fly in." They give you 24 hours to get on the plane. I waved goodbye to my wife and son, and I'm off. Venice to Vancouver. And then I got there for a scene where I've captured Pat Stewart, and I bring out my son, the boy in the wheelchair. We started doing the scene, and first of all, Bryan didn't like my costume. So the wardrobe department went off and changed my costume, then we came back and started shooting. And the actor who was playing my right-hand-man, my heavy, he wasn't on the call sheet. Bryan said, "Well, get him, find him." And so we went back to the dressing room while this actor was found and brought to the set.

So we've been sitting there since 10 o'clock in the morning, and it's now 6:30 in the evening. I get on the set, and we start doing the scene. And Bryan comes up to me and says, "You know, I don't think you're quite… You're not really having an easy time with this scene." I said, "Well, you know, Bryan, it's been a difficult day. I flew in from Venice to do this scene, I knew this scene, but I haven't been able to get going. I just need two or three tries to go through it." He said, "Well, maybe we should do it tomorrow." And I said, "No, no, Bryan, I'm happy I'm here now. But we haven't shot anything all day, so you can't be too pleased." "No, I think we should wait for it." "No, Bryan, I'm very happy to…" "No, no, it's a wrap!" And he wrapped the whole day's shoot. [Laughs.]

And everybody was kind of startled by this. But the truth of the matter was that it was his first day on a new set. And Bryan always used to slightly freak out on his first day on a new set. Well, not "freak out," but he had to get the measure of it. He always made up the time, and in fact, he was well under schedule by the end of the film. But the producers of course went nuts, seeing dollar signs and wasted money for the day. I could see Bryan all day, taking the set in and thinking, "How am I going to shoot on this?" The storyboarding is different from actually getting there on the day, and really understanding how it is—especially on those sets, which were so enormous. He cracked it, though, and after that, it was just plain sailing. A really interesting guy. A very talented director.
Singer is a true perfectionist.

Willing to sacrifice a little money to make sure the actors are always rested and bringing their A game. Always needing to fully understand what and where everything is on a new location.

I'm sure, even if the story and script of X3 never changed for one single word, I think Singer would've added a touch that could have made it more special.

-TNC
 
When i said hard to work with... i was actually reffering to his views... seperate from when i brought up the arguments he had with his cast members.

Sometimes directors have this locked idea of a movie... and when the people paying him try and make it a team thing... it sometimes doesn't go smooth. I read that (and i could have read it wrong or added words to think of it differently) if he were to come back for another Superman movie... he'd have to work under their terms. That shows that he wasn't being flexible. He doesn't seem to be a team guy when obviously their fingers are pointing at him for the reason that SR flopped.
 
When i said hard to work with... i was actually reffering to his views... seperate from when i brought up the arguments he had with his cast members.

Sometimes directors have this locked idea of a movie... and when the people paying him try and make it a team thing... it sometimes doesn't go smooth. I read that (and i could have read it wrong or added words to think of it differently) if he were to come back for another Superman movie... he'd have to work under their terms. That shows that he wasn't being flexible. He doesn't seem to be a team guy when obviously their fingers are pointing at him for the reason that SR flopped.

:funny: I think you just described every director and studio relationship that's ever existed.
 
The only one who seemed to have a problem with Bryan was Halle. I don't doubt that he could be extremely hard to work with due to his perfectionist nature.

I remember Cruise saying that Steven Spielberg will make you reshoot a scene until you're ready to hang yourself.

Great directors like Singer, Spielberg, Cameron, and Scorsese know what they want so they tend to come off as stand offish and people misunderstand their intentions.
 
The only one who seemed to have a problem with Bryan was Halle. I don't doubt that he could be extremely hard to work with due to his perfectionist nature.

I remember Cruise saying that Steven Spielberg will make you reshoot a scene until you're ready to hang yourself.

Great directors like Singer, Spielberg, Cameron, and Scorsese know what they want so they tend to come off as stand offish and people misunderstand their intentions.

:up: I would much rather a director be like this than otherwise, and these are the directors that consistently produce quality products.
 
:up: I would much rather a director be like this than otherwise, and these are the directors that consistently produce quality products.

I definitely agree. I've always preferred to work with people who knew what they wanted and were honest with the work that you do or the work that they do.

Speaking from experience I'm a perfectionist myself. I write poetry and I've written over 100 poems that are in notebooks and on seperate pieces of paper.

I'm one of those type of writers where when I started writing something at first and if I hate what I wrote? For all I know it can be twelve verses or three pages of material, if I don't like it I'll crumble the paper up and throw in the trash starting over with a clean slate.

If given the chance to work with a great creators/storytellers like a Spielberg, Cameron, Singer, Scorsese, Peter Jackson, Del Toro, or Nolan means having to grit your teeth and work with difficult directors I'd definitely do it. I'd love to pick their brain to get inspiration, wisdom, and insight on how to make a character more realistic, emotional, and how to make him/her be someone that the audience can relate to. They are the the ideal directors and I'd love to work with them or talk to them to find out what inspires them to create the things that they do.

I've never had that feeling with Ratner.
 
The only one who seemed to have a problem with Bryan was Halle. I don't doubt that he could be extremely hard to work with due to his perfectionist nature.
This has been speculated for years, but I've never heard Singer or Halle confirm or say anything about it.

So, until then..

-TNC
 
I definitely agree. I've always preferred to work with people who knew what they wanted and were honest with the work that you do or the work that they do.

Speaking from experience I'm a perfectionist myself. I write poetry and I've written over 100 poems that are in notebooks and on seperate pieces of paper.

I'm one of those type of writers where when I started writing something at first and if I hate what I wrote? For all I know it can be twelve verses or three pages of material, if I don't like it I'll crumble the paper up and throw in the trash starting over with a clean slate.

If given the chance to work with a great creators/storytellers like a Spielberg, Cameron, Singer, Scorsese, Peter Jackson, Del Toro, or Nolan means having to grit your teeth and work with difficult directors I'd definitely do it. I'd love to pick their brain to get inspiration, wisdom, and insight on how to make a character more realistic, emotional, and how to make him/her be someone that the audience can relate to. They are the the ideal directors and I'd love to work with them or talk to them to find out what inspires them to create the things that they do.

I've never had that feeling with Ratner.

Agreed totally, Ratner is a studio whipping boy, he'll do what he's told and only spend what he's told and never take risks, THATS why he will never be a great director or make a great movie for that matter.

Singer, is a very consistent director who, IMO keeps churning out quality products BECAUSE he'll take risks, and worry about the shot more than the money or what the studio wants, THIS is the type of director (as well and even more so with the one's you mentioned) that you want directing movies, as more often than not they will churn out quality.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"