Center for Biological Diversity - Take Extinction Off Your Plate

Alex_Spider

Sidekick
Joined
Dec 3, 2005
Messages
2,527
Reaction score
0
Points
31
How Your Love for Burgers is Driving Wildlife to Extinction

http://inhabitat.com/new-campaign-claims-eating-meat-drives-bears-and-wolves-to-extinction/

http://www.biologicaldiversity.org
The Center for Biological Diversity works through science, law and creative media to secure a future for all species, great or small, hovering on the brink of extinction.

A new campaign launched by the Center for Biological Diversity hopes to make people aware of the connection between eating meat and the endangered status of animals like wolves and bears. The initiative, called “Take Extinction Off Your Plate,” shows that meat production is one of the main causes of environmental degradation globally, and that by eating meat, we are helping to drive important predators and wild grazing animals to their permanent death.

The moment humans moved from a hunter/gatherer species to an agricultural species, we set ourselves at odds with the very wildlife that sustained us for so long. Once we staked our claim, and began to cultivate the space where wild animals used to hunt and graze freely, those same animals became a threat to our livelihood.

“Production of beef, poultry, pork and other meats tripled between 1980 and 2010 and will likely double again by 2020,” explains the Center for Biological Diversity. “This ever-increasing meat consumption in a world of more than 7 billion people is already taking a staggering toll on wildlife, habitat, water resources, air quality and the climate.”

Wolves, elk, prairie dogs, and numerous other wild animals “pay the price of meat production,” points out the Center. “Some are killed because they prey on cows; others die en masse to make room for agricultural operations; still more are put in harm’s way by pollution and greenhouse gas emissions that exacerbate climate change.” Grazing also degrades grassland habitats, destroying vegetation and damaging soil and stream banks.

Related: Surprise! Yet Another Report Shows that Eating Meat Contributes to Global Warming

NPR agrees, pointing out that ranchers also all but wiped out the Mexican gray wolf, the most endangered wolf species in the world, in the U.S. “The California grizzly subspecies, for example, was driven extinct in the 1920s by hunters assisting farmers and ranchers, according to historical documents at the University of California, Berkeley.”

And speaking of exacerbation, the Center claims that ”meat production is responsible for 14.5 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions” and “nearly 60 percent of the carbon footprint of the average U.S. household diet comes from animal products.” So animals aren’t the only ones with a future at risk. We’re literally putting our own species at jeopardy, just for the chance to raise, consume, and waste a food that we should arguably eat in moderation.

And though it’s doubtful that the world will go vegetarian any time soon, the Center for Biological Diversity claims merely reducing the amount of meat each person consumes could go a long way toward easing the pressure on wildlife.

http://www.takeextinctionoffyourplate.com
 
if you want my baby seal sandwich, you'll have to pry it from my cold dead hands!
 
Over population of the human species is what's driving animals to extinction.
 
Not when it comes to bacon :o

Unless technology develops to the point to where the taste and authenticity of bacon can be perfectly replicated without the harming of pigs to make said bacon. Maybe then I'll consider it.

In all honesty I get where you're coming from, Alex. But I myself am pretty much stuck in my ways, and I love being an omnivore (or nomnivore :hehe:). But if there comes a time where meat can essentially be "engineered" safely without any harm done to animals and slaughterhouses and the like can eventually be rendered obsolete, then I'm all for it :up:
 
Not when it comes to bacon :o

Unless technology develops to the point to where the taste and authenticity of bacon can be perfectly replicated without the harming of pigs to make said bacon. Maybe then I'll consider it.

