Comics Contributions to the Spider-Man Mythos..

Dragon

No Way as Way
Joined
May 4, 2000
Messages
10,051
Reaction score
0
Points
31
Discussions that have come up both in the past and recently have me looking over Spider-Man's run analytically. And I've come to the depressing conclusion that none of Marvel's writers/creators have contributed anything of value to the Spidey mythos aside from Stan Lee. Sure, there have been some excellent stories/arcs. But there have been no characters, or development of existing characters that have been an actual evolutionary contribution to the mythos.

So, I'm looking top the fans here for your opinions. What writer(s) do you think have contributed something new and important to the mythos? And why do you feel that it's important?
 
im not sure what writer it was but whoever came up with "revelations" to end the clone saga has surely added something. Green Goblin is now considered almost undoubtedly the greatest SM villain and todd mcfarlane's venom too. i think you've just been overly harsh.
Spider-Man as one of earth's mightiest heroes has to be something that has added to his character. Its the greatest show of him being more than just street level. There has to be and is definitely more..
 
Dragon said:
Discussions that have come up both in the past and recently have me looking over Spider-Man's run analytically. And I've come to the depressing conclusion that none of Marvel's writers/creators have contributed anything of value to the Spidey mythos aside from Stan Lee. Sure, there have been some excellent stories/arcs. But there have been no characters, or development of existing characters that have been an actual evolutionary contribution to the mythos.

So, I'm looking top the fans here for your opinions. What writer(s) do you think have contributed something new and important to the mythos? And why do you feel that it's important?

Aloha,
Very good question. In my opinion Kurt Busieks run on Untold Tales of Spider-Man, added more to the Spider-Man mythos than just about any other writer after Stan Lee.As you say, there are many story arcs that are significant to the mythos, but I beleive that Untold Tales through Busiek, made the most contribution.The fact that The Scarecrow is mentioned in the current Sensational Spider-Man #29 but only made an appearance in Untold Tales is a good example of the connection of Untold Tales to the 616 Universe.You can check out the volume 1n the Library.
Spidey rules
right click this link-save target as and remove.htm from the name

http://www.donaldspidermanthomas.com/html/cbr/11_ultoldtalesofsp/Untold Tales of Spider-man 22.cbr
 
I'd say David Michelinie made a pretty big contribution to the Spider-Man mythos. Perhaps not on an "evolutionary" scale (not really sure what that even means), but certainly he created a character of value in Venom.

One-dimentional?

Perhaps. But there's no denying the impact that character had on fans back then, all the way up to this very day. Through comic storylines, spin-off comics, spin-off CHARACTERS, cartoons, and soon to be immortalized on the big screen.

I think through Venom, Micheline created Spider-Man's true antithesis...a character that still has a rippling effect throughout the Spider-Man mythos to this very day.
 
the death of gwen stacy - the greatest contribution to the spider-man mythos since amazing fantasy 15 - wasnt written by stan lee. i mean, cmon, i know some of you are upset about the surrent standards of SM but lets not start going overboard on EVERYTHING
 
MyPokerShirt said:
the death of gwen stacy - the greatest contribution to the spider-man mythos since amazing fantasy 15 - wasnt written by stan lee.

Sure, Gerry Conway not only impacted the Spider-Man mythos with that story, but some say the entire comic book industry as well....

Conway also made some serious contributions with characters like The Punisher, who many say also changed the industry, being the first "grim and gritty" character, as well as The Jackal, who was immortalized during the second infamous Clone saga....

I'd also credit Conway with solidifying the friendship between Peter and Johnny Storm. Stan often portrayed the two heroes as antagonistic rivals, but with the launch of the first Marvel Team-Up, by the second issue we began to see the two slowly become friends, as evidenced by the handshake on the last page.
 
Does anybody here think they need to have him age to have a impact? Or are we just talking about character additions?
 
