Thread Manager
Moderator
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2011
- Messages
- 0
- Reaction score
- 3
- Points
- 1
This is a continuation thread, the old thread is [split]455217[/split]
Yup. All the pieces for a scene stealer are there.It just needs a little more... push.genius, unpredictable, heroic ending, etc.
And yes... Gary would rock that role.
I sense a new thread within a few posts...
If I had to cast the movie, I'd have this:
Cooper: Matthew Mcconaughey
Brand: Anne Hathaway
Doyle: Jessica Chastain
Roth: Gary Oldman
Tars: Chiwetal Ejiofor, Michael Fassbender, Cillian Murphy
Case: Benedict Cumberbatch, Michael Fassbender
Murph: Joseph Gordon-Levitt
Donald: Michael Caine
For Tars and Case, I'd prefer if they were humanoid robots (so androids like David in Prometheus) so the actual actors could play them, but I'm fine with voicing.
Also if those leaked audition tapes are legit, which I'm pretty certain they are, then [BLACKOUT]Murph[/BLACKOUT] is now female, which is kinda a shame since I think JGL would have been great (you even could have made him a little older in the first act and just make him look like a teen).
Taking that into account I hope Chastain doesn't play him/her.
Hmmm... I can't buy who you have for Murph. He doesn't even [BLACKOUT]resemble McConaughey[/BLACKOUT] in any way.
True, but then again neither does Caine, who taking into account common sense and the audition tapes is most definitely playing [BLACKOUT]Donald[/BLACKOUT]. JGL is who I pictured when reading his part, idk he just strikes me as similar to him. However if he were to take the role it'd have to be expanded since in most of the script he's just a bit more than an extended cameo
I think Caine is playing Brand's father and not Donald but I could be wrong. But even if he is playing Donald, I can buy him being related to MConaughey rather than JGL.
I think Caine is playing Brand's father and not Donald but I could be wrong. But even if he is playing Donald, I can buy him being related to MConaughey rather than JGL.
On the other thread you said Brand has a gratuitous sex scene? Nolan is stepping things up romance wise it seems.
I can't even call it a step up. It just struck me as an unnecessary scene. It's one of thoseIMO."Oh hey, there's a female in the cast! Therefore we must have a scene where she and the lead guy shags!" things. The romance was rushed as bad place too. I get why they added some romance but it felt forced and it fell too much into cliche territory. I also felt that it took away some from Brand's character.
I haven't gotten to that part but I'm willing to bet it won't be in the final film. I doubt WB will let it be an R considering that they can sell the movie on Nolan's name and having an R limits that.
Nah. It won't be R even with that.It'll probably be just like what we saw in TDKR or The Prestige. I'm sure we'll get to see Matthew shirtless though because it ain't a McConaughey film if he's not shirtless.
Oh.
I assumed by gratuitous, you meant like.....what's the word? Explicit, I believe is what I'm looking for here.
Hmm, I see.I can't even call it a step up. It just struck me as an unnecessary scene. It's one of thoseIMO."Oh hey, there's a female in the cast! Therefore we must have a scene where she and the lead guy shags!" things. The romance was rushed as bad place too. I get why they added some romance but it felt forced and it fell too much into cliche territory. I also felt that it took away some from Brand's character.
I can't even call it a step up. It just struck me as an unnecessary scene. It's one of thoseIMO."Oh hey, there's a female in the cast! Therefore we must have a scene where she and the lead guy shags!" things. The romance was rushed as bad place too. I get why they added some romance but it felt forced and it fell too much into cliche territory. I also felt that it took away some from Brand's character.
Who is
supposed to be involved in this gratuitous sex scene? Is it Anne? She's the only female I can think of in the cast, unless there are others.