Homer J. Fong
Not a golem
- Joined
- Jun 13, 2008
- Messages
- 2,286
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
[YT]jfpnIyqieyk[/YT]
I really hope they use this as the theme.
R. Kelly was so ahead of his time there.
[YT]jfpnIyqieyk[/YT]
I really hope they use this as the theme.
If WB/DC are looking to do what Marvel's doing and build a shared universe that exists on both film and TV, then that makes this a different situation than "Smallville." The "no Batman" angle is a creative choice with this, isn't it? And I just don't see it lasting that long. Of course, this is a ridiculously early time in which to say that, and I might be wrong. I hope I am, actually. Even though I don't especially think Gordon can carry a TV series, if you're going to do a show about Jim Gordon, I want to see you do a show about Jim Gordon.
(Plus, I'm glad "Smallville" never brought in Bruce. They brought in too many superheroes as special-guest-star distractions as it was.)
Smallville not having Batman was not their choice but Nolan's he wanted his Batman to be the only Batman at the time. Hell Smallville was almost cancelled because of Superman Returns because the WB thought Singer wanted the same thing however Singer stepped in and said both could run at the same time which actually saved Smallville.If WB/DC are looking to do what Marvel's doing and build a shared universe that exists on both film and TV, then that makes this a different situation than "Smallville." The "no Batman" angle is a creative choice with this, isn't it? And I just don't see it lasting that long. Of course, this is a ridiculously early time in which to say that, and I might be wrong. I hope I am, actually. Even though I don't especially think Gordon can carry a TV series, if you're going to do a show about Jim Gordon, I want to see you do a show about Jim Gordon.
(Plus, I'm glad "Smallville" never brought in Bruce. They brought in too many superheroes as special-guest-star distractions as it was.)
Yes it did. No live action version of Batman/Bruce Wayne could be used without Nolan's approval. The Justice League had nothing to do with that. In Justice League they could not use the Batman villains because they (WB/CW) was trying to get The Batman off the ground. That show is the reason why you didn't see the villains anymore. Just like how Nolan was prepared to walk away from The Dark Knight and WB if they went ahead with Justice League. He wanted his Batman to be the only one. You almost saw the same thing with Superman until Singer stepped in and said their can be two version of the same hero. The Bat-embargo you are talking about really only applied to the cartoon because of The Batman.That had nothing to do with Nolan not allowing anything, it was a blanket Bat-embargo. I mean his rogue gallery wasn't even allowed to be used on the Justice League cartoon because of it.
They'd be better off making a Bruce Wayne series - chronicling his 7 years hiatus from Gotham. They could show all his adventures and training plus show that the LOS had been following him well before BB. They could even have it where The League actually saves him a few times without him knowing about it.
I don't know why people want a Batman/Bruce Wayne series more than Gordan and Gotham. YES I know he's Batman and that makes him epic, but why not diversify? Why not do a show like Gotham? That's why I wrote the article so that people can see there is so much potential with Gotham City outside of Batman.
Gotham Has a Potential Timeline
Does the pilot episode center around a very familiar case to Batman fans?
by Jared Larson DECEMBER 2, 2013
It looks like we may have a timeline for FOX's upcoming Gotham TV series, about a younger James Gordon.
Bleeding Cool reports that they have inside information on the pilot for Gotham. According to their source in Warner Bros., “The pilot script for Gotham has Detective Jim Gordon trying to solve a very famous double homicide.”
Sounds like they might be taking a cue from Batman Begins, having a young Gordon investigate the deaths of Bruce Wayne's parents. While time-skips and flashbacks/flashforwards are certainly possible, setting the timeline that early would also give the showrunners an excuse to not feature Batman and the more colorful elements of his rogues gallery in every episode. That seems like a bummer at first, but this could potentially mean a deeper character study of Gordon and the Gotham City Police Department than we have ever seen on-screen. Considering how much baggage Gordon carries in the comics, Gotham could make for a fascinating drama. It could also introduce classic secondary characters like detectives Harvey Bullock and Renee Montoya into the realm of live-action.
Yes it did. No live action version of Batman/Bruce Wayne could be used without Nolan's approval. The Justice League had nothing to do with that. In Justice League they could not use the Batman villains because they (WB/CW) was trying to get The Batman off the ground. That show is the reason why you didn't see the villains anymore. Just like how Nolan was prepared to walk away from The Dark Knight and WB if they went ahead with Justice League. He wanted his Batman to be the only one. You almost saw the same thing with Superman until Singer stepped in and said their can be two version of the same hero. The Bat-embargo you are talking about really only applied to the cartoon because of The Batman.
http://www.tvshowauditions.info/2013/12/fox-casting-series-regulars-for-gotham.htmlA 10-year-old Bruce Wayne is among the roles that are now being cast as series regulars on the upcoming Fox TV series "Gotham" which explores the origin stories of Commissioner James Gordon and the villains that made Gotham City famous. Shooting on the pilot episode will get underway in March, 2014 and will center on Gotham City PD rookie homicide detective James Gordon who investigates the double murder of Thomas and Martha Wayne.