CaptainStacy said:
I'd say David Michelinie made a pretty big contribution to the Spider-Man mythos. Perhaps not on an "evolutionary" scale (not really sure what that even means), but certainly he created a character of value in Venom.

One-dimentional?

Perhaps. But there's no denying the impact that character had on fans back then, all the way up to this very day. Through comic storylines, spin-off comics, spin-off CHARACTERS, cartoons, and soon to be immortalized on the big screen.

I think through Venom, Micheline created Spider-Man's true antithesis...a character that still has a rippling effect throughout the Spider-Man mythos to this very day.

When I say evolutionary, I mean in the sense of taking Peter to the next stage, but in a way that is meaningful and lasting.

Yes, there have been advancements- graduating college, taking on a teaching career. Marriage. But Peter has remained essentially the same as he was before Stan left.

For example, Gwen's death has been mentioned. No question, one of the greatest arcs ever crafted in the medium. And I agree, as discussed in the great article written on that 2-parter (TWO PARTER- Joe Q & Joe S) that it changed the medium. But the problem is, I don't think it changed Spider-Man. Spidey was angry and edgy for about a good year. Maybe even the duration of Conway's run. But he didn't change in character from Lee's run. He wasn't for example gunshy about entering a new relationship. He certainly didn't take a harder stance on criminals, even though, the medium, via characters like the Punisher and Wolverine, would. So this is what I mean by real evolutionary changes. In fact, the Clone Saga (And Harry's first stint as the Goblin) re-introduced the very problem that caused Gwen's death- a villain learning Peter's identity. And yet, he wasn't concerned that MJ could be in the line of fire.

So this is what I mean.

As for Venom- my real problem with the character, aside from the tongue-lashing, brain eating thing- is that while he was certainly a phyiscally formidable character, he brought nothing new to the mythos. He was another dangerous character- perhaps a little crazier who knew Peter's id and wanted him dead. But he was to me, only a superficial threat. After Ock, the goblin, even the Jackal, IMO, the next classic villain needed to challenge Peter in some new manner. For example- if Venom TRULY were born out of some terrible mistake Peter made- such as his actually doing something to ruin Eddie's life- not just having Eddie using Peter as a lame scapegoat for his own failings, then Venom might work for me.
 
Kool-Aid said:
Does anybody here think they need to have him age to have a impact? Or are we just talking about character additions?

Well, maybe not necessarily age- But certainly move forward. He's still too much like the kid he was in High School and College.

For example- forgetting about Civil War and his ID reveal-Peter should by now have his own celebrity on some level just for being a photo-journalist. I know this has been dabbled with, only on a small scale, and its often soon forgotten about.

But I'm not only talking characters. Definitely Peter's own development is of utmost importance.
 
Dragon said:
Yes, there have been advancements- graduating college, taking on a teaching career. Marriage. But Peter has remained essentially the same as he was before Stan left.


I heard Stan sent a memo out after he left as EIC, or something, to stop having characters age. That might be why.
 
what adds to the mythos has to be things you associate with the character: GG archnemesis, venom & the alien suit, death of uncle ben and gwen stacy, marriage to MJ. im sorry dragon but i just can't agree with your points. they make no sense to me. i think, compared to stan lee's days, the SM mythos has definitely been added to.
 
I do agree that Peter needs to maintain a certain youthfulness. I'm certainly not of the school of thought that says Peter must always be a teen or college student- but there's no denying that part of what made Spidey great was that he was a young. It's much more impressive that this is a young guy doing what he does. Facing villains that were much older and experieinced and yet he bested them out of his drive and creativity. It's really not as a big a deal if Peter is 30-40 doing all of that as it was when he was a kid.

The fact is, that there has to be a balance. Peter needs to mature and evole as I mentioned, but not age. But then, take for example a soldier that enters the army at age 18. After two years of seeing combat, while he hasn't aged much, his character would evolve(In both good and bad ways possibly). And that's the case with Peter.

