Thread Manager
Moderator
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2011
- Messages
- 0
- Reaction score
- 3
- Points
- 1
This is a continuation thread, the old thread is [split]511643[/split]
Transformers 3 is better than BvS imo. It has more fun, better action scenes and a cleaner plot.
It's the digital media syndrome, negativity has a perverse and satisfying hold on people and they aren't happy expressing it once, the dead horse that is BvS will only stop being beaten when JL's release is a few months away.
Until then the hate mongers and the fanboys alike will be going back and forth perpetually.
Stop spewing this nonsense.
Stop spewing this nonsense.
Stop spewing this nonsense.
So now people aren't allowed to state their opinion unless it lines up with yours?
Considering I paid $10 for a ticket, I'd rather see Batman have some fun with henchmen than going through the backdoor snoozfest.
Detective work need not be a backdoor snoozefest if done by a competent director. If Batman tries to sneak in unnoticed that is a good formula for high tension.
No doubt about it. It's the best Batman has fought in live action.It's also boring as hell. People want to see Batman beat the hell out of gangsters and thugs. People want to see Batman in action as he is in the comics. I never realized how badass Batman could look on screen taking out a warehouse full of goons until this movie. All the other times we've seen Batman fight in the movies, it ranged from cool (Batman 89, Batman Begins) to meh (The Dark Knight Rises). We got Batman ripped straight from the comics in that one scene.
No matter the majority opinion, the burden of proof should be on the group making the less rational statement. Can you honestly look me in the eye and say Transformers 3 had better acting and cinematography than BvS?Transformers 3 has a higher critical rating in spite of coming from an even more hated director and a less famous cast. Transformers 3 also has a higher box office than BvS will close with, in spite of the latter having a more famous brand and an additional five years of inflation and growing markets. In terms of word of mouth, Transformers 3 had a ~52% second weekend drop, BvS will almost certainly do worse.
Since T3 dominates by the independents metrics, the burden of proof is on those saying that BvS is better.
It's also boring as hell. People want to see Batman beat the hell out of gangsters and thugs. People want to see Batman in action as he is in the comics. I never realized how badass Batman could look on screen taking out a warehouse full of goons until this movie. All the other times we've seen Batman fight in the movies, it ranged from cool (Batman 89, Batman Begins) to meh (The Dark Knight Rises). We got Batman ripped straight from the comics in that one scene.
No doubt about it. It's the best Batman has fought in live action.
That's what you and up to ~28% of critics want to see. In general, there is far more appetite for a good story and good character work than a nonsensical action scene at the expense of a good story and a good character.
Batman may look like a badass taking out 10 guys in 30 seconds, but the fact is 1 man can almost never beat so easily 10 if the 10 are professionals, and even if he can he'll be reluctant to do so as it's too great a risk.
Stop spewing this nonsense.
I agree. I have a **** ton of problems with BvS but it has some joyous moments. What are the joyous moments in Transformers 3? I was bored for the entire movie.
I think people cared more about seeing those Arkham video game fight scenes than Snyder getting Batman as a character. But that's just me.That's what you and up to ~28% of critics want to see. In general, there is far more appetite for a good story and good character work than a nonsensical action scene at the expense of a good story and a good character.
Check my post history from the past few days. I enjoyed and appreciated the movie.Never saw your reaction to the film AneeFan! Curious what you thought.
Yes, and since you're going up against independent metrics, the burden of proof is on you. It is possible that you're right and most others are wrong, but you need to be convincing about it.No matter the majority opinion, the burden of proof should be on the group making the less rational statement.
Man of Steel and Dark of the Moon both had their cinematography done by Amir Mokri, and they both look really nice, both better than BvS.Can you honestly look me in the eye and say Transformers 3 had better acting and cinematography than BvS?
That's what you and up to ~28% of critics want to see. In general, there is far more appetite for a good story and good character work than a nonsensical action scene at the expense of a good story and a good character.
Batman may look like a badass taking out 10 guys in 30 seconds, but the fact is 1 man can almost never beat so easily 10 if the 10 are professionals, and even if he can he'll be reluctant to do so as it's too great a risk.
Yes, and since you're going up against independent metrics, the burden of proof is on you. It is possible that you're right and most others are wrong, but you need to be convincing about it.
personally, I don't remember anything beyond the basic plot points from Dark of the Moon. BvS though had some amazing sequences (The Waynes' Murder in particular) that I know I'll be admiring for some time.Man of Steel and Dark of the Moon both had their cinematography done by Amir Mokri, and they both look really nice, both better than BvS.
The acting is mostly better in BvS, particularly Affleck and Irons.
No doubt about it. It's the best Batman has fought in live action.
By about a million miles. The Nolan Batman fights now look horrible and clunky in comparison.