Thread Manager
Moderator
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2011
- Messages
- 0
- Reaction score
- 3
- Points
- 1
This is a continuation thread, the old thread is [split]524849[/split]
I am a big fan of both of those films, especially Ant-Man. But if we are going with the "generic plot" idea, they are not dissimilar to Iron Man in that regard.Ant-man and Strange are FARR from mediocre. DCEU would kill for similar critic and audience reception.
]The big problem with everything I've seen so far with WW, is there is zero originality or creative license. This movie is Thor + Captain America TFA with gender reversal. It only underscores that Warner is in this for the cash grab, not to present something new. This just after we had a refreshing take on the genre with Logan.
I'm least concerned with Gadot, and more concerned with the entire concept. But this will probably make money, but I doubt it will be little more than a forgettable unoriginal piece of work.
I disagree with this. While it does look familiar, that is because this is what you would want or expect from WW's origin. This would be like changing Strange's origin because it is too similar to Tony's.
Yeah, count me out of that. There's enough generic films in this genre, and WB making a generic movie out of Wonder Woman would not satisfy me in the least.
The problem I have with this argument, and I am not sure you are even making it, but there are excuses made for the somewhat generic nature of plenty of Marvel movies. But if WW is going to be considered "generic" it is suddenly being held up to Logan. Doctor Strange wasn't suddenly compared to GotG.They adapted Strange's story pretty faithfully so any similarities should be really blamed to Stan the Man. If they didn't, it wouldn't be Strange, it would be someone else. I agree on Ant-man although Lang is completely different than Stark and it's a heist movie so it's different enough.
The problem I have with this argument, and I am not sure you are even making it, but there are excuses made for the somewhat generic nature of plenty of Marvel movies. But if WW is going to be considered "generic" it is suddenly being held up to Logan. Doctor Strange wasn't suddenly compared to GotG.
Well they already made SS and BvS so..![]()
They adapted Strange's story pretty faithfully so any similarities should be really blamed to Stan the Man. If they didn't, it wouldn't be Strange, it would be someone else. I agree on Ant-man although Lang is completely different than Stark and it's a heist movie so it's different enough.
It is actually rather amazing how generic both of those movies are considering how they were hyped. BvS was suppose to be this big complex idea, but never came close to achieving that. SS is such an obvious poor attempt at GotG, it is bizarre.Well they already made SS and BvS so..![]()
But so many were fine with mediocre Marvel first timers.WB making terrible movies doesn't mean I should be OK with a mediocre one, especially when its the first Live Action Wonder Woman film.
I find Ant-Man a lot better then Strange, which I also really like.I don't think the problem with those movies are the similar elements in the premise but the similarity of their scripts. Strange's script was just super generic, however the fantastic direction/acting/effects more than made up for it. Not so much in the case of Ant-Man which was just eh, if not for the third act and awesome visual effects I would easily consider it the worst movie in the MCU.
I don't think the problem with those movies are the similar elements in the premise but the similarity of their scripts. Strange's script was just super generic, however the fantastic direction/acting/effects more than made up for it. Not so much in the case of Ant-Man which was just eh, if not for the third act and awesome visual effects I would easily consider it the worst movie in the MCU.
Deadpool was praised far more for the character relationships. Even as a comedy, the romance rang rather genuine. And as that is the core of the movie, it was pretty important.Every comic book origin story will be generic in some egree. Even Deadpool despite all the praise in terms of story was generic. Ant-man and Strange are good films. Strange is actually considered a great film and it's one of the most well-received MCU films to date.
WW should be a good movie first and foremost. She can get away with being generic.
But so many were fine with mediocre Marvel first timers.![]()
What do you expect from a Wonder Woman origin flick? Beyond the acting of course.Good for those people, I guess.
WB making terrible movies doesn't mean I should be OK with a mediocre one, especially when its the first Live Action Wonder Woman film.
Really caring isn't all that important. Plenty will still go see it. The question is how many. If it does less then BvS...They put themselves in this position in the first place. Everything now is riding on WW. I don't think anyone really cares about JL.
Really caring isn't all that important. Plenty will still go see it. The question is how many. If it does less then BvS...
What do you expect from a Wonder Woman origin flick? Beyond the acting of course.