For example, after Gwen's death, and Peter and MJ starting dating, a reasonable and evolutionary way in which to deal with that relationship would have been to have Peter become overly protective of MJ. Which would have been a better way of breaking them up the first time than the reasons given.
 
That kinda makes him seem aged even though he hasn't if they do that. Marvel doesn't want to give off that feeling though.
 
MyPokerShirt said:
what adds to the mythos has to be things you associate with the character: GG archnemesis, venom & the alien suit, death of uncle ben and gwen stacy, marriage to MJ. im sorry dragon but i just can't agree with your points. they make no sense to me. i think, compared to stan lee's days, the SM mythos has definitely been added to.

Adding new visuals in a visual medium is fine. But if it's the same rehashing of things, there's no development.

Making MJ more like Gwen in order to bring them together isn't development.
MJ should have remained the party girl, flakey actress she was. There should merely have been a point at which she and Peter connected.

Another example- MJ being a model. that was a mistake with the character in my opinion, since she was established as being a character who was just the opposite of a model. not someone who stood still. She liked to bounce around, dance and perform. They should have IMO made her focused on her acting and dancing career. One of those Bohemian types doing plays and dance pieces in the village. Maybe now and then doing an independent film or some such. Having her have a unique lifestyle would have certainly added something to the relationship with Peter.

And the alien suit? How was that development? It was a plot point and turned into a villain, similar to what had happened with Hobgoblin a few years before.
 
Marv Wolfman's brief run on ASM had tremendous impact on the Spidey mythos.

He had cleared Spidey's name from the NYPD.

He put the greatest closure ever thought of with Smythe and the Spidey Slayers. If that had been the last Spidey Slayer story ever told, it would have ended brilliantly.

He took a two-dimensional character in the Kingpin (remember, at that time, it was pre-Miller's DareDevil, and the Kingpin had rarely appeared outside a Spidey book... I think there was a Captain America appearance), and put a terrific closure on his battle with Spider-Man, whom he had always considered his greatest enemy, unlike how he thinks of Spidey as a joke hero these days.

And finally, his epic ASM #200 finally put to rest the Peter Parker versus the man who killed his Uncle Ben issue. The Spider-Man saga could have ended with that comic (I'm glad it didn't), but it would have been a fantastic way to close the story of Spider-Man.

And as mentioned before by Donald, Busiek's Untold Tales of Spider-Man was written so perfectly, that it felt like what it must have been to read classic Lee/Ditko comics. Some of the best Spidey stories ever told since the days of Lee. :up:

Just my 2 cents.... :)
 
Dragon said:
As for Venom- my real problem with the character, aside from the tongue-lashing, brain eating thing- is that while he was certainly a phyiscally formidable character, he brought nothing new to the mythos. He was another dangerous character- perhaps a little crazier who knew Peter's id and wanted him dead. But he was to me, only a superficial threat. After Ock, the goblin, even the Jackal, IMO, the next classic villain needed to challenge Peter in some new manner. For example- if Venom TRULY were born out of some terrible mistake Peter made- such as his actually doing something to ruin Eddie's life- not just having Eddie using Peter as a lame scapegoat for his own failings, then Venom might work for me.

Amen :up:

Venom is overrated IMO. He's done nothing of any significance to Peter that Doc Ock and GG haven't already done, and better too.

As for the question of this thread, well aside from the obvious Gerry Conway, I agree with you Dragon, there hasn't been any writer who's taken Peter and the supporting characters to new levels the way Stan did in his day.

There have certainly been some good writers who have delivered some entertaining stories and great arcs. But on the whole nobody did it better than Stan when it came to character development.
 
Okay here are a few.

I know you've addressed some, but I'd like to readdress them.

Conaway: He made GG kill Gwen Stacy. Besides cementing in a SINGLE story that GG was Spidey's greatest foe and not Doc Ock (obviously Stan's favorite) he did change the story. From then on the comics lost something, not so much innocence as niaevity. And the industry did lose its innocence as then you could kill people (and killing Gwen was not just shock value but important). He and JRSr. did affect him as Peter though he rebounded and became resilent, was never the same (difference between him and Batman is resilence). He moved on. They also allowed MJ to start her growth from party girl to a woman who is hiding a past and may offer a more meaningful relationship for Peter than even Stan realized.

