Kane52630
ITS TURBO TIME
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2009
- Messages
- 124,511
- Reaction score
- 64,350
- Points
- 218
Where are the totals posted at, man? Boxofficemojo?
http://www.deadline.com/2010/07/solid-3m-midnights-for-nolans-inception/
Where are the totals posted at, man? Boxofficemojo?
I'm just worried, given that I would like this to make bank so studios take more risk in complex original films with a big scope like this. It's going to leave the mindless action & death film going crowd in the cold, same with people with little ones, but this is more to promote a wider range of films outside of conventional genres.
They dont have to be like the Agents, they could have been anything. A cloud, a fire, a ghost, Batman, etc...
What would you guys use for a totem?
What would you guys use for a totem?
I liked the chess piece idea Ariadne went with so I'd steal that.
Speaking of the totems,did anyone feel they were a little nod to the Origami Unicorn in Blade Runner?
I liked the chess piece idea Ariadne went with so I'd steal that.
Speaking of the totems,did anyone feel they were a little nod to the Origami Unicorn in Blade Runner?
I liked the chess piece idea Ariadne went with so I'd steal that.
Speaking of the totems,did anyone feel they were a little nod to the Origami Unicorn in Blade Runner?
Imagine for a moment, at the end of Star Wars, you suddenly see a planet blow up. "WTF," you think! Was it Yavin 4? Was there a second death star and it just killed all the main characters? You don't know! Nothing in the plot supports that, yet you were just shown a planet blow up with no explannation and nothing in the plot to support why. That's how I see the ending of Inception. Just a cheap, last minute clip on to confuse the audience simply for the sake of confusing them (because Hollywood believes if you confuse your audience, you're automatically a "smart," film). I see it more as a cheat.
I totally have to disagree with you on this. I refuse to believe Nolan had it end like that just to "confuse" everyone. To be honest, it's not a confusing ending. A confusing ending would have people scratching their heads dumbfounded. All his ending did was get people to think and discuss but not in a confused "wtf?" kind of matter but more of thefun kind of way."so is he still dreaming or is it real"
I don't like assuming things about people but having seen your complaints about The Usual Suspects and some other surprise ending films in the past, I think it just gets under your skin when the ending isn't served to you and fully completed. I'm not saying that's a bad thing Matt but I don't find the ending of Inception to be an F you to the audience or out of place. Other than throwing that in for fun and to get people to discuss and talk about it, the movie simply would have ended with him holding his kids. That's perfectly fine but all Nolan did was throw in that last shot just for ****s and giggles basically.
In the end, I can see and understand and even respect the points of people who liked this movie. I can see why they did. I can see how they can defend the ending. I just don't agree with them much about it.
As stated, I hope it does beat the kid & tween flicks this weekend.
There were tons of kids flowing into the theater when I left.
I really enjoyed Cobb and wife bits, I honestly was expecting her to be this angelic thing, but she always looked a bit "off", in her eyes. That and, well... the whole deal with her.
With out a doubt. I think each was symbolic to the characters.
I mentioned that on the page before. It is no coincidence I think. We all know how Nolan loves Blade Runner.They share the same kind of determination as to whether or not what everything truly seems to be. The oragami represents whether Deckerd is a replicant just like the top spinning represents whether Dom is dreaming or not.
I wish they showed the other characters totems though. Although it's kind of fun figuring out what they are.
I thought Eames totem would be a poker chip, but doesn't it have to be balanced or something?
oh man i didn't even think about that. I don't know I would have to go back and look at the camera angle and the position of the totem. That would be cool.
I don't understand all these comparisons to Blade Runner. Is it just because they're both Sci-Fi? I've seen both versions of Blade Runner and read Philip K. Dick's novel and I can't pinpoint a similarity between the two films worth notifying.
I liked the chess piece idea Ariadne went with so I'd steal that.
Speaking of the totems,did anyone feel they were a little nod to the Origami Unicorn in Blade Runner?
I really enjoyed Cobb and wife bits, I honestly was expecting her to be this angelic thing, but she always looked a bit "off", in her eyes. That and, well... the whole deal with her.

The part when
she whipped around and saw Ellen Page in the elevator, our whole audience jumped.
My friend saw it last night and called me with a question regarding the movie that I couldn't really figure out. I've seen the movie twice now and absolutely love it but the question he asked had me stumped. Help anyone?
Why does Saito age to become an old man when he dies and goes into limbo long after Cobb and Ariadne go in to rescue Fischer?
Wasn't it because he was stuck in the limbo so long that he aged much like Cobb an his wife aged when they created there own reality?
My friend saw it last night and called me with a question regarding the movie that I couldn't really figure out. I've seen the movie twice now and absolutely love it but the question he asked had me stumped. Help anyone?
Why does Saito age to become an old man when he dies and goes into limbo long after Cobb and Ariadne go in to rescue Fischer?