Chris Wallace
LET'S DO A HEADCOUNT...
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2001
- Messages
- 35,629
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 31
Now that I think about it, couldn't Zatanna just tell Congress to "Etov on no noitartsiger"?
Lackey said:Exactly, which makes it rather odd, to me, for a man as wise and brilliant as Reed Richards to just bend over and take it.
They used to have the Suicide Squad for that. Bunch of villains they could send to Moscow or places similar and just pull off a few assassinations.Chris Wallace said:Here's a thought; if the government could tell superheroes what to do, what would stop them from, say, sending all the heroes to Iraq?
Superhero comics are still an escapist art, and therefore try not to get too mixed in with today's politics. Beyond that, most superheroes still think some wars should still be fought by humans, and not by the supers.Shawkur said:I know 9/11 happened in the MU and I assume the Iraq war has as well so I never understood why, with so many top metahumans as government\SHIELDS ops and mercs, there arent tons of them over there. Its hard to believe that they would all be opposed to the war or refuse to do the governments bidding.
Everything you said makes perfect sense. But I should've expected that opening remark.BrianWilly said:Reed could have his head up his bum, literally.
Even though I thought it was pretty out-of-character for Reed to support the registration, I thought that it was far, far more ridiculous for Sue to be supporting it, too. She of all people know how much danger her family is in constantly; her son was sent to hell and ended up needing therapy because of it, for pete's sake. She constantly battles with and often regrets their decision to be public with their identities due to the simple fact that it puts her children in that much more danger. For her to look at how worried Spider-Man is that the people he loves most are going to get killed because of this act and say "It's not that big a deal" is just downright ludicrous. It is that big a deal and she's had first-hand experience with it.
And so has Reed. He's never been an "easy way out, ends justify the means" character, in fact he's always been the exact opposite...that is, until the Illuminati and Civil War started messing with him. Before, he constantlly tried to make everyone happy and is never satisfied with anything less than the best possible outcome, and he's so smart that most often than not he's been able to think up that best possible outcome. That he's the very first person to end up agreeing with Tony on this act is just very questionable. Not as questionable as Sue, but questionable all the same.
That's true, but do you really see someone like US Agent sitting on the sidelines? I just assume the heroes who would support the war are all occupied doing things they think are more important, though. It's not as convenient as DC's WWII Spear of Destiny explanation, but it works for me.Harlekin said:Superhero comics are still an escapist art, and therefore try not to get too mixed in with today's politics. Beyond that, most superheroes still think some wars should still be fought by humans, and not by the supers.
Agreed.Lackey said:I agree... and besides all that, if Marvel wanted to keep a more unbiased approach to this, then I think they shouldn't have had the two smart guys on the same team... Reed should've sided against the registration act just to even the odds.
But that's the nice thing. US Agent hasn't been sitting on the side-lines, and least not the last time we saw him with the New Invaders.TheCorpulent1 said:That's true, but do you really see someone like US Agent sitting on the sidelines? I just assume the heroes who would support the war are all occupied doing things they think are more important, though. It's not as convenient as DC's WWII Spear of Destiny explanation, but it works for me.