Then you have him turning Harry into the Green Goblin and having him descend into drugs and maddness permanently. You can't say they didn't deepen the character and open new avenues and doors there. Which would have me remember Mantlo for his small but signifcant contribution of taking Conaway's love story of Harry and Liz and allowing them to get married and have a son which definetly affected all Goblin stories thereafter and Peter's relationship with the whole family from Norman to Normie.

Wolfman created Black Cat. Like her or not she was an important character in the mythos and still is. One of the major love interests (just behind MJ and Gwen) who offered a new avenue for Spider-Man to go down and interesting stories. He also got Peter working full time at the Bugle and being in graduate school (interestingly Stern and Mantlo had him drop out).

Roger Stern created the Hobgoblin and if you don't see the major affect that had on Peter and the Spider-Man mythos there is no point in going on.

Indirectly Frank Miller affected them by bringing the Kingpin back and making him the number one crimelord and threat to New York in the eighties which greatly shaped those comics.

Michellin did a major thing (though to Stan's request) and had Peter get married. Like the marriage or not (or like how Michellin wrote it or not) this was a BIG change. It redefined the character. It gave him a confidant and someone else other than his aunt to protect. It put him in a meaningful relationship and did have him grow more mature and certainly moreso than when Stan left as being married is the next step in life and Peter took it and whether written poorly or well that is a huge change and important to the growth of any man or woman for that matter.

He also created Venom which was a huge contribution to the Spider-Man mythos and Todd McFarlen deserves credit there too.

Baby May shoulda' been a major one. As should have Ben Reilly (or none as IMO Ben Reilly should never have existed in the first place) but c'est la vie. And for better or worst you can say Mackie changed the landscape by bringing GG back, which really has defined Peter's life in the last decade.

Also I forget who, but the writer who turned Harry back into the GG and past the point of no return and killed him certainly changed Peter's guilt to a new level.

And JMS has put some pretty big things in. The biggest seems to be quickly being undone (unfortunately) of making him a high school teacher which showed GREAT depth and growth as he goes back to his roots and a change in personality. He also (unfortunately) has brought mysticism into the origin and you cannot say the unmasking was not a huge step (whether in the wrong direction or not) for the character.

Now whether he has grown up more, well that is debatable. He has become more mature and cynical but still can be seen as 20 something with a way too happy-go-lucky disposition for someone of his level of loss in the world. However that has more to do with Lee saying in the '70s we have to "make the illusion of change" than not. However, these were major contributions that broke that rule and that is why they are remembered before oh say the Puma or the Spot then.
 
DACrowe said:
Okay here are a few.

I know you've addressed some, but I'd like to readdress them.

Conaway: He made GG kill Gwen Stacy. Besides cementing in a SINGLE story that GG was Spidey's greatest foe and not Doc Ock (obviously Stan's favorite) he did change the story. From then on the comics lost something, not so much innocence as niaevity. And the industry did lose its innocence as then you could kill people (and killing Gwen was not just shock value but important). He and JRSr. did affect him as Peter though he rebounded and became resilent, was never the same (difference between him and Batman is resilence). He moved on. They also allowed MJ to start her growth from party girl to a woman who is hiding a past and may offer a more meaningful relationship for Peter than even Stan realized.

Then you have him turning Harry into the Green Goblin and having him descend into drugs and maddness permanently. You can't say they didn't deepen the character and open new avenues and doors there. Which would have me remember Mantlo for his small but signifcant contribution of taking Conaway's love story of Harry and Liz and allowing them to get married and have a son which definetly affected all Goblin stories thereafter and Peter's relationship with the whole family from Norman to Normie.

Wolfman created Black Cat. Like her or not she was an important character in the mythos and still is. One of the major love interests (just behind MJ and Gwen) who offered a new avenue for Spider-Man to go down and interesting stories. He also got Peter working full time at the Bugle and being in graduate school (interestingly Stern and Mantlo had him drop out).

Roger Stern created the Hobgoblin and if you don't see the major affect that had on Peter and the Spider-Man mythos there is no point in going on.

Indirectly Frank Miller affected them by bringing the Kingpin back and making him the number one crimelord and threat to New York in the eighties which greatly shaped those comics.

Michellin did a major thing (though to Stan's request) and had Peter get married. Like the marriage or not (or like how Michellin wrote it or not) this was a BIG change. It redefined the character. It gave him a confidant and someone else other than his aunt to protect. It put him in a meaningful relationship and did have him grow more mature and certainly moreso than when Stan left as being married is the next step in life and Peter took it and whether written poorly or well that is a huge change and important to the growth of any man or woman for that matter.

He also created Venom which was a huge contribution to the Spider-Man mythos and Todd McFarlen deserves credit there too.

Baby May shoulda' been a major one. As should have Ben Reilly (or none as IMO Ben Reilly should never have existed in the first place) but c'est la vie. And for better or worst you can say Mackie changed the landscape by bringing GG back, which really has defined Peter's life in the last decade.

Also I forget who, but the writer who turned Harry back into the GG and past the point of no return and killed him certainly changed Peter's guilt to a new level.

And JMS has put some pretty big things in. The biggest seems to be quickly being undone (unfortunately) of making him a high school teacher which showed GREAT depth and growth as he goes back to his roots and a change in personality. He also (unfortunately) has brought mysticism into the origin and you cannot say the unmasking was not a huge step (whether in the wrong direction or not) for the character.

Now whether he has grown up more, well that is debatable. He has become more mature and cynical but still can be seen as 20 something with a way too happy-go-lucky disposition for someone of his level of loss in the world. However that has more to do with Lee saying in the '70s we have to "make the illusion of change" than not. However, these were major contributions that broke that rule and that is why they are remembered before oh say the Puma or the Spot then.


Let me explain what I mean.

When Stan developed Spider-Man, he didn't simply create events. He created lasting change and as I mentioned evolutionary elements for Peter.

From Amazing Fantasy #15 through ASM #28 when Peter graduated, through the late 60's and on to the early 70's when Stan left the title there was a smooth progression of Peter as a character and his supporting characters.

New villains represented new challenges. And every appearance by big time villains like Ock or the Goblin were major events leading to important developments:

Master Planner was Peter stepping into manhood.
Goblin arc in 39-40 led to Peter's id being revealed as well as the Goblin's id.
the introduction of the Kingpin re-affirmed for Peter his mission.
The Ock-amnesia arc further developed Peter's relationship with Gwen.
Ock's next appearance ended in the death of Captain Stacy.
The Goblin's next appearance dealt with drug addiction.

So to compare:

Ben's death led to Peter dilligently sacrificing much of his life to fighting crime.

Gwen's death led to......? Resilience? Of course Peter would regroup and move on. He'd have to unless the were ending the title. But what affect did it have on him? None.

Doc Ock is a powerful foe that first forced Peter to up his game. And each subsequent Ock appearance (Under Lee at least) brought a more dangerous Doc Ock, forcing Peter to rise to the occasion again and again. all of these made Spider-Man a greater hero.

Compare this to Venom appearances, where Peter actually appeared weaker each time. Never upping his game, never rising to the occasion. Merely getting lucky or unbelievably laying down for Venom (ASM #347 & 375). Thus weakening Spider-Man as a character. There's no question why at one point, Venom was a more popular character than Spider-Man.

So I'm saying that developments post-Lee haven't been as resounding. Another example- Hobgoblin. As much beloved as he may be, he's still just an attempt to recreate the Green Goblin. The same 2 year run of who he might be, Black Cat- I wholely disagree about the significance of that relationship. How did it affect Peter? What changes did it make in his life? What change did it make in how he dealt with his soon-after marriage with MJ? There's a clear indicator about the way Peter changed after his relationship with Betty ended. No change at all after Gwen's death. No advancement in his first superhero relationship, and there should have been.

So this is what I mean when I say evolution. And because the various creative teams over the years have bounced Spidey around focusing on event rather than characterization, which has led to where we are now, where nothing but events happen, and the events are meaningless.
 
Aside from getting married I agree.

I don't think thats a bad thing however.
 
Wolfman had developed JJJameson's character like no other writer ever had before or since. We get to learn of Jameson's first wife, his early life, etc... And the nervous breakdown he subsequently falls into due to all the stress in his life at the time. And Marvel could have actually gone somewhere with the magic he built up on JJJ, and Bat'Scribe Denis O'Neill wiped it all away in ONE issue with a Jonah Harrow "Mean Meachine" (of all things... :whatever: :whatever: :whatever: ) in ASM #206.

That was a true "fumbling of the ball" by Marvel at that time.

:csad:
 
Dragon said:
New villains represented new challenges. And every appearance by big time villains like Ock or the Goblin were major events leading to important developments:

Master Planner was Peter stepping into manhood.
Goblin arc in 39-40 led to Peter's id being revealed as well as the Goblin's id.
the introduction of the Kingpin re-affirmed for Peter his mission.
The Ock-amnesia arc further developed Peter's relationship with Gwen.
Ock's next appearance ended in the death of Captain Stacy.
The Goblin's next appearance dealt with drug addiction.

And this is why Ock and GG wear the crowns of greatest villains in the Spider-Man mythos. Peter's greatest enemy in the Goblin, and Spidey's greatest enemy in Ock.

Gwen's death led to......? Resilience? Of course Peter would regroup and move on. He'd have to unless the were ending the title. But what affect did it have on him? None.

I always thought it was rather distasteful of MJ to be making moves on Peter so shortly after Gwen died. Remember the christmas party in ASM #130, where she kept trying to get him under the mistletoe??

What effect would you of liked Gwen's death to have on Peter Dragon??

Compare this to Venom appearances, where Peter actually appeared weaker each time. Never upping his game, never rising to the occasion. Merely getting lucky or unbelievably laying down for Venom (ASM #347 & 375). Thus weakening Spider-Man as a character. There's no question why at one point, Venom was a more popular character than Spider-Man.

And this is why Venom is a worn out cliche. I'll never understand his popularity.

God, even his reasons for hating Spider-Man are lame.
 
J.M. DeMatteis and Tom Defalco have had a large impact on the Spider-Man mythos. In fact, The Clone Saga had a large effect on the mythos of Spider-Man, too bad they brushed THAT under the rug. :(
 
Well you have a point on Venom. He was created for probably a recurring 3 storyline character. I think his reasons were lame but the idea of someone who saw himself as the hero with Spider-Man's powers and knew Parker's identity but didn't reveal it or hurt loved ones but merely wanted to kill Spider-Man and was UNSTOPPABLE. Cool concept. One story was great, two made it more desperate and better and after three he was iconic. But then you have to let Peter finally cleanly defeat Venom....otherwise you end up with what came to be the joke you mentioned. And no he doesn't touch Doc Ock or especially the Green Goblin.

But your point seems a bit harsh and condescending. I would say that Gwen's death is a MAJOR storyline that affects most issues to this day. I think it was a MUCH bigger deal than when Captain Stacy died. Here we have Pete losing the love of his life. Yes he rebounded but this was the turning point. I've argued it before and I"ll do it again as the title page of ASM #121 said, this is turning point. Spidey loses the love of his life and is bitter. He goes on a rampage and afterwards is hollow. He rebounds and reconciles with his anger but afterwards he is always a little more cynical and it haunts him. It was with him every time he started to date a new girl it haunted him when he was even with the Black Cat, he almost didn't get married because of this and was late because of his own wedding over the matter both in the dangers it presented for his loved ones and his promise to Gwen he was about to break. And better or worse Loeb and JMS seem to love to hit us over the head with it. I think Jenkins did it in a much better subtle way in his two Green Goblin stories.

It is still felt. And while I agree Master Planner was a turning point for the character as he grew up substantially in it and was more ocnfidant afterward and social and well normal and no longer the ackward bookworm (though still at times ackward), he was still a boy in many respects. Stan always referred to him as a "youth" or a boy. As did Conaway all the way up to this story. They quit doing that afterwards for a reason.

And let's not forget how Conaway led the way for major developments in Harry's character and Liz and MJ. Even Flash has grown from high school jock who befriends begrudgingly Parker in college to a good friend, to a washed up drunk who sleeps with a married woman and looks on in awe and admiration for what Peter has (marriage) and wants it.

And as I said the marriage is probably the biggest step in the comics since Peter entered college (nevermind graduate school, TA and ultimately dropping out to become a full time photographer). This was the changing moment of his life, whether you like it or not and does signify change and growth. Now he has past the newlywed stage and has not gone much further but you cannot deny he hasn't aged a bit since marriage and is more mature and well....responsible now.
 
Doc Ock said:
What effect would you of liked Gwen's death to have on Peter Dragon??

I would have wanted to see true reverberation in Peter's life and psyche.

It should have taken Peter a long time before he could have entered another relationship. When the first kiss between Peter and MJ happened in ASM #143, I'd have had Peter accept that as a momentary respite from the pain that he felt. But then reject it because of his fear of putting another loved one in the line of fire.

At the same time, Spidey would become much darker and angrier. Much more harsh with villains. Even getting on the bad side of other heroes to the point where some of the police concerns might seem warranted. Yes, he'd maintain the sense of humor, not become totally sullen, but he wouldn't be Mr. Nice Guy anymore.

He'd be on a destructive path. But gradually his relationship with MJ and his other friends would bring him out of it. And he'd begin to see just how far he was going. Then- we have the clone saga. I'd have had the Gwen clone at the end of the story help to absolve Peter of some of his guilt, and make it possible for him to forgive himself for Gwen's death, and begin to have a relationship with MJ.

Then, after their relationship develops, have Peter become overly protective of her out of fear of the same thing happening as with Gwen, which might lead to a break-up.

The main point is, to take what would be natural reactions for Peter to Gwen's death and build on them.
 
Dragon said:
I would have wanted to see true reverberation in Peter's life and psyche.

It should have taken Peter a long time before he could have entered another relationship. When the first kiss between Peter and MJ happened in ASM #143, I'd have had Peter accept that as a momentary respite from the pain that he felt. But then reject it because of his fear of putting another loved one in the line of fire.

Sounds good.

At the same time, Spidey would become much darker and angrier. Much more harsh with villains. Even getting on the bad side of other heroes to the point where some of the police concerns might seem warranted. Yes, he'd maintain the sense of humor, not become totally sullen, but he wouldn't be Mr. Nice Guy anymore.

Something similar to that happened to Batman after the Joker killed Jason Todd. He became even darker, angrier, more violent and vicious with the bad guys.

It was that noticeable that it was one of the factors that helped Tim Drake figure out who Batman really was.

He'd be on a destructive path. But gradually his relationship with MJ and his other friends would bring him out of it. And he'd begin to see just how far he was going. Then- we have the clone saga. I'd have had the Gwen clone at the end of the story help to absolve Peter of some of his guilt, and make it possible for him to forgive himself for Gwen's death, and begin to have a relationship with MJ.

Then, after their relationship develops, have Peter become overly protective of her out of fear of the same thing happening as with Gwen, which might lead to a break-up.

The main point is, to take what would be natural reactions for Peter to Gwen's death and build on them.

That all sounds great Dragon :up: Its a shame guys like you are not on the pay roll at Marvel right now ;)
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"