xmenfilesfan05
Civilian
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2005
- Messages
- 923
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 11
Straight to the heart Misto...straight to the heart...I'm surprised at you though...didn't think you'd snap so quickly...totally uncalled for.
that's what I've been doing since the first movie. Treating it as another universe. A universe in which, despite being totally different, Rogue is still a good character.Great...another Misto rant and rave that makes absolutely no sense...why can't we just admit, since we are talking about universes, that the movies are their own universe, something original and bold, but still retain the spirit of X-Men...and that some portrayels, are not as bad as some seem to believe.
Yes, everybody seems to be happy with him, but for me he isn't the comic Logan.
Absolutely not. That has to be the most ridiculous thing I have ever heard. Famke is the one and only Jean Grey.I want jean to be played by someone else.
I love the movie universe! I love that it has it's own history, that characters that didn't really interact in the comics, are able to interact in the films, that you don't have to think so far back into it's history to remember where everyone is coming from. I think it's a beautiful universe and one that is seperate from any X-Men comic universe.
i think
we had three perfect actors
Ian , Patrick and Famke
Actors that did good
Hugh , Kelsey ,Rebecca
Actors that had BAD material and managed to do their best with it
Anna
Actors that had Bad Material and sunk beneath it
Halle Berry , Vinnie Jones, Josef Summers
and of course those actors that you dont know if its an actor or an actress
Omayrah
If everyone can recall back to X1, we all got a glimpse of Comic Rogue, to me it's obvious that the creaters knew what they were doing with her character, they seemed to get her right in this scene. I made this post in a different thread a while back:
I'd just like to put in my two cents about the statement that the movie Rogue is a COMPLETELY different character than the comic Rogue, that some of you have claimed is true. It can all be explained with one line of dialogue from the first X-Men movie. Let me set up the scene for you, shall I?
Marie (the Rogue character with a name given to her..oh no!) is in her bedroom with a BOY (eek!). She is explaining to him as she points at a map of North America.
"Niagra Falls...up the Canadian Rockies, and then it's only a few hundred miles to Anchorage (shakes bootie...bump-bump-bump)."
Then her little boy-toy says "Won't it be kinda cold?"
And then Rogue smiles and gets on the BED WITH HIM! "Well that's the point stupid, otherwise it wouldn't be an adventure!"
Those lines help me envision Rogue before her mutation became active. A sassy, flirty young woman who dares to do a few things that are bold. Then she gets hit with a burden that doesn't allow her to touch people EVER! Now if that happened to me I certainly wouldn't mourn that loss or feel withdrawn...oh wait a minute...YES, YES I WOULD! Of course this is all my own opinion, but in my mind when viewing the movies, Rogue is certainly more on target to her comic counterpart than many people are giving her credit. But that's just my opinion.
I just thought I'd share that little idea with everyone and see what they think.
I think all the actors were capable in their roles, YES, even Halle!!! She may not look exactly what Storm was in the comics, but she had the acting skill. Like in the second X3 trailer, Halle's acting was impressive as Storm, then when is came to the final cut those scenes weren't as good, which I don't understand. But the writing and direction helped to butcher the character.
i preferred storm with the african accent in x1 it helped the illusion. the american accent lost it for me - its just halle in a wig without it