In all honesty I get where you're coming from, Alex. But I myself am pretty much stuck in my ways, and I love being an omnivore (or nomnivore :hehe:). But if there comes a time where meat can essentially be "engineered" safely without any harm done to animals and slaughterhouses and the like can eventually be rendered obsolete, then I'm all for it :up:

There has been a research in the past years for lab grown meat actually. But I can't guarantee you that it will taste exactly like the real thing :cwink:. Even McDonalds are gonna add it to its menu. Although I wouldn't step into that chain for nothing in the world :o
* Just curious what does your paraphrase of "omnivore" mean?

http://inhabitat.com/mcdonalds-to-add-lab-grown-chicken-mcnuggets-to-its-menu/

McDonald's to Add Lab-Grown 'Chicken' McNuggets to its Menu

McDonald‘s just announced it will be the first fast food restaurant in the United States to add lab-grown meat to its menu. Following the success of Sergey Brin’s lab-grown burger experiment in London last year, McDonald’s says they will ‘grow’ their own chicken McNuggets in special laboratories across New Jersey. The move is expected to reduce the number of real chickens needed to supply the company’s 35,000 outlets across the globe.

Don Thompson, president and chief executive officer of McDonald’s, cited environmental concerns behind the company’s pledge to add lab-grown chicken McNuggets to their menu.

“With climate change raging out of control, we decided that it doesn’t make sense to use water and feed to keep real chickens alive anymore,” Thompson said. “Plus, animal rights activists have been on our case for a long time about how chickens are treated. This should put their concerns to rest.”

Indeed, Ingrid E. Newkirk, president of People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) celebrated the announcement.

“Although we think it’s bizarre that future McNuggets will be grown in a lab, we’re relieved to know that chickens no longer have to be sacrificed to feed McDonald’s customers,” Newkirk said. “But we won’t truly be happy until the company stops selling real beef burgers too, since cows suffer in disgusting feedlots across the United States.”

Before they can even think about growing fake beef burgers, McDonald’s must first master the art of making McNuggets grown in a lab taste like chicken. The company is working with scientists to grow the nuggets using stem cells from living chickens.

“We take stem cells from real chickens and add them to lab grown fat,” Thompson revealed. “We can’t tell you the rest of the ingredients that we use to make the McNuggets taste good, but we are here to assure loyal customers that they will be a lot worse than pink slime or that yoga mat stuff that Subway used.”

In response to concerns that people might be grossed out and stop eating at McDonald’s, Thompson said the American public doesn’t care what they eat as long as it’s cheap. In fact, he said, by 2025 every single item on the chain’s menu will be produced in a lab. Yum.
 
:argh: Nothing's gonna change you people's minds? :csad:
Nope, certainly not sensationalized exaggerated claims like this one.

You want to convince people to change? Start by not making them out to be monsters, trying to make them feel guilty with blatant emotional pleas and look for a reasonable, realistic message.

It should be clear by now these blame the human threads aren't going to win over anyone.
 
McDonalds using 'fake' meat in their food is nothing new. :p
 
Oh, and the lab grown ******** was already declared a hoax. I'll be back with the truthful link on that one. At least they didn't claim it was mutant chickens this time.
 
I forgot to point out the obvious before even going to get a link: lab grown meat is still insanely expensive to produce right now let alone mass produce to McDonald's for chicken nuggets.
 
Humanity desperately needs a virus to cull it's numbers. That sounds harsh, but in the long run it would be the best thing for the species.

Overpopulation is the root of the problem, but the really scary part is that countries like China and India are starting to awaken to the fact that they too can enjoy the wasteful, over-polluting lifestyle enjoyed in countries like the US, Canada, Australia, UK, France and all across Europe.
 
Nope, certainly not sensationalized exaggerated claims like this one.

You want to convince people to change? Start by not making them out to be monsters, trying to make them feel guilty with blatant emotional pleas and look for a reasonable, realistic message.

It should be clear by now these blame the human threads aren't going to win over anyone.
Actually, I'm not sure how exaggerated this claim actually is. Of all of the threads Alex has posted to this effect, this is the most grounded in fact and pragmatism.

The ecological argument is the single-most (in my view, the ONLY) compelling argument for a reduction in meat consumption.
 
Last edited:
Well, I feel great considering I'm a Vegetarian. Had a BK Veggie Burger for dinner.
 
Actually, I'm not sure how exaggerated this claim actually is. Of all of the threads Alex has posted to this effect, this is the most grounded in fact and pragmatism.

The ecological argument is the single-most (in my view, the ONLY) compelling argument for a reduction in meat consumption.
I agree it is right to reduce meat consumption but it's based on this vegan-only diet agenda of zero meat consumption and I usually dismiss whatever comes from those claims as either fake or greatly exaggerated. Pair it with the claim of lab grown chicken nuggets and it's not a far stretch to see how easy it is to dismiss them.

While the general claim is right, I'm still not convinced it isn't being overblown to draw a darker conclusion than will happen.
 
Last edited:
Alex, have you never heard the expression "nomnomnom"? :huh:

:hehe:

No. Come on. The anticipation is killing me man. Tell me already.
*Edit. Never mind I googled it :)

Nope, certainly not sensationalized exaggerated claims like this one.

You want to convince people to change? Start by not making them out to be monsters, trying to make them feel guilty with blatant emotional pleas and look for a reasonable, realistic message.

It should be clear by now these blame the human threads aren't going to win over anyone.

:huh: Chill out man. My reply to Dark sentinel was meant more of a joke than an "emotional pleas". And all I did was posting a research from the Center for Biological Diversity, not something I came up with. Don't see what's wrong with that.

McDonalds using 'fake' meat in their food is nothing new. :p

:pal: They certainly have a notorious history.

Oh, and the lab grown ******** was already declared a hoax. I'll be back with the truthful link on that one. At least they didn't claim it was mutant chickens this time.

A hoax eh..? Ok suit yourself.

farmers and scientists would make the most sense.

We have to disagree on that :o

I forgot to point out the obvious before even going to get a link: lab grown meat is still insanely expensive to produce right now let alone mass produce to McDonald's for chicken nuggets.

How is it expensive to produce when you claim that it is a hoax?
Of course it is expensive, that's happens all the time with innovation and new technology. In time the prices will go down.

I agree it is right to reduce meat consumption but it's based on this vegan-only diet agenda of zero meat consumption and I usually dismiss whatever comes from those claims as either fake or greatly exaggerated. Pair it with the claim of lab grown chicken nuggets and it's not a far stretch to see how easy it is to dismiss them.

While the general claim is right, I'm still not convinced it isn't being overblown to draw a darker conclusion than will happen.

Yeah, beware of those evil vegans, they have an agenda to rule the world and force every man and child to cut meat, otherwise the their torture will be seeing beautiful images of burgers and stakes while being tied up. Yeah, human rights are totally in danger from the "dark vegan agenda". :meanie:
Come on man, I don't get your anger about a research like this.

Actually, I'm not sure how exaggerated this claim actually is. Of all of the threads Alex has posted to this effect, this is the most grounded in fact and pragmatism.

The ecological argument is the single-most (in my view, the ONLY) compelling argument for a reduction in meat consumption.

I am getting better and better in this :o
 
Last edited:
Any one else finds very funny this part?

Don Thompson, president and chief executive officer of McDonald’s, cited environmental concerns behind the company’s pledge to add lab-grown chicken McNuggets to their menu.

“With climate change raging out of control, we decided that it doesn’t make sense to use water and feed to keep real chickens alive anymore,” Thompson said. “Plus, animal rights activists have been on our case for a long time about how chickens are treated. This should put their concerns to rest.”

:pal:
There's just something amusing in the way he refers to the animal activists as if they are a pain in the ass and he finally found a way to get them of his back lol.
 
When I ordered that buffalo chicken sub for dinner, I doubled the meat in it, but I didn't triple it. Hence, I reduced my meat consumption by 1/3 as the TEOYP website advised. So, we're all on the same page. I feel better now.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
200,969
Messages
21,868,071
Members
45,673
Latest member
zelzela
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"