British Police Women shot and blown up by One Eyed Criminal

chamber-music

Infinity Ammo
Joined
Feb 21, 2005
Messages
37,188
Reaction score
3,019
Points
103
One of Britain's most wanted fugitives killed two unarmed
policewomen on Tuesday in a gun and grenade ambush.

Police said the two constables, one who was about to be married, had been deliberately lured into a trap by Dale Cregan, 29, a suspect in another double killing in the city. Cregan handed himself into a local police station after the shooting.

Either Cregan or an associate made the false burglary report to lure the officers to the scene, said Greater Manchester Police Chief Constable Peter Fahy.

"Then he has come out and shot and killed them both," Fahy told reporters, adding Cregan also threw a grenade at them.

"Certainly, it would appear to be that he has deliberately done this in an act of absolutely cold blooded murder. It's almost impossible to fathom such an evil act."

Witnesses reported hearing more than a dozen shots and an explosion. One of the officers died at the scene and the other in hospital, police said.
"PURE EVIL"

Fahy said catching Cregan had been their top priority since the murder of David Short in August and the shooting of Short's son Mark in a pub in May. Police had offered a 50,000 pound reward for information leading to his arrest.

Politicians and chief officers across the country spoke of their horror at the incident.

"What we've seen is just (an) absolutely despicable act of pure evil," Cameron said in a statement.

It is rare for British police officers, especially female constables, to be killed in the line of duty. Unlike the bulk of forces across the world, the overwhelming majority of Britain's 150,000 police officers do not regularly carry firearms, although every force has special armed units and some carry electric Taser stun guns.

The last time more than one police officer was shot dead in the same incident in Britain was in the 1960s.

In 2005, unarmed constable Sharon Beshenivsky was killed and a female colleague wounded when they went to investigate an armed robbery in the northern English city of Bradford.

That led to a heated debate over whether Britain should arm its police, but Fahy, other senior officers and politicians again said they did not want officers to carry firearms.

"We are passionate that the British style of policing is routinely unarmed policing," he said.

"Sadly we know from the experience in America and other countries that having armed officers certainly does not mean sadly that police officers do not end up getting shot dead."

Cameron said more armed units were now available than previously.
"This was supposed to be the response to a domestic burglary and that wouldn't require armed officers," he said.

Paying tribute to the dead officers, Fahy said Karate-loving Hughes had worked for the police for three years and Bone, who had five years service, was preparing for her wedding.

"Her partner only spoke to her this morning about the wedding invites and fellow officers gave her advice about to make them on the computer," he said.

Pretty messed up luring to female unarmed officers to a fake burglary and then shooting and blowing them up.

I've never heard of a criminal murdering people with grenades before.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...d-estate-false-burglary-report-shot-dead.html
62195473_cregan.jpg

Dale Creagan lost his eye in a fight with Thailand Police after one of them hit him with a knuckle duster (Thai Police don't mess around).
 
What a terrible tragedy. I wonder why British police don't carry firearms, though.
 
If they had guns they would have taken him down easily and this trategy would have been avoided. So sad... :/
 
If they don't get firearms, then why not give them bullet proof jackets ?

Maybe that costs more then a regular firearm.
 
If they don't get firearms, then why not give them bullet proof jackets ?

Maybe that costs more then a regular firearm.

The article said the first officer was shot in the head and the second shot multiple times. Nothing a ballistic vest will do for that.
 
Im keen about british police don't carrying guns. Violence only generate more violence.
 
Send this guy back to Thailand, and let the cops there finish what they started.
 
British police do carry firearms.

This differnce is every officer doesn't carry firearms this for a number of reasons.

We have Armed response units which attend crimes involving firearms as the article said. When armed officers do use guns in the UK they usually kill innocent or the wrong people.

Last summer when police shot Mark Duggan last summer there were riots across England. Police also shot innocent man Jean Charles Menezes dead in London and shot another man dead after they thought a table leg he had was a gun.

Gun crime has always been relatively low in Britain. The amount of gun homicides in England and Wales the last few years has been between 40 to 50 per year in a population of 56 million people which is considered hight by British standards but is actually pretty low. France has a similar sized population and they had 35 gun murders last year.

It might be hard to understand from cultures in which everyone has a gun or acess to one but in the UK even alot of criminals don't carry guns. Your far more likely to be stabbed than shot here. Police deaths of any kind are very rare in Britan.

I doubt these officers having guns could of saved them seeing as they were ambushed. The guy chucked grenade at them and then shoot them.
 
Last edited:
Yeh but how much pissing about does it take to get AR units out? Paper work, authorisation from up high, look at the Cumbria shootings, AR trained cops sat around in a police station waiting for the chief to give them the OK whilst a mad mans shooting up the town. If we are going to keep it as it is, they have to make it more accessible.
 
British police do carry firearms.

This differnce is every officer doesn't carry firearms this for a number of reasons.

We have Armed response units which attend crimes involving firearms as the article said. When armed officers do use guns in the UK they usually kill innocent or the wrong people.

Last summer when police shot Mark Duggan last summer there were riots across England. Police also shot innocent man Jean Charles Menezes dead in London and shot another man dead after they thought a table leg he had was a gun.

Gun crime has always been relatively low in Britain. The amount of gun homicides in England and Wales the last few years has been between 40 to 50 per year in a population of 56 million people which is considered hight by British standards but is actually pretty low. France has a similar sized population and they had 35 gun murders last year.

It might be hard to understand from cultures in which everyone has a gun or acess to one but in the UK even alot of criminals don't carry guns. Your far more likely to be stabbed than shot here. Police deaths of any kind are very rare in Britan.

I doubt these officers having guns could of saved them seeing as they were ambushed. The guy chucked grenade at them and then shoot them.

I agree that gun crime in the UK is rare and this shouldn't be used as a catalyst for anyone to suggest regular officers carry firearms. Unfortunately, in this circumstance, it might have made a difference. According to the article, Creagan approached the officers, then shot one in the head, fired multiple times at the other and tossed a grenade. I believe that had the officers had firearms and seen him approaching, they could have possibly defended themselves.

I believe in the right to bear arms but I am not an advocate of prolific gun ownership, though I do carry one on duty and keep a firearm in my home. That being said, I oftentimes wish the US were more like the UK with regard to its stance on firearms.

This is a horrible tragedy and I'm confident Creagan will get what's coming to him.
 
What a coward. Killing two unarmed women.
And seriously, one of the reasons that all British police officers don't carry guns is because they often shoot the wrong people? That info doesn't make them look good at all.
 
Sadly alot of firearms being used by the criminals in Manchester in recent years were smuggled from North Carolina by ex-U.S Marine, Steven Greenoe.

He trafficking the guns – including Glock pistols and Ruger handguns – packed in his hold luggage on flights into Manchester.

UK and U.S Border agency should be better at stop this firearm smuggling.

Yeh but how much pissing about does it take to get AR units out? Paper work, authorisation from up high, look at the Cumbria shootings, AR trained cops sat around in a police station waiting for the chief to give them the OK whilst a mad mans shooting up the town. If we are going to keep it as it is, they have to make it more accessible.

I don't remember that. There was a police unit right behind the taxi driver shooter. I remember CCTV footage of a unit missing him by minutes.

I don't know about the red tape but fire firearms are pretty accessible to firearmed trained officers. It depends on what force your on Cumbria had no AR units because its not urban and gun crime is almost non-existent up there. I know here in London if someone is reported having anything that even looks like a gun armed police will have a barrel pointed in your face within 15 minutes.

I think every force should had a AR unit but with all the budget cuts thats probably not going to happen.
 
Last edited:
I don't remember that. There was a police unit right behind the taxi driver shooter. I remember CCTV footage of a unit missing him by minutes.

I don't know about the red tape but fire firearms are pretty accessible. It depends on what force your on Cumbria had no AR units because its not urban and gun crime is almost non-existent up there.

I think every force should had a AR unit but with all the budget cuts thats probably not going to happen.

Yeh they missed him by minutes due to the old chain of command, instead of being able to respond straight away as any non armed unit they have to get the HO to ok it.. which is daft as hell. Thats what I mean about accessible the unit should be able to respond same as any other.
 
Jeez, what a terrible crime. It's like something straight out of Luther.
 
Shouting at criminals or just saying your going to taser them in the UK works half the time you don't even need a gun like in this video of Police taking down a drug dealer.

[YT]6fSVejb1CYI[/YT]
 
Real tragedy :(

I'm struggling to see how it could have been intentional on those particular officers. I mean someone called in a burglary, but they didn't call those two women specifically.

It was an attack on the police, but I don't think their genders were overly important to the killer, and TBH, I don't see why there gender's are being made a massive deal out of here as though it's more horrible because they were women.

As a women, I find that a little offensive. These female officers obviously wanted to be a part of the force for the same reason any men do, and they are aware of the exact same risks.
 
If they had guns they would have taken him down easily and this trategy would have been avoided. So sad... :/

********.... had they been armed they'd still be dead... it was a ****ing ambush with a ****ing GRENADE! The two women had only just gotten out of the car when he struck with a Grenade, then a barrage of shots..... If they'd been armed... they may have taken him with them... but they'd still be dead.

the one eyed **** set a trap for whatever officers answered the burglary call....then the coward gave himself up at a nearby police station to avoid the pissed off Armed police.

Now we'll be paying for him to sit about in a cushy prison cell for a few years before he's either shanked or let go under the reportedly new EU rulings that ban indefinite jail sentences in the UK.

I don't mean to unload on you Destructus86.... this whole ****ed up situation just pisses me right off
 
Last edited:
For some people, taking the bad guy with them is justice enough.
 
Unfortunately, had they had guns, they also may have accidentally shot some innocent people that were running because of the gun shots.

And there is no justice in that.
 
The British system is good, but no force can compete with sick people who lure them so he can shoot and grenade them. Even had they been armed, they would already have had to have their weapons out to do anything. Really sucks for the would be husband of the girl about to get married.


Anyways, I think we all know the British forces are the best in the world:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gCdTazaB0Jo
 
********.... had they been armed they'd still be dead... it was a ****ing ambush with a ****ing GRENADE! The two women had only just gotten out of the car when he struck with a Grenade, then a barrage of shots..... If they'd been armed... they may have taken him with them... but they'd still be dead.

the one eyed **** set a trap for whatever officers answered the burglary call....then the coward gave himself up at a nearby police station to avoid the pissed off Armed police.

Now we'll be paying for him to sit about in a cushy prison cell for a few years before he's either shanked or let go under the reportedly new EU rulings that ban indefinite jail sentences in the UK.

I don't mean to unload on you Destructus86.... this whole ****ed up situation just pisses me right off

If they let this psychopath go after a few years in the cell, the judicial system would need to reform. I hope this murderer gets what's coming for him.
 
Absolutely shocking.. I struggle to believe the type of people that actually share this planet with me. A guy that lures 2 police officers that he had no meetings or ties with in the past, to murder them in cold blood.

I still wouldn't condone the killings, however I could at least understand what his reasons for killing the 2 police women if he'd had some form of previous encounter with the officers that had made him consider them enemies.. but there wasn't even that. It was just a random trap set for whoever was unlucky enough to get the call to attend the call.

I'm no doubt in a minority, however it's my opinion in certain cases, this one in particular, the punishment for the criminals needs to be extreme. This man shouldn't be able to just hand himself in & go to jail for the rest of his life, nor should he receive a painless lethal injection as a death penalty. He should be tortured to death.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
200,323
Messages
21,661,200
Members
45,466
Latest member
phyllisbernhard
Back
Top