Roose Bolton
Son of Katas
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2011
- Messages
- 19,511
- Reaction score
- 3,798
- Points
- 103
The original Conan film is like the Spy Who Loved Me; not really close to the original source material but an amazing film by its own right.
I honestly thought he was the worst part. Which surprised me because he was awesome on GoT. But I just found his performance flat and boring.
nobody cares there.
Why?
Yeah. The Milius movie is insanely perfect in pretty much every way.
Particularly accurate to the books? Hell no. The Dark Knight wasn't either, nobody cares there.
I don't believe he was devoid of in House of Cards or in Altered Carbon.He wasn't personality-devoid enough in Robocop for you?
You don't want to go full-on "auuughh!" Ahnuld with this (great as that was), but probably want someone who's at least interesting to watch.
They were, but I feel '82 film pushed it even further. Who knows what they will do with it within the current political climate.Yeah, 'cause the Howard books weren't hokey-macho-as-**** or anything.
'82 film is one of a kind and very much a product of it's time. The new adaptation will have much less machismo most likely.
Or females showing male warriors how to handle an axe.Just as long as we don't get an emo conan.