Colin Farrell as Bullseye

DarkAvenger

Rock Music Lover
Joined
Jun 29, 2003
Messages
889
Reaction score
0
Points
11
I thought Colin Farrell played Bullseye FANTASTIC!!! He was great for the role and should make a cameo in part 2. What do you think??
 
Definately....he was hilarious and menacing at the same time...love to see him back.
 
Farrell's performance was brillaintly played and he understood his character unlike the other actors.

He made the film worth watching.
 
Colin Farrel sucks.

Jason Statham would've been ten times better.
 
Statham has not been cast as Bullseye, so we don't know how well he could play the part.
 
Farrell was good as Bullseye. But I must say my first choice for the role was Statham.
 
Farrell was....mediocre.

He probably was the best part of the movie (because Jen and Ben both were terrible in their parts) but I felt like he could've been even more menacing.

He's going to be in my Daredevil trilogy I'm writing (go to the "Daredevil 2" thread and read about it) but he will not be featured in the first one.
 
I appreciate Farrell's hammy performance as Bullseye. Howver, in future films, I'd prefer to see Bullseye being more menacing and maniacal.
 
the problem with Daredevil WAS NOT the casting. Other than the guy who played Elektra's father. He just sucked.

crappy direction. crappy sets. Mediocre script. Unforgivablely lame ideas like the playground scene.

But the grouping of Affleck, Garner, Favs, Farrell, and MC Duncan could have come together for something great. Didn't happen though.
 
oh and nu-metal songs, the guy who made the call to put those along with the guy who made the call to have a Johnny Storm X-games subplot in FF should be locked away somewhere.
 
If the movie were as dark as it should have been, then Farrell's Bullseye would have been unbearable. But given the fact that Daredevil took itself far too seriously, Farrell's hammy performance was a welcome bright spot.
 
Ben Urich said:
If the movie were as dark as it should have been....

Daredevil took itself far too seriously

Is that a contradiction or am I just reading it wrong? Either way I find that comment very strange coming from you.
 
The PhantaZm said:
Is that a contradiction or am I just reading it wrong? Either way I find that comment very strange coming from you.

Yeah I worded that poorly. What I meant was that Daredevil thought it was this serious superhero drama, but it was really quite laughably poor. It should have been dark and serious; instead it was just... campy and disappointing, in which case Farrell's performance was a welcome bright spot.
Does that make more sense? :confused:
 
I thought he was a pretty cool guy. Very good stuff. One of the best parts in the movie. Even better on the director's cut.
 
Colin Farell was great as Bullseye only to be outdone by........COOLIO! (in the director's cut)
I can't believe they cut him out from the theatrical release. He was fantastic.
 
he made a terrific villian. I didn't think much of bullseye until collin played him as that weird psycho with a huge ego. well done.

MY HANDS. YOU TOOK AWAY MY HANDS... MERCY?
 
the scene with him going through airport security in the directors cut is the best scene in any movie EVER
 
The Joker said:
the scene with him going through airport security in the directors cut is the best scene in any movie EVER

I haven't seen it yet, but I heard the directors cut was 100 times better then the original release, is that true?
 
Oh yeah. Definately. The story actually makes SENSE as opposed to random events. Now you get to see what connects those events. Plus the film has a very big subplot. Get to see Matt do his thing in court and out of it. :)
 
DarkAvenger said:
I thought Colin Farrell played Bullseye FANTASTIC!!! He was great for the role and should make a cameo in part 2. What do you think??

I totally agree
 
Bullseye was great in the movie. I want him back.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"