Civil War Captain America 3 villain.

[marcvader]

Iron Man being a bounty hunter and goes after Captain America who has a bounty on his head.Iron Man has a little te,and Captain America has a little team.

Iron Man's team:
-War Machine
-Black Widow
-Blade
-Mr.Fantastic

Captain America's team:
-Falcon
-Spider-Man
-Wolverine
-Punisher

Go to your room!

 

[GoldGoblin]

If this is about civil war,shouldn't there be a lot of heroes from other movies in this?

 

[Heretic]

That's why I doubt this is Civil War but instead will be the spark that eventually explodes into a Civil War.

 

[Tony Stark]

No one really knows anything about this right now, but based on Marvel's track record, this is not going to be anything like Civil war. The only thing that will probably resemble Civil war is that it's a dispute between Cap and Iron Man.

 

[BoredGuy]

Ya know, everybody keeps saying that
but this isn't Age of Ultron

Whedon was already working on an Ultron story, and they went with that title because they thought it was cool. No more No less. The comic story was brand new and far from iconic when the movie title was announced.

Civil War, on the other hand, is going to at least somewhat resemble the comics. There will be conflict between factions, public perception of heroes playing a large part, Cap and Stark coming to blows over a fundamental disagreement, issues of liberty vs security, and possibly even (if the rumors turn out to be tru) Spider-man caught in the middle of it all. Plus the fact that Civil War IS pretty iconic (even if a lot of people dislike it) and was one of Marvel's top-selling events, and this movie will be MUCH more similar to its namesake than Age of Ultron.

Winter Soldier is probably the closer comparison, where a good chunk of it is changed, but a lot of the characters at play, the themes, and even some specific moments are adapted almost directly.

Will it all be exactly the same as the comic? Not at all, but they're definitely calling it that for a reason beyond "it sounds cool"

 

[3dman27]

Ya know, everybody keeps saying that
but this isn't Age of Ultron

Whedon was already working on an Ultron story, and they went with that title because they thought it was cool. No more No less. The comic story was brand new and far from iconic when the movie title was announced.

Civil War, on the other hand, is going to at least somewhat resemble the comics. There will be conflict between factions, public perception of heroes playing a large part, Cap and Stark coming to blows over a fundamental disagreement, issues of liberty vs security, and possibly even (if the rumors turn out to be tru) Spider-man caught in the middle of it all. Plus the fact that Civil War IS pretty iconic (even if a lot of people dislike it) and was one of Marvel's top-selling events, and this movie will be MUCH more similar to its namesake than Age of Ultron.

Winter Soldier is probably the closer comparison, where a good chunk of it is changed, but a lot of the characters at play, the themes, and even some specific moments are adapted almost directly.

Will it all be exactly the same as the comic? Not at all, but they're definitely calling it that for a reason beyond "it sounds cool"

how could the movie spidey be involved isn't he at sony "?

 

[Tony Stark]

My point is that the end of Cap 2 there was already a plot line for the next film. Shield underground, Cap on his own, and Sam and Cap wanting to track down Bucky. They aren't going to abandon that plot line for a story involving Spider-man.

Don't think Ultron either, think Extremis. That story line was very loosely based on the comics, and many would say doesn't resemble the comics at all, as Tony never takes the Extremis formula himself.

I don't doubt that there will be a fundamental difference between Cap and Tony, on liberty vs. security. They aren't going to introduce Spider-man in a plot where there are already story lines in place on where the film is going.

No one really knows what this is going to be about, so anything is speculative, but I highly doubt this is going to be a cookie cutter version of Civil War.

 

[Tony Stark]

how could the movie spidey be involved isn't he at sony "?

Sony and Marvel have been having talks about sharing the rights to the character. I think the idea is that Marvel will help Sony to gain interest back in the character, as TASM2 proved that there is a lot of franchise fatigue.

What's happened in the talks is anyones guess, and it's no sure thing Marvel will be able to use the character. Sony doesn't really have any IP at the moment. They don't even own Bond, MGM does, they just have the distribution rights. Spider-man is by far their most lucrative property, but his stock has gone way down.

 

[Chris B]

Even if Iron Man is involved, I'd imagine that there'll still be a proper villain in here.

 

[Dasher10]

Sony and Marvel have been having talks about sharing the rights to the character. I think the idea is that Marvel will help Sony to gain interest back in the character, as TASM2 proved that there is a lot of franchise fatigue.

What's happened in the talks is anyones guess, and it's no sure thing Marvel will be able to use the character. Sony doesn't really have any IP at the moment. They don't even own Bond, MGM does, they just have the distribution rights. Spider-man is by far their most lucrative property, but his stock has gone way down.

It'll probably be the same deal as Hulk with Universal. Marvel makes the film, Universal distributes it and Spider-Man can join the Heroes for Hire... I mean DEFENDERS with Daredevil, Iron Fist, Jewel and Luke Cage (and probably also Misty Knight, Elektra and Coleen Wing + Moon Knight, Echo, Punisher and She-Hulk come Defenders 2).

 

[scatterax]

Obviously the main focus of cap 3 will be tying up the winter soldier story they introduced in 2. Obviously cap in the 2nd movie decided Bucky was still inside the winter soldier somewhere and can be redeemed. So he would want to accept him as an avenger. My guess is iron man will want to hold him accountable for his actions as winter soldier, regardless of whether or not he was brain washed. It was alluded to in cap 2 that Bucky was involved in the death of Howard stark, so I'm willing to bet that this will come to light, making it personal for tony. I'm not sure how, but I'm also guessing the fight (disagreement) over what to do with Bucky is what sparks the desire for a registration act. Like maybe by the end it gets resolved where Bucky gets spared from federal prison or death, but only under the condition that he basically has to Sorensen his freedom to the american government, and has to fight for good under strict supervision rather than independently like the other heroes. This would lead stark to want the others to register as agents of America to prevent winter soldiers of the future, but also cause cap to want to stand up against a solution he feels is unconstitutional and compromising.

 

[scatterax]

I don't think stark is the "villain" of this movie. He's an antagonist to Steve for sure, but I got the vibe from the article that his part would be out of armor and ore of a supporting role. I think cap will have a villain to physically take down, TWS to reconcile with, and a tony stark subplot. Tony as a strait "villain" would be as out of character for MCU stark as civil war was for 616 stark.

Edit- Starks relationship to Steve will either resemble Rhodes in IM2 or that senator from IM2. He's either there to say cap is acting out of line or he's there with a political agenda that cap won't stand for.

 

[Rowsdower!]

The South.

 

[Guard82]

I don't think stark is the "villain" of this movie. He's an antagonist to Steve for sure, but I got the vibe from the article that his part would be out of armor and ore of a supporting role. I think cap will have a villain to physically take down, TWS to reconcile with, and a tony stark subplot. Tony as a strait "villain" would be as out of character for MCU stark as civil war was for 616 stark.

Edit- Starks relationship to Steve will either resemble Rhodes in IM2 or that senator from IM2. He's either there to say cap is acting out of line or he's there with a political agenda that cap won't stand for.

Agreed. Steve and Tony will probably have an enemy besides each other to fight in the movie, which will force them to at least temporarily put aside their differences to defeat the villain. The villain could easily be someone like Zemo leading his own Hydra faction.

 

[scatterax]

Look at the winter soldier. Did the comic book story of the same name have a hydra infestation as its main plot or an origin for falcon? Look at age of ultron. I've seen no wolverine in those trailers or sue storm and they were regrettably the focus of that run. Marvel has a way of taking the spirit of comic book stories and doing completely different takes. Armor wars in IM2? Extremis in IM3. Reworked origins for everyone thus far. They already said this would be very different from the comic series. Just like dc's versus movie this will end with the heroes putting there differences aside to face a greater threat.

 

[Guard82]

Look at the winter soldier. Did the comic book story of the same name have a hydra infestation as its main plot or an origin for falcon? Look at age of ultron. I've seen no wolverine in those trailers or sue storm and they were regrettably the focus of that run. Marvel has a way of taking the spirit of comic book stories and doing completely different takes. Armor wars in IM2? Extremis in IM3. Reworked origins for everyone thus far. They already said this would be very different from the comic series. Just like dc's versus movie this will end with the heroes putting there differences aside to face a greater threat.

That's right, and the movies tend to take the best elements of several stories and combine them together to make a story that works perfectly on the big screen. They will also discard elements that don't work (for example, the Cosmic Cube played a large role in the comic book version of the Winter Soldier story, but that wouldn't have worked well at all in the film version). I hope they simplify and streamline the Civil War story in the film version, because the comic book version became too ponderous and messy, in my opinion.

 

[Slushy]

The Red Skull will be the mastermind behind The Civil War, but I'm hoping for Taskmaster's involvement.

 

[Lilbaz]

The Red Skull will be the mastermind behind The Civil War, but I'm hoping Taskmaster's involvement.

Why the Red Skull? You have the God of mischief sitting on the throne of Asgard. He'd love nothing more than to turn 2 of his enemies against each other.

 

[Verick808]

The Civil War should be a human thing. I don't really feel like we need another avengers plot surrounding Loki either.

 

[3dman27]

Why the Red Skull? You have the God of mischief sitting on the throne of Asgard. He'd love nothing more than to turn 2 of his enemies against each other.

true but verrick808 has a valid point

 

[cherokeesam]

Why the Red Skull? You have the God of mischief sitting on the throne of Asgard. He'd love nothing more than to turn 2 of his enemies against each other.

To what end? Why would Loki care about Midgard anymore, now that he's got Asgard, the throne he always *really* wanted? And Thor is still his enemy, not Cap or Tony. Yeah, he probably nurses a personal grudge against Stark now after their little tete-a-tete in Stark Tower, but not enough to feel like he needs to start meddling in his affairs from across the universe.

 

[ThePowerCosmic]

The Red Skull will be the mastermind behind The Civil War, but I'm hoping Taskmaster's involvement.

It should be Baron Zemo.

 

[Drizzle]

I'm thinking that the main villain should be Baron Zemo, with Crossbones as a secondary villain. I also want to see a hint that Red Skull is still alive in the cosmos somewhere maybe to set him up as a pawn for Thanos in Infinity War, but that's really wishful thinking.

 

[Silvermoth]

I wonder if nitro will turn up? It's difficult to think of the civil war without him

 

[cherokeesam]

I wonder if nitro will turn up? It's difficult to think of the civil war without him

Eh, The Stamford Incident doesn't have to be literal....i.e., you don't have to officially have Nitro, Speedball, the reality TV show, etc., to set off Civil War. All that's needed is an incident where a lot of collateral damage and civilian casualties are caused by a superhero(es) doing something incredibly stupid. Ultron has that covered, on a MUCH more epic scale than Stamford